menu
Logo
99+
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
99+
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Official Game 8 Thread: Kent St.
Page: 4 of 5
mail
OhioCatFan
10/22/2016 5:30 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Sorry, but if my front 7 on d is totally solid but I'm worried about the back end...then I let the front seven loose.

Lotsa different type of pressures, blitzes.

Not us. We're very contain, playing to physical power with no finesse, no strategy, no different looks.


Let 'em loose!

Geez, even our defense is boring.
Again, I interrupt, just temporarily, this rant, with a factoid:

http://www.espn.com/college-football/statistics/team/_/st...


Your factoid is that we're 2nd in the nation in sacks to Ohio State.

Clearly, this proves that we're the second best team in the nation, right after Ohio State.


At least we're not picking a splinter metric that doesn't prove anything here.
Reading comprehension? It was Alabama in the #1 slot. You missed the point. You claim we don't have a pressure defense, but how in the world are you #2 in sacks with a non-pressure defense. Watch the replay of the EMU game and you'll see a lot of pressure, often unsuccessful in that game, but pressure nonetheless,
mail
person
Mark Lembright '85
10/22/2016 5:37 PM
Ohio in its best of years usually doesn't beat Kent State on the road. Maybe it wasn't pretty, but I'll take the win and move on.
mail
MariettaCatFanatic
10/22/2016 5:46 PM
Mark Lembright '85 wrote:expand_more
Ohio in its best of years usually doesn't beat Kent State on the road. Maybe it wasn't pretty, but I'll take the win and move on.
Agreed. Dix has been a house of horrors for us over the years. I still have not gotten over the final game of the season where we dropped that game to them that sent Miami to the MAC Title game over us.
mail
person
Pataskala
10/22/2016 5:48 PM
I'd call this avoiding a loss as much as a win. Offense was completely overwhelmed in the second half.

Great job by the D. They didn't get much help at all in the second half.

We're 5-0 when scoring first; 0-3 when the opp scores first.

Too many big penalties. I think we had more penalty yds in the second half than offense yds.

Question for Toledo game: do we start a rested Wyndham or stick with Maxwell?

Since we had so little TOP in the second half, our O line should be rested for Toledo.
mail
person
colobobcat66
10/22/2016 6:09 PM
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
I'd call this avoiding a loss as much as a win. Offense was completely overwhelmed in the second half.

Great job by the D. They didn't get much help at all in the second half.

We're 5-0 when scoring first; 0-3 when the opp scores first.

Too many big penalties. I think we had more penalty yds in the second half than offense yds.

Question for Toledo game: do we start a rested Wyndham or stick with Maxwell?

Since we had so little TOP in the second half, our O line should be rested for Toledo.
Just a little correction- we are 5-0 when we score a td first. We had 2 field goals in the Texas State game before they scored a TD.
mail
person
allen
10/22/2016 8:18 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Does boring and longtime-together older fire up recruits?
They know they can come in and play. Now we need to change the scheme
mail
person
MonroeClassmate
10/22/2016 8:45 PM
Positives while watching at Dix

Sebastian Smith--man he had some hands in this game

Papi White: the most athletic move I've seen a receiver make since at least watching Lynn Swann. It didn't result in a catch but it surely didn't result in a pick. Papi heading north up the Bobcat sideline and a bomb thrown to him in coverage. Papi slightly behind the defender somehow stuck a pivot foot getting himself between himself and his QB 40 yards down field and leaps as high as anyone his size has ever leaped and deflects the ball from a likely pick. My guest at the game said, "That guy is the most athletic guy on the field".

Watching the Kent QB seemingly make positive yards almost every play by bobbing and weaving and sometimes leaving a few sprawling Bobcats in his wake. Who says QB's shouldn't run often because they may get hurt--looked like that guy was causing the hurting.

The negative:

I froze my azz off and just now thawed out.

Good to win at Kent and keep pace with the Zips.

One more win and bowl eligibility takes place!
mail
person
Pataskala
10/22/2016 10:39 PM
Thanks, Colo. I usually check my facts, but went by memory on that one.

Kent's problem is that Nick Holley is their entire offense. He was gassed by the middle of the 4th Q. And he's a bit one dimensional. He's a runner first and a passer second. He had a poor completion percentage and he wasn't even close on most of his misses.
mail
person
ou79
10/22/2016 10:47 PM
Nick Holley is KSU's SIXTH (6th) string QB.
mail
Mike Johnson
10/22/2016 11:07 PM
ou79 wrote:expand_more
Nick Holley is KSU's SIXTH (6th) string QB.
6th? Whatever, perhaps he'll be the next Julian Edelman. Fast, shifty, gutsy.
mail
OhioCatFan
10/23/2016 12:00 AM
MonroeClassmate wrote:expand_more
Positives while watching at Dix

Sebastian Smith--man he had some hands in this game

Papi White: the most athletic move I've seen a receiver make since at least watching Lynn Swann. It didn't result in a catch but it surely didn't result in a pick. Papi heading north up the Bobcat sideline and a bomb thrown to him in coverage. Papi slightly behind the defender somehow stuck a pivot foot getting himself between himself and his QB 40 yards down field and leaps as high as anyone his size has ever leaped and deflects the ball from a likely pick. My guest at the game said, "That guy is the most athletic guy on the field".

Watching the Kent QB seemingly make positive yards almost every play by bobbing and weaving and sometimes leaving a few sprawling Bobcats in his wake. Who says QB's shouldn't run often because they may get hurt--looked like that guy was causing the hurting.

The negative:

I froze my azz off and just now thawed out.

Good to win at Kent and keep pace with the Zips.

One more win and bowl eligibility takes place!
Thanks for the info, Classmate. I appreciate your on-the-spot reporting. Good stuff. Go OHIO!
mail
Ted Thompson
10/23/2016 9:00 PM

 

mail
person
L.C.
10/23/2016 9:26 PM
Those runs by Dorian Brown and Maleek Irons are things of beauty. The Brown run was perfectly blocked. Connor Brown and Troy Watson sealed their guys outside. Cooper and Wood cut down guys inside, mucking up Kent's ability to flow. Pruehs hustled way downfield, and cut down a linebacker or Safety with a perfect block. Meanwhile Reid and Belack held their blocks on the DBs practically forever, and Brown stayed clean all the way home.

Irons showed the two traits on his run where I think he has uncanny ability. He saw the field perfectly, and cut back into a hole, then used his balance to break into clear.

Yes, the offense struggled in the game, but it also had some shining moments. They just need to keep improving each week. They have the tools and weapons to be good. Let's see them take the game to Toledo this week, and have them show what they can do.
mail
person
colobobcat66
10/23/2016 9:30 PM
My summary is that there is no such thing as an ugly win.
Last Edited: 10/23/2016 9:42:36 PM by colobobcat66
mail
person
allen
10/23/2016 11:06 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Those runs by Dorian Brown and Maleek Irons are things of beauty. The Brown run was perfectly blocked. Connor Brown and Troy Watson sealed their guys outside. Cooper and Wood cut down guys inside, mucking up Kent's ability to flow. Pruehs hustled way downfield, and cut down a linebacker or Safety with a perfect block. Meanwhile Reid and Belack held their blocks on the DBs practically forever, and Brown stayed clean all the way home.

Irons showed the two traits on his run where I think he has uncanny ability. He saw the field perfectly, and cut back into a hole, then used his balance to break into clear.

Yes, the offense struggled in the game, but it also had some shining moments. They just need to keep improving each week. They have the tools and weapons to be good. Let's see them take the game to Toledo this week, and have them show what they can do.
If Irons were in better condition, he would have scored, also he looked back. AJ Brown and Oulette will be a handfull.
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
10/24/2016 3:08 AM
OKay, two good plays. No doubt.

Now, let's typify the entire rest of our offense and the rest of the game against a really quite bad team. A game we barely won.

As usual.
mail
person
allen
10/24/2016 7:20 AM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
OKay, two good plays. No doubt.

Now, let's typify the entire rest of our offense and the rest of the game against a really quite bad team. A game we barely won.

As usual.
We do have to play better. We scored 20+ against Tennessee and 14 against. Kent. Our Wide receiver's need to get more separation and out O-line needs to get more push. We need more explosive plays. Go Cats
mail
Ted Thompson
10/24/2016 9:33 AM

I'll ask the same question I did after the BG game. Kent St. called their last timeout after 1st down and there was 1:27 left. Why did we run a play? Two kneeldowns and it's a ball game. Brown ran for a first down on the ensuing play but that ball almost got stripped from behind.

mail
person
allen
10/24/2016 11:33 AM
Ted Thompson wrote:expand_more
I'll ask the same question I did after the BG game. Kent St. called their last timeout after 1st down and there was 1:27 left. Why did we run a play? Two kneeldowns and it's a ball game. Brown ran for a first down on the ensuing play but that ball almost got stripped from behind.
you are right, no need to take a risk.
mail
person
Deciduous Forest Cat
10/24/2016 12:03 PM
allen wrote:expand_more
I'll ask the same question I did after the BG game. Kent St. called their last timeout after 1st down and there was 1:27 left. Why did we run a play? Two kneeldowns and it's a ball game. Brown ran for a first down on the ensuing play but that ball almost got stripped from behind.
you are right, no need to take a risk.
we would still need three plays. :40 + :40 = 1:20

This brings up a question... What determines a 25 second play clock vs 40? I can't tell which one applies to which situation.
mail
person
BillyTheCat
10/24/2016 12:25 PM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
I'll ask the same question I did after the BG game. Kent St. called their last timeout after 1st down and there was 1:27 left. Why did we run a play? Two kneeldowns and it's a ball game. Brown ran for a first down on the ensuing play but that ball almost got stripped from behind.
you are right, no need to take a risk.
we would still need three plays. :40 + :40 = 1:20

This brings up a question... What determines a 25 second play clock vs 40? I can't tell which one applies to which situation.
On a play where there is no stoppage, just a normal down that ends without an official stopping the clock (i.e. helmet comes off, penalty, officials time out, injury time out, review, or regular timeout) all plays will start on the :40 second play clock. The clock will start as soon as the officials raise their hand signaling the end of the last down.

Plays where the clock stops (other than a first down, incomplete pass, or ball out of bounds) the clock will start on the 'ready' and will be :25 sec in duration.
mail
Ted Thompson
10/24/2016 1:38 PM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
I'll ask the same question I did after the BG game. Kent St. called their last timeout after 1st down and there was 1:27 left. Why did we run a play? Two kneeldowns and it's a ball game. Brown ran for a first down on the ensuing play but that ball almost got stripped from behind.
you are right, no need to take a risk.
we would still need three plays. :40 + :40 = 1:20

This brings up a question... What determines a 25 second play clock vs 40? I can't tell which one applies to which situation.
But the plays themselves take time. So just wait a second and kneel. After they got the first down, Maxwell was waiting to kneel (even though, at that point, he didn't need to).
mail
person
BillyTheCat
10/24/2016 1:57 PM
Ted Thompson wrote:expand_more
I'll ask the same question I did after the BG game. Kent St. called their last timeout after 1st down and there was 1:27 left. Why did we run a play? Two kneeldowns and it's a ball game. Brown ran for a first down on the ensuing play but that ball almost got stripped from behind.
you are right, no need to take a risk.
we would still need three plays. :40 + :40 = 1:20

This brings up a question... What determines a 25 second play clock vs 40? I can't tell which one applies to which situation.
But the plays themselves take time. So just wait a second and kneel. After they got the first down, Maxwell was waiting to kneel (even though, at that point, he didn't need to).
Announcing that you are taking a knee gives the QB and other protections from being blown up. Not going directly down after announcing you are taking a knee is a penalty of 15 yards, and will cause the clock to stop until the next snap under the consume, conserve principle. When under a :40 second clock, the clock begins as soon as the play is over, with no regards to how slow or fast people move to un-pile, and get set. Before the :40, teams and officials could manipulate the pace at the end of a game if it was needed. Not now.
mail
100%Cat
10/24/2016 2:23 PM
It's a road win, so I shouldn't complain too much. But as someone who has seen a lot of Ohio football since the late 90's, it's alarming how often we don't put a team away when we should. We allow way too many teams to "linger," within striking distance. Sometimes it results in a loss (Texas St), sometimes uncomfortable wins (Kent, BGSU). I just never expect easy, low stress wins.
mail
Ted Thompson
10/24/2016 3:45 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
I'll ask the same question I did after the BG game. Kent St. called their last timeout after 1st down and there was 1:27 left. Why did we run a play? Two kneeldowns and it's a ball game. Brown ran for a first down on the ensuing play but that ball almost got stripped from behind.
you are right, no need to take a risk.
we would still need three plays. :40 + :40 = 1:20

This brings up a question... What determines a 25 second play clock vs 40? I can't tell which one applies to which situation.
But the plays themselves take time. So just wait a second and kneel. After they got the first down, Maxwell was waiting to kneel (even though, at that point, he didn't need to).
Announcing that you are taking a knee gives the QB and other protections from being blown up. Not going directly down after announcing you are taking a knee is a penalty of 15 yards, and will cause the clock to stop until the next snap under the consume, conserve principle. When under a :40 second clock, the clock begins as soon as the play is over, with no regards to how slow or fast people move to un-pile, and get set. Before the :40, teams and officials could manipulate the pace at the end of a game if it was needed. Not now.
But you can wait to take the knee. I see it all the time and have never seen a penalty. We're already taking a shotgun snap, so I don't see how you can announce you're taking a knee without actually taking the knee.
Showing Messages: 76 - 100 of 108
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
chevron_backward
chevron_forward
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)