Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Sporting News: MAC commissioner defends scheduling
Page: 1 of 2
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 1:39 PM
I can't disagree with the logic of his explanation.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 2:15 PM
I think he overstates the value of what he calls exposure. Western got a coach that got total buy-in from his team. There won't be another undefeated MAC team in the next five years.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 2:49 PM
I would love to know what it costs the teams/communities to have these weekday games. Lost gate and concession revenue for the teams, and lost revenue big time for Athens businesses, etc.

This thing works as long as teams can still sell season tickets to fans who can't attend games mid-week.

Has the MAC gotten any better as the result of these mid-week games or it is all about the money? The MAC does get better exposure, but having stadiums with 2-3 thousand fans doesn't do much in raising the profile of the league in my opinion. It comes across as really bush league.
OU_Country
General User
Member Since: 12/6/2005
Location: On the road between Athens and Madison County
Post Count: 8,401
mail
OU_Country
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 3:27 PM
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
I would love to know what it costs the teams/communities to have these weekday games. Lost gate and concession revenue for the teams, and lost revenue big time for Athens businesses, etc.

This thing works as long as teams can still sell season tickets to fans who can't attend games mid-week.

Has the MAC gotten any better as the result of these mid-week games or it is all about the money? The MAC does get better exposure, but having stadiums with 2-3 thousand fans doesn't do much in raising the profile of the league in my opinion. It comes across as really bush league.
All good questions that would be interesting to know answers to. At the end of the day, mid-week MACtion has been great for the league. I still think it's time to modify it. Any game that isn't making it onto ESPN, ESPN2, or ESPNU should be played on a typical Saturday. ESPN3, while I love it for college basketball, isn't giving real "exposure" to anyone except current fans and alumni. People in Florida aren't flipping on ESPN3 and saying, gee, let's watch the third best MAC game tonight when their cable network has it on two other channels already. Maybe I'm mistaken, but that's my feeling on the ESPN3 vs cable games.
Maryland Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Post Count: 169
mail
Maryland Bobcat
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 5:17 PM
Well if there was ever any question the most important thing to this sport is that article summed it up. So on one hand mid-major programs complain about the power and the influence of money at the P5 level, yet turn around and basically let it control every action at our level. We’re no better by selling ourselves out simply for a paycheck.

For the record I think it’s very short-cited. Do people tune in because there’s no other games on? Sure, I think that’s valid, but will they continue to tune in to watch games when absolutely nobody is in the stadium? I’m not sure about that. I think long-term viewers will ultimately find that boring - without fans it turns something possibly compelling into ho-hum television. 5-10 years ago watching a mid-major game on tv was compelling because the fans showed up in droves to have a big game on tv. Now there’s nothing special about it, and attendance at these games continues to dwindle. Think where we were a few years ago for that blackout game vs Temple (packed house), then look at our games last year. They are playing with fire by alienating entire fan bases. Students that don’t go to games (and to be fair some weeknights it’s tough depending on exam and vacation schedules and cold weather) won't go on to become future loyal supporters. Not to mention young alumni coming back to visit on weekends those first couple of years out. Also, fans that have to travel a decent distance, such as myself, never can see a key conference home game in person. We’re usually stuck going to see a Labor Day weekend matchup vs Gardner-Webb or trying to battle the crowds and costs of Homecoming. They’re turning off key segments of supporters leaving only the local community, and season ticket holders within an hour’s drive to prop up ticket sales. I was fortunate enough to attend during the Grobe era when students really started tailgating and attending in large numbers for the first time. Great memories of those fall Saturdays!
Last Edited: 3/15/2017 5:17:25 PM by Maryland Bobcat
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 6:45 PM
Maryland Bobcat wrote:expand_more
Well if there was ever any question the most important thing to this sport is that article summed it up. So on one hand mid-major programs complain about the power and the influence of money at the P5 level, yet turn around and basically let it control every action at our level. We’re no better by selling ourselves out simply for a paycheck.

For the record I think it’s very short-cited. Do people tune in because there’s no other games on? Sure, I think that’s valid, but will they continue to tune in to watch games when absolutely nobody is in the stadium? I’m not sure about that. I think long-term viewers will ultimately find that boring - without fans it turns something possibly compelling into ho-hum television. 5-10 years ago watching a mid-major game on tv was compelling because the fans showed up in droves to have a big game on tv. Now there’s nothing special about it, and attendance at these games continues to dwindle. Think where we were a few years ago for that blackout game vs Temple (packed house), then look at our games last year. They are playing with fire by alienating entire fan bases. Students that don’t go to games (and to be fair some weeknights it’s tough depending on exam and vacation schedules and cold weather) won't go on to become future loyal supporters. Not to mention young alumni coming back to visit on weekends those first couple of years out. Also, fans that have to travel a decent distance, such as myself, never can see a key conference home game in person. We’re usually stuck going to see a Labor Day weekend matchup vs Gardner-Webb or trying to battle the crowds and costs of Homecoming. They’re turning off key segments of supporters leaving only the local community, and season ticket holders within an hour’s drive to prop up ticket sales. I was fortunate enough to attend during the Grobe era when students really started tailgating and attending in large numbers for the first time. Great memories of those fall Saturdays!
MD,you nailed it. I live right here in town, have seats on the 50 and access to the end zone tent but when I can watch it from the comfort of my home on a weekday night when it's cold or rainy, I do. Weekends are the way to go. And has anyone talked about the number of classes being missed?
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 6:57 PM
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
I would love to know what it costs the teams/communities to have these weekday games. Lost gate and concession revenue for the teams, and lost revenue big time for Athens businesses, etc....

It seems like Alan posted something a few years back that come study had shown that each Saturday home game was worth about $.5 million to the Athens business community. I've always thought that it was more than a coincidence that NIU's attendance slide began when they started turning their back on the DeKalb business community and scheduling big games at Soldier field.

If a Saturday game is worth $.5 million, I'd guess a weekday game is worth $.1 million, so the Athens business community loses $.8 million as a result of losing two Saturday home games. Ohio, meanwhile, does get about $.7 million for the TV appearance. They also lose perhaps 5,000 a game in paid attendance, get less per ticket, and less in concessions. Probably Ohio losses $.1 million per game, or $.2 million for the season from the midweek games, so they are net $.5 to the positive in cash flow. Logically that means $.5 million less that needs to be assessed in fees, so more money in the pockets of students, some of which, in turn, ends up back in the business community. Regardless, Ohio is a little better off, and the business community is significantly worse off.

All this is moot, though. The TV contract runs until the 2026 season.
Last Edited: 3/15/2017 6:58:19 PM by L.C.
CA Bobcat
General User
CB
Member Since: 12/23/2004
Location: San Ramon, CA
Post Count: 149
person
mail
CA Bobcat
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 7:38 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
Well if there was ever any question the most important thing to this sport is that article summed it up. So on one hand mid-major programs complain about the power and the influence of money at the P5 level, yet turn around and basically let it control every action at our level. We’re no better by selling ourselves out simply for a paycheck.

For the record I think it’s very short-cited. Do people tune in because there’s no other games on? Sure, I think that’s valid, but will they continue to tune in to watch games when absolutely nobody is in the stadium? I’m not sure about that. I think long-term viewers will ultimately find that boring - without fans it turns something possibly compelling into ho-hum television. 5-10 years ago watching a mid-major game on tv was compelling because the fans showed up in droves to have a big game on tv. Now there’s nothing special about it, and attendance at these games continues to dwindle. Think where we were a few years ago for that blackout game vs Temple (packed house), then look at our games last year. They are playing with fire by alienating entire fan bases. Students that don’t go to games (and to be fair some weeknights it’s tough depending on exam and vacation schedules and cold weather) won't go on to become future loyal supporters. Not to mention young alumni coming back to visit on weekends those first couple of years out. Also, fans that have to travel a decent distance, such as myself, never can see a key conference home game in person. We’re usually stuck going to see a Labor Day weekend matchup vs Gardner-Webb or trying to battle the crowds and costs of Homecoming. They’re turning off key segments of supporters leaving only the local community, and season ticket holders within an hour’s drive to prop up ticket sales. I was fortunate enough to attend during the Grobe era when students really started tailgating and attending in large numbers for the first time. Great memories of those fall Saturdays!
MD,you nailed it. I live right here in town, have seats on the 50 and access to the end zone tent but when I can watch it from the comfort of my home on a weekday night when it's cold or rainy, I do. Weekends are the way to go. And has anyone talked about the number of classes being missed?
Um, what if it's cold and rainy on a weekend?
MonroeClassmate
General User
MC
Member Since: 8/31/2010
Post Count: 2,325
person
mail
MonroeClassmate
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 8:27 PM
One gripe: rivals getting a crappy game.

Look at the Zips. Their two biggest conference draws, Kent and OHIO are on week nights in November. Total BS. And few fans in the stands when there may have been many on a balmy Saturday in September/October.

If the two November Akron opponents were low draw games then there is a benefit for the exposure. Taking revenue away from the Zips by scheduling the way they did is indefensible.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 8:51 PM
I wonder whether the mid-week November games help boost attendance for the Sept/Oct Saturday games. People who would've attended a Nov game because of the opposing team may decide to go to an earlier game instead because they can't make a mid-week game.

Also, I think the MAC athletics offices should be more flexible with season ticket packages. Should offer a package of Saturday-only games or maybe let fans buy a package of something like any four home games. Why make them pay for games they can't go to or give away (other than to pad the attendance figures).
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,558
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 9:13 PM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
[QUOTE=colobobcat66]
Any game that isn't making it onto ESPN, ESPN2, or ESPNU should be played on a typical Saturday. ESPN3, while I love it for college basketball, isn't giving real "exposure" to anyone except current fans and alumni.
you can not do this. there is no true bye week anymore, so having some games on Saturday creates unfair scheduling where one team has 10-11 days rest and another has 6. Coaches would not go for this. Besides, how many people are actually in the stands at most MAC games in November? (hint: very few) Is everyone's memory foggy? Does your brain tell you we had packed houses with high-priced tickets? We're the top attendance team in the conference and I promise you being on TV is a huge net gain in revenue.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 9:13 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
I would love to know what it costs the teams/communities to have these weekday games. Lost gate and concession revenue for the teams, and lost revenue big time for Athens businesses, etc....

It seems like Alan posted something a few years back that come study had shown that each Saturday home game was worth about $.5 million to the Athens business community. I've always thought that it was more than a coincidence that NIU's attendance slide began when they started turning their back on the DeKalb business community and scheduling big games at Soldier field.

If a Saturday game is worth $.5 million, I'd guess a weekday game is worth $.1 million, so the Athens business community loses $.8 million as a result of losing two Saturday home games. Ohio, meanwhile, does get about $.7 million for the TV appearance. They also lose perhaps 5,000 a game in paid attendance, get less per ticket, and less in concessions. Probably Ohio losses $.1 million per game, or $.2 million for the season from the midweek games, so they are net $.5 to the positive in cash flow. Logically that means $.5 million less that needs to be assessed in fees, so more money in the pockets of students, some of which, in turn, ends up back in the business community. Regardless, Ohio is a little better off, and the business community is significantly worse off.

All this is moot, though. The TV contract runs until the 2026 season.
Excellent points LC but until someone does a public records request, we'll never know the real numbers related to various attendance figures. You cite $5000 in walk up paid attendance. That's only 250 people. Scary thought.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 3/15/2017 11:29 PM
When I said "They also lose perhaps 5,000 a game in paid attendance, get less per ticket, and less in concessions", I meant they get about 5,000 less people per game for weekday games, and they lose $100,000 as a result.
Maryland Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Post Count: 169
mail
Maryland Bobcat
mail
Posted: 3/16/2017 2:38 PM
CA Bobcat wrote:expand_more
Well if there was ever any question the most important thing to this sport is that article summed it up. So on one hand mid-major programs complain about the power and the influence of money at the P5 level, yet turn around and basically let it control every action at our level. We’re no better by selling ourselves out simply for a paycheck.

For the record I think it’s very short-cited. Do people tune in because there’s no other games on? Sure, I think that’s valid, but will they continue to tune in to watch games when absolutely nobody is in the stadium? I’m not sure about that. I think long-term viewers will ultimately find that boring - without fans it turns something possibly compelling into ho-hum television. 5-10 years ago watching a mid-major game on tv was compelling because the fans showed up in droves to have a big game on tv. Now there’s nothing special about it, and attendance at these games continues to dwindle. Think where we were a few years ago for that blackout game vs Temple (packed house), then look at our games last year. They are playing with fire by alienating entire fan bases. Students that don’t go to games (and to be fair some weeknights it’s tough depending on exam and vacation schedules and cold weather) won't go on to become future loyal supporters. Not to mention young alumni coming back to visit on weekends those first couple of years out. Also, fans that have to travel a decent distance, such as myself, never can see a key conference home game in person. We’re usually stuck going to see a Labor Day weekend matchup vs Gardner-Webb or trying to battle the crowds and costs of Homecoming. They’re turning off key segments of supporters leaving only the local community, and season ticket holders within an hour’s drive to prop up ticket sales. I was fortunate enough to attend during the Grobe era when students really started tailgating and attending in large numbers for the first time. Great memories of those fall Saturdays!
MD,you nailed it. I live right here in town, have seats on the 50 and access to the end zone tent but when I can watch it from the comfort of my home on a weekday night when it's cold or rainy, I do. Weekends are the way to go. And has anyone talked about the number of classes being missed?
Um, what if it's cold and rainy on a weekend?

I think the biggest difference is weekend games attract more fans from outside the area who come visit for the weekend. If you've made your plans, have hotel reservations, meeting up with friends, etc I think more are likely to go despite the weather. Weeknight games draw only those immediately in the community or close by and there isn't the incentive to go if it's cold and raining.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 3/16/2017 10:28 PM
Why don't we try escaping mediocrity (the land of at least four losses a year and no MACC).

Maybe winning will give us a more fervent fan base. I suspect we'll start seeing drop off in actual bodies in Peden (if we haven't already) if we don't start playing in a way that makes us look like a legit contender for a MACC.

Hint: 8-6 does not meet that standard.



Hey, you're the one who brought up the topic.
Last Edited: 3/16/2017 10:28:38 PM by Monroe Slavin
OhioStunter
General User
Member Since: 2/18/2005
Location: Chicago
Post Count: 2,516
mail
OhioStunter
mail
Posted: 3/17/2017 2:32 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
I suspect we'll start seeing drop off in actual bodies in Peden (if we haven't already) if we don't start playing in a way that makes us look like a legit contender for a MACC.
Is playing in the championship game against the No. 17 team and against an 18-point spread and losing by 6 not considered a legit contender for a MACC?
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 3/17/2017 2:51 PM
OhioStunter wrote:expand_more
I suspect we'll start seeing drop off in actual bodies in Peden (if we haven't already) if we don't start playing in a way that makes us look like a legit contender for a MACC.
Is playing in the championship game against the No. 17 team and against an 18-point spread and losing by 6 not considered a legit contender for a MACC?
He's hopeless. he just keeps talking to advertise dog bags. What a joke.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 3/17/2017 7:04 PM
OhioStunter wrote:expand_more
I suspect we'll start seeing drop off in actual bodies in Peden (if we haven't already) if we don't start playing in a way that makes us look like a legit contender for a MACC.

Is playing in the championship game against the No. 17 team and against an 18-point spread and losing by 6 not considered a legit contender for a MACC?

Actually he just telegraphed his next argument. If Windham hadn't thrown the pick at the end, and instead had Ohio driven to win, Ohio would not have been a "legit" champion, whatever that is.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 3/18/2017 2:12 PM
We were vaguely close in the MAC title game last year.


But we lost.

We were 8-6 last year, worse than the prior year.

We lost 3 of our last 4 last year.

0-4 MAC Championship games.

2-6 bowl games, last bowl win being in 2012..about 80 years ago.




Now, if we'd've won the MAC title game, I'd be an ass and I suspect that interest in the program would skyrocket.

But we lost.


And, I've repeatedly posted that there are 13 teams in the MAC for football. Wrong; there are 12. So, if Solich brings home a MACC in year 13, he'll still be less than average and I'll still be right.


It must get tiring for you all SFB that the facts are on my side...allowing me to own you here.
Last Edited: 3/18/2017 2:16:32 PM by Monroe Slavin
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 3/18/2017 2:47 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
We were vaguely close in the MAC title game last year.


But we lost.

We were 8-6 last year, worse than the prior year.

We lost 3 of our last 4 last year.

0-4 MAC Championship games.

2-6 bowl games, last bowl win being in 2012..about 80 years ago.




Now, if we'd've won the MAC title game, I'd be an ass and I suspect that interest in the program would skyrocket.

But we lost.


And, I've repeatedly posted that there are 13 teams in the MAC for football. Wrong; there are 12. So, if Solich brings home a MACC in year 13, he'll still be less than average and I'll still be right.


It must get tiring for you all SFB that the facts are on my side...allowing me to own you here.
All you own is some sorry existence in negativity. Enjoy it.
Go sell some doggie bags.
Last Edited: 3/18/2017 2:48:09 PM by colobobcat66
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,683
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 3/18/2017 4:54 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Now, if we'd've won the MAC title game, I'd be an ass . . .
As a CPA and a numbers guy, you sometimes get confused with your tenses. ;-)
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 3/18/2017 8:31 PM
Good call.

I use alternative tenses.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 3/18/2017 8:34 PM
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
We were vaguely close in the MAC title game last year.


But we lost.

We were 8-6 last year, worse than the prior year.

We lost 3 of our last 4 last year.

0-4 MAC Championship games.

2-6 bowl games, last bowl win being in 2012..about 80 years ago.




Now, if we'd've won the MAC title game, I'd be an ass and I suspect that interest in the program would skyrocket.

But we lost.


And, I've repeatedly posted that there are 13 teams in the MAC for football. Wrong; there are 12. So, if Solich brings home a MACC in year 13, he'll still be less than average and I'll still be right.


It must get tiring for you all SFB that the facts are on my side...allowing me to own you here.
All you own is some sorry existence in negativity. Enjoy it.
Go sell some doggie bags.

Good call.

When you don't have any argument or reply of substance, go trumpage.
Casper71
General User
C71
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,237
person
mail
Casper71
mail
Posted: 3/18/2017 8:57 PM
Back to scheduling...it seems to me the real question is what is the value of these mid week games to OHIO? To me, value would be increased enrollment, you know kids paying a bunch of money to go to school at OHIO. I really think some year they should survey new students and ask them: Is one of the primary reasons why you are enrolling at OHIO because you saw mid week football games on TV in November?

I don't think it is much value if a bunch of "non interested" 60 year old guys who are bored watch these games. Again, I would ask what is the value to OHIO of those viewers?

Seems to me the one potential value is "better" recruits. I have to question that premis given the program has not really moved forward on the field that much lately. And, do we ask the new recruits if they are coming to OHIO because we played mid games and they saw us or were they already identified and interested for other reasons?

So, experts, what do you think is the "real" value of playing mid week in November?
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 38
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)