Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Athlon Rates Ohio's Coaching Best In MAC
Page: 4 of 4
mail
person
L.C.
5/19/2017 11:52 AM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
...
But if you think recruiting is getting better .... then why are the results not? ...

I see three "eras" in recruiting under Solich:
1. The first was 2005-9, under Germano. There weren't a lot of highly rated recruits, but there were a lot of hidden gems. These recruits powered Ohio to the successes of 2009-12. It's still a shame that we never saw how good that 2012 team could have been.
2. The second recruiting "era" was 2010-12. I think the 2010 recruiting year was awful. It was very small, and even then there were a lot of players than never contributed. Smith and Dietz were hurt, and Kozak, Tarrant, Grady, Snyder, Jones, Atwell, and Stefanski vanished. I think 2011 looked good on paper, but had a lot of players who never contributed as much as hoped (Price, Haser, Welter, Hammonds, Bennett, Bell, Curtis), so it didn't turn out well as hoped. Then 2012 was another small class; it was good, but small, only 14 players, and then three of them promptly had career ending injuries (Tanner, Henry, Schany), making it even smaller. Those three classes contributed to your slump from 2013-15.
3. The third recruiting "era" was 2013-present. I see these classes as much better than 2010-12, and getting better each year. Based on what I have seen so far, I think they are substantially better than the classes of 2005-9, too. Time will tell us the answer to that.

I hope that this answers your question. When i said that I thought recruiting classes were improving, I was speaking of the last four years, and not a continuous improvement. There was definitely a valley in the middle. I guess that leads to two more questions:
1. If a valley in recruiting can lead to some worse years a few years later, why can't an upswing in recruiting lead to better years, too?
2. If they managed to remain bowl eligible, even with those not-very-good recruiting years, what can they do with the very good recruiting classes of 2014-17 (if they are as good as I think they are)?
Last Edited: 5/19/2017 11:56:13 AM by L.C.
mail
bshot44
5/19/2017 12:02 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
...
But if you think recruiting is getting better .... then why are the results not? ...

I see three "eras" in recruiting under Solich:
1. The first was 2005-9, under Germano. There weren't a lot of highly rated recruits, but there were a lot of hidden gems. These recruits powered Ohio to the successes of 2009-12. It's still a shame that we never saw how good that 2012 team could have been.
2. The second recruiting "era" was 2010-12. I think the 2010 recruiting year was awful. It was very small, and even then there were a lot of players than never contributed. Smith and Dietz were hurt, and Kozak, Tarrant, Grady, Snyder, Jones, Atwell, and Stefanski vanished. I think 2011 looked good on paper, but had a lot of players who never contributed as much as hoped (Price, Haser, Welter, Hammonds, Bennett, Bell, Curtis), so it didn't turn out well as hoped. Then 2012 was another small class; it was good, but small, only 14 players, and then three of them promptly had career ending injuries (Tanner, Henry, Schany), making it even smaller. Those three classes contributed to your slump from 2013-15.
3. The third recruiting "era" was 2013-present. I see these classes as much better than 2010-12, and getting better each year. Based on what I have seen so far, I think they are substantially better than the classes of 2005-9, too. Time will tell us the answer to that.

I hope that this answers your question. When i said that I thought recruiting classes were improving, I was speaking of the last four years, and not a continuous improvement. There was definitely a valley in the middle. I guess that leads to two more questions:
1. If a valley in recruiting can lead to some worse years a few years later, why can't an upswing in recruiting lead to better years, too?
2. If they managed to remain bowl eligible, even with those not-very-good recruiting years, what can they do with the very good recruiting classes of 2014-17 (if they are as good as I think they are)?
A lot of hypotheticals in there....which is why I don't put a lot of stock in ranking/rating recruiting classes until they produce results on the field.

Again, as we've both said, only time will tell whether this 2014-17 recruiting will pay dividends on the field.

I love your optimism and enthusiasm for the recent recruiting classes....but pardon me if I temper my excitement because they haven't done anything yet to prove you right. It's all hypotheticals right now....paper tigers....wishful thinking. There's nothing tangible yet to show if these classes are any better than those 2005-2009 classes.

If suddenly Ohio jumps to a 11-2, 6-2/7-1 team the next few years....then the answer will be a resounding yes, these were successful recruiting classes and the best years were yet to come.

But if the 8-5, 5-3/6-2 seasons continue....it's business as usual for Ohio football. More middle-of-the-road football in a below-average league. It's who Ohio is right now and, in my opinion, it's who they'll be as long as Frank is in the saddle. Just my opinion, but I don't see those great seasons on the horizon.

Everyone was throwing up all over themselves about Maleek Irons and other recruits in the recent years. Great. What have they produced in terms of wins/titles? Nothing special ... yet.

I'd love to be wrong. I'd love to see Ohio win MACC and a few more bowl games in the next 2-4 years. Just don't see it happening though.
Last Edited: 5/19/2017 12:05:18 PM by bshot44
mail
person
Bcat2
5/19/2017 2:59 PM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
It's really hard to take this "poll" by Athlon's serious.

Frank = 13th yr

No other coach has more than 5 yrs of tenure at a MAC school

Jinks (BG) - 2nd yr
Candle (UT)-2nd yr
Creighton (EMU) - 4th yr
Martin (MU) - 4th yr
Carey (NIU) - 6th yr
Bowden (UA) - 6th yr
Haynes (Kent) - 5th yr
Leipold (UB) - 3rd yr
Neu (BSU) - 2nd yr
Lester (WMU) - 1st yr
Bonamego (CMU) - 3rd yr

How many of these coaches, if given 12 yrs, would have at least one MACC?

I don't know....and I doubt we ever will. Why? Because coaches typically don't spend 12 yrs in the MAC!

So by seniority, Frank wins this "poll" by Athlons. No other coach, except for maybe Carey and Bowden, have a body of work that are able to be judged against Frank's. It's not because Frank has been so ultra-successful...it's because he has 7 YEARS ON EVERY OTHER COACH IN THE LEAGUE.

Do I think Jason Candle wins multiple MACC if he stays at Toledo for 12 years.....yep.

Do I think the same for Chuck Martin at Miami...yep.

Do I think the same for Mike Jinks at BG....maybe.

I'd take the vegas line that every coach on here, except for maybe Bowden & Haynes, might win a MACC if given 12 years at their respective school.

Do I think Frank ever wins one at Ohio.....probably not. Proof is in the track record. If he hasn't won one in 12 years, I don't think it's coming. This isn't the SEC or the B1G. It's the MAC. 12 years is more than enough time to fall into a MACC.

Does this mean Frank is a bad coach. No. Simple answer...no.

Does this poll mean Frank is an exemplary coach. I would say no as well.

He's a pretty good football coach. Not a great one. Is the best Ohio has had in 30 yrs....without question. But it's apples and oranges to compare him to Hess or Peden. Totally different eras. Totally different job descriptions now. Running a program in 2017 is much, much different than it was in 1968 or 1958.

And for the record...I looked this up before last season....

Again....Solich one of only three coaches in MAC HISTORY to not win a MAC title in 10+ yrs in the MAC.

Head Coaches with 10+ yrs tenure in MAC

Herb Deromedi (CMU)....he won 3 in 16 years
Bill Hess (OU)...won 4 in his first 11 years....but did not win one his last 9 years
Jim Harkema (EMU)...won 1 in 11 years
Bill Doolittle (WMU)...1 in 11 years
Gary Blackney (BG)...won 2 in 10 years
Paul Schudel (BSU)...won 2 in 10 years
Gary Pinkel (UT)...won 1 in his 10 years....played for 3 others in MACC
Al Molde (WMU)....won 1 in 10 years
Doyt Perry (BG)...won 5 in 10 years

Only 3 coaches in MAC history have coached 10+ years and failed to win a MAC title. The first is from the wayback machine....1951-63 before the MACC. The other two have a somwehat similar career.....

Joe Novak resurrected NIU from a 1-10, 0-11 team his first two years into a MAC West contender in 6 of his last 7 years....he bottomed out his final year going 2-10. But he certainly laid the foundation for Husky success going forward, playing in 3 MACC games and 2 bowl games (before the era of EVERYONE WITH A PULSE GETS A BOWL!)....overall 47 MAC wins in 11 years (with three years in an unbalanced schedule where they only played 7 MAC games)

Frank Solich took a dormant program...maybe not as dormant as NIU....and built it into a MAC East contender just about every year...winning 3 MAC East titles...playing in 7 bowl games (in the EVERYONE GETS A BOWL GAME era)....overall 53 MAC wins in 11 years.

Trevor Rees (Kent)...zero in 13 years from 1951-1963
Frank Solich (OU)....zero in 11 years....played for 3 MACC
Joe Novak (NIU)....zero in 11 years...played for 3 MACC

Honorable Mention:
Lee Owens (Akron)...zero in 9 years
Don Nehlen (BG)....zero in 9 years
Randy Walker (MU)...zero in 9 years...played for 1 MACC
So if Frank is unable to win a MACC this year....he will tied for the longest tenured coach in MAC history to not win a MAC title. Not exactly elite company in a not-so-elite league.
Nehlen = good coach. 30 years, 202-128, avg 6.7-4.3, 1 Conf Championship (WVU), BG record 53-35, WVU record 149-93.

Grobe = good coach. 20 years, 117-121-1, avg 5.8-6.0, 1 Conf Championship, (Wake), Ohio record 33-33, Wake Record 77-82, Baylor 7-6.

Solich = good coach. 18 years 146-86, avg 8.1-4.7, 1 Conf Championship (Nebraska) Ohio record 88-67, Nebraska record 58-19.

Note. Three good coaches. 57 years coaching MAC, Big East, Big 12, or ACC, three conf championships, 57/3=19. 1 per every 19 years.
Stop. Just stop.

Nehlen spent over half his WVU coaching career as an independent...so 11 of those years he was unable to win a league title because there was no league title to win.

He spent the last 10 years in a league that produced a team that either won or played for the national title 4 times and that produced 26 teams that finished the season ranked in the top 25. (Compare that to Solich's 12 years in the MAC where 3 teams have finished the season ranked)

Full disclosure...I grew up in WV and have been a WVU fan for years. And no, I don't think Nehlen was an elite coach or even a great coach. But he is in the CFB Hall of Fame.
I think WVU fans remember him for turning WVU into a nationally recognized program. He took a program that had some regional recognition and made the nation stand up and take notice.

But I'm sure a lot of WVU fans also still have the bad taste of 10 years where they were pre-season Top 25 and finished in the Top 25 only 3 of those seasons.

So by the time he retired, there had been quite a few rumblings about "his time is over"

But two 11-0 seasons and two shots at a national title laid the groundwork for what Rich Rod elevated and what Bill Stewart and Dana Holgerson have continued. They aren't in the Big 12 because they were a floundering program in the 90's and into the 2000s. It's because they had built a strong program. Remember, the Big 12 took them even though they didn't have any TV market attached to them. They aren't Rutgers and Maryland, where the B1G took them just to get NYC and Wash DC TV markets for BTN. All WVU brought with them was a respectable football and basketball program that have been very competitive in the Big 12 since arriving.

What has Ohio done since Frank Solich has taken over? Yes, Ohio is a very competitive program in one of the worst FBS leagues that hasn't won a league title in nearly 50 years. Does that make Solich a bad coach? No. Never said that. But I think it's getting pretty apparent that he has taken Ohio as far as he can. We are what we are. An 8-5, 5-3/6-2 program against traditionally pretty weak schedules. Those are just the facts. We aren't a MAC powerhouse. We don't rule the league. You don't think had Brady Hoke stayed at Ball State for 12 years, they wouldn't have had a run of title or title game appearances? Turner Gill at Buffalo? Dave Doeren or Jerry Kill at NIU? Dino Babers at BG? PJ Fleck at WMU?

Solich is what he is. A good football coach. But he hasn't exactly rolled into the MAC and grabbed it by throat and turned Ohio into a national powerhouse.

We are who we are. Quit trying to elevate Ohio or Solich to something like WVU?
Nehlen = good coach. 30 years, 202-128, avg 6.7-4.3, 1 Conf Championship (WVU), BG record 53-35, WVU record 149-93.

Grobe = good coach. 20 years, 117-121-1, avg 5.8-6.0, 1 Conf Championship, (Wake), Ohio record 33-33, Wake Record 77-82, Baylor 7-6.

Solich = good coach. 18 years 146-86, avg 8.1-4.7, 1 Conf Championship (Nebraska) Ohio record 88-67, Nebraska record 58-19.

Note. Three good coaches. 57 years coaching MAC, Big East, Big 12, or ACC, three conf championships, 57/3=19. 1 per every 19 years.
mail
bshot44
5/19/2017 3:09 PM
Bcat2 wrote:expand_more
It's really hard to take this "poll" by Athlon's serious.

Frank = 13th yr

No other coach has more than 5 yrs of tenure at a MAC school

Jinks (BG) - 2nd yr
Candle (UT)-2nd yr
Creighton (EMU) - 4th yr
Martin (MU) - 4th yr
Carey (NIU) - 6th yr
Bowden (UA) - 6th yr
Haynes (Kent) - 5th yr
Leipold (UB) - 3rd yr
Neu (BSU) - 2nd yr
Lester (WMU) - 1st yr
Bonamego (CMU) - 3rd yr

How many of these coaches, if given 12 yrs, would have at least one MACC?

I don't know....and I doubt we ever will. Why? Because coaches typically don't spend 12 yrs in the MAC!

So by seniority, Frank wins this "poll" by Athlons. No other coach, except for maybe Carey and Bowden, have a body of work that are able to be judged against Frank's. It's not because Frank has been so ultra-successful...it's because he has 7 YEARS ON EVERY OTHER COACH IN THE LEAGUE.

Do I think Jason Candle wins multiple MACC if he stays at Toledo for 12 years.....yep.

Do I think the same for Chuck Martin at Miami...yep.

Do I think the same for Mike Jinks at BG....maybe.

I'd take the vegas line that every coach on here, except for maybe Bowden & Haynes, might win a MACC if given 12 years at their respective school.

Do I think Frank ever wins one at Ohio.....probably not. Proof is in the track record. If he hasn't won one in 12 years, I don't think it's coming. This isn't the SEC or the B1G. It's the MAC. 12 years is more than enough time to fall into a MACC.

Does this mean Frank is a bad coach. No. Simple answer...no.

Does this poll mean Frank is an exemplary coach. I would say no as well.

He's a pretty good football coach. Not a great one. Is the best Ohio has had in 30 yrs....without question. But it's apples and oranges to compare him to Hess or Peden. Totally different eras. Totally different job descriptions now. Running a program in 2017 is much, much different than it was in 1968 or 1958.

And for the record...I looked this up before last season....

Again....Solich one of only three coaches in MAC HISTORY to not win a MAC title in 10+ yrs in the MAC.

Head Coaches with 10+ yrs tenure in MAC

Herb Deromedi (CMU)....he won 3 in 16 years
Bill Hess (OU)...won 4 in his first 11 years....but did not win one his last 9 years
Jim Harkema (EMU)...won 1 in 11 years
Bill Doolittle (WMU)...1 in 11 years
Gary Blackney (BG)...won 2 in 10 years
Paul Schudel (BSU)...won 2 in 10 years
Gary Pinkel (UT)...won 1 in his 10 years....played for 3 others in MACC
Al Molde (WMU)....won 1 in 10 years
Doyt Perry (BG)...won 5 in 10 years

Only 3 coaches in MAC history have coached 10+ years and failed to win a MAC title. The first is from the wayback machine....1951-63 before the MACC. The other two have a somwehat similar career.....

Joe Novak resurrected NIU from a 1-10, 0-11 team his first two years into a MAC West contender in 6 of his last 7 years....he bottomed out his final year going 2-10. But he certainly laid the foundation for Husky success going forward, playing in 3 MACC games and 2 bowl games (before the era of EVERYONE WITH A PULSE GETS A BOWL!)....overall 47 MAC wins in 11 years (with three years in an unbalanced schedule where they only played 7 MAC games)

Frank Solich took a dormant program...maybe not as dormant as NIU....and built it into a MAC East contender just about every year...winning 3 MAC East titles...playing in 7 bowl games (in the EVERYONE GETS A BOWL GAME era)....overall 53 MAC wins in 11 years.

Trevor Rees (Kent)...zero in 13 years from 1951-1963
Frank Solich (OU)....zero in 11 years....played for 3 MACC
Joe Novak (NIU)....zero in 11 years...played for 3 MACC

Honorable Mention:
Lee Owens (Akron)...zero in 9 years
Don Nehlen (BG)....zero in 9 years
Randy Walker (MU)...zero in 9 years...played for 1 MACC
So if Frank is unable to win a MACC this year....he will tied for the longest tenured coach in MAC history to not win a MAC title. Not exactly elite company in a not-so-elite league.
Nehlen = good coach. 30 years, 202-128, avg 6.7-4.3, 1 Conf Championship (WVU), BG record 53-35, WVU record 149-93.

Grobe = good coach. 20 years, 117-121-1, avg 5.8-6.0, 1 Conf Championship, (Wake), Ohio record 33-33, Wake Record 77-82, Baylor 7-6.

Solich = good coach. 18 years 146-86, avg 8.1-4.7, 1 Conf Championship (Nebraska) Ohio record 88-67, Nebraska record 58-19.

Note. Three good coaches. 57 years coaching MAC, Big East, Big 12, or ACC, three conf championships, 57/3=19. 1 per every 19 years.
Stop. Just stop.

Nehlen spent over half his WVU coaching career as an independent...so 11 of those years he was unable to win a league title because there was no league title to win.

He spent the last 10 years in a league that produced a team that either won or played for the national title 4 times and that produced 26 teams that finished the season ranked in the top 25. (Compare that to Solich's 12 years in the MAC where 3 teams have finished the season ranked)

Full disclosure...I grew up in WV and have been a WVU fan for years. And no, I don't think Nehlen was an elite coach or even a great coach. But he is in the CFB Hall of Fame.
I think WVU fans remember him for turning WVU into a nationally recognized program. He took a program that had some regional recognition and made the nation stand up and take notice.

But I'm sure a lot of WVU fans also still have the bad taste of 10 years where they were pre-season Top 25 and finished in the Top 25 only 3 of those seasons.

So by the time he retired, there had been quite a few rumblings about "his time is over"

But two 11-0 seasons and two shots at a national title laid the groundwork for what Rich Rod elevated and what Bill Stewart and Dana Holgerson have continued. They aren't in the Big 12 because they were a floundering program in the 90's and into the 2000s. It's because they had built a strong program. Remember, the Big 12 took them even though they didn't have any TV market attached to them. They aren't Rutgers and Maryland, where the B1G took them just to get NYC and Wash DC TV markets for BTN. All WVU brought with them was a respectable football and basketball program that have been very competitive in the Big 12 since arriving.

What has Ohio done since Frank Solich has taken over? Yes, Ohio is a very competitive program in one of the worst FBS leagues that hasn't won a league title in nearly 50 years. Does that make Solich a bad coach? No. Never said that. But I think it's getting pretty apparent that he has taken Ohio as far as he can. We are what we are. An 8-5, 5-3/6-2 program against traditionally pretty weak schedules. Those are just the facts. We aren't a MAC powerhouse. We don't rule the league. You don't think had Brady Hoke stayed at Ball State for 12 years, they wouldn't have had a run of title or title game appearances? Turner Gill at Buffalo? Dave Doeren or Jerry Kill at NIU? Dino Babers at BG? PJ Fleck at WMU?

Solich is what he is. A good football coach. But he hasn't exactly rolled into the MAC and grabbed it by throat and turned Ohio into a national powerhouse.

We are who we are. Quit trying to elevate Ohio or Solich to something like WVU?
Nehlen = good coach. 30 years, 202-128, avg 6.7-4.3, 1 Conf Championship (WVU), BG record 53-35, WVU record 149-93.

Grobe = good coach. 20 years, 117-121-1, avg 5.8-6.0, 1 Conf Championship, (Wake), Ohio record 33-33, Wake Record 77-82, Baylor 7-6.

Solich = good coach. 18 years 146-86, avg 8.1-4.7, 1 Conf Championship (Nebraska) Ohio record 88-67, Nebraska record 58-19.

Note. Three good coaches. 57 years coaching MAC, Big East, Big 12, or ACC, three conf championships, 57/3=19. 1 per every 19 years.
Stop. Just stop.

Nehlen spent over half his WVU coaching career as an independent...so 11 of those years he was unable to win a league title because there was no league title to win.

He spent the last 10 years in a league that produced a team that either won or played for the national title 4 times and that produced 26 teams that finished the season ranked in the top 25. (Compare that to Solich's 12 years in the MAC where 3 teams have finished the season ranked)

Full disclosure...I grew up in WV and have been a WVU fan for years. And no, I don't think Nehlen was an elite coach or even a great coach. But he is in the CFB Hall of Fame.
I think WVU fans remember him for turning WVU into a nationally recognized program. He took a program that had some regional recognition and made the nation stand up and take notice.

But I'm sure a lot of WVU fans also still have the bad taste of 10 years where they were pre-season Top 25 and finished in the Top 25 only 3 of those seasons.

So by the time he retired, there had been quite a few rumblings about "his time is over"

But two 11-0 seasons and two shots at a national title laid the groundwork for what Rich Rod elevated and what Bill Stewart and Dana Holgerson have continued. They aren't in the Big 12 because they were a floundering program in the 90's and into the 2000s. It's because they had built a strong program. Remember, the Big 12 took them even though they didn't have any TV market attached to them. They aren't Rutgers and Maryland, where the B1G took them just to get NYC and Wash DC TV markets for BTN. All WVU brought with them was a respectable football and basketball program that have been very competitive in the Big 12 since arriving.

What has Ohio done since Frank Solich has taken over? Yes, Ohio is a very competitive program in one of the worst FBS leagues that hasn't won a league title in nearly 50 years. Does that make Solich a bad coach? No. Never said that. But I think it's getting pretty apparent that he has taken Ohio as far as he can. We are what we are. An 8-5, 5-3/6-2 program against traditionally pretty weak schedules. Those are just the facts. We aren't a MAC powerhouse. We don't rule the league. You don't think had Brady Hoke stayed at Ball State for 12 years, they wouldn't have had a run of title or title game appearances? Turner Gill at Buffalo? Dave Doeren or Jerry Kill at NIU? Dino Babers at BG? PJ Fleck at WMU?

Solich is what he is. A good football coach. But he hasn't exactly rolled into the MAC and grabbed it by throat and turned Ohio into a national powerhouse.

We are who we are. Quit trying to elevate Ohio or Solich to something like WVU?
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
5/19/2017 9:29 PM
Bcat2--At some point...at some point....you have to acknowledge reality and the truth, no matter how contrary to your worldview they are.

bshot44--You've got game.
mail
person
Sam bobcat
5/19/2017 10:30 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Bcat2--At some point...at some point....you have to acknowledge reality and the truth, no matter how contrary to your worldview they are.

bshot44--You've got game.

You may have, at some point, been an Ohio football fan. But somewhere along the way you changed. Now your just a heckler of Ohio football fans.
mail
person
L.C.
5/19/2017 10:31 PM
The odd thing here is that, while bshot and bcat appear to be arguing, their positions are almost identical. Both seem to be saying that both Solich and Nehlen were good, but not great coaches, that laid the foundation for future success at their respective schools.
mail
bshot44
5/20/2017 2:10 AM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
The odd thing here is that, while bshot and bcat appear to be arguing, their positions are almost identical. Both seem to be saying that both Solich and Nehlen were good, but not great coaches, that laid the foundation for future success at their respective schools.
Wouldn't say almost identical. While Nehlen laid groundwork, he also accomplished a helluva lot during his 21 yrs at WVU. Much more than Solich has or probably ever will at Ohio. My point is that they shouldn't be compared.

Bcat2, as usual, is trying to paint me as a "Frank sucks, Fire Solich" guy when all I've said is Frank/Ohio are who they are ... 8-5, 5-3/6-2 coach/program. Nothing more, nothing less
Last Edited: 5/20/2017 2:13:22 AM by bshot44
mail
person
Bcat2
5/20/2017 7:03 AM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
The odd thing here is that, while bshot and bcat appear to be arguing, their positions are almost identical. Both seem to be saying that both Solich and Nehlen were good, but not great coaches, that laid the foundation for future success at their respective schools.
Wouldn't say almost identical. While Nehlen laid groundwork, he also accomplished a helluva lot during his 21 yrs at WVU. Much more than Solich has or probably ever will at Ohio. My point is that they shouldn't be compared.

Bcat2, as usual, is trying to paint me as a "Frank sucks, Fire Solich" guy when all I've said is Frank/Ohio are who they are ... 8-5, 5-3/6-2 coach/program. Nothing more, nothing less
Nehlen = good coach. 30 years, 202-128, avg 6.7-4.3, 1 Conf Championship (WVU), BG record 53-35, WVU record 149-93.

Grobe = good coach. 20 years, 117-121-1, avg 5.8-6.0, 1 Conf Championship, (Wake), Ohio record 33-33, Wake Record 77-82, Baylor 7-6.

Solich = good coach. 18 years 146-86, avg 8.1-4.7, 1 Conf Championship (Nebraska) Ohio record 88-67, Nebraska record 58-19.

Note. Three good coaches. 57 years coaching MAC, Big East, Big 12, or ACC, three conf championships, 57/3=19. 1 per every 19 years.

Nehlan. 9 years MAC (BG) + 11 Years Big East (WVU) = 19 years with 1 Conf Championship.

Grobe. 6 years MAC (Ohio) + 13 years ACC (Wake) = 19 years with 1 Conf Chapionship.

Solich. 12 years MAC (Ohio) + 6 years Big 12 (UNL) = 18 years with 1 Conf Championship.

The above is what it is. I have yet to write that it means anything, yet others ........ Oh, Nehlan and Grobe, two fine coaches, combine for 15 years in the MAC without a Conf Championship, yet others are convinced it must be "can do easy."
Last Edited: 5/20/2017 7:22:00 AM by Bcat2
mail
person
L.C.
5/20/2017 10:56 AM
Sam bobcat wrote:expand_more
Bcat2--At some point...at some point....you have to acknowledge reality and the truth, no matter how contrary to your worldview they are.

bshot44--You've got game.

You may have, at some point, been an Ohio football fan. But somewhere along the way you changed. Now your just a heckler of Ohio football fans.

I agree, but it's more than that. It's as if he believes there is something to be won or lost in posting here, that it is done sort of competition in its own right. It's not. It is just an exchange of opinions, nothing more, nothing less. I've given my opinion often enough that I don't need to restate it constantly. I'm am optimist, and I freely admit it. I also enjoy the journey as well as the goal, and I admit that, too.

I respect other people's rights to have different opinions. This board would be a lot more sociable if everyone respected the rights of others to disagree with them.
Last Edited: 5/20/2017 10:57:14 AM by L.C.
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
5/20/2017 12:42 PM
Sam bobcat wrote:expand_more
Bcat2--At some point...at some point....you have to acknowledge reality and the truth, no matter how contrary to your worldview they are.

bshot44--You've got game.

You may have, at some point, been an Ohio football fan. But somewhere along the way you changed. Now your just a heckler of Ohio football fans.

That is preposterous.

I am more of an OHIO fan than all you SFB Solich supporters.

You support him no matter what.

In contrast, I want OHIO FOOTBALL to win a MACC.


Yes, L.C., here we are a battlefield of opinions. And 99.999% of it is very respectful--even if you think otherwise. We're just a group of vigorous fans with vigorous opinions.

But to characterize me as not a fan of OHIO FOOTBALL is a flat out misinterp.





By the way, at some point it would seem that all you SFB would read my posts and those of bsht44 and consider or acknowledge it some teeny, tiny, small way that Solich is not the coaching god which you seem to believe. No MAC title in 12 years in the weak-sister MAC--that's a sign of coaching excellence...seriously?
mail
person
Sam bobcat
5/20/2017 1:47 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
Bcat2--At some point...at some point....you have to acknowledge reality and the truth, no matter how contrary to your worldview they are.

bshot44--You've got game.

You may have, at some point, been an Ohio football fan. But somewhere along the way you changed. Now your just a heckler of Ohio football fans.

That is preposterous.

I am more of an OHIO fan than all you SFB Solich supporters.

You support him no matter what.

In contrast, I want OHIO FOOTBALL to win a MACC.


Yes, L.C., here we are a battlefield of opinions. And 99.999% of it is very respectful--even if you think otherwise. We're just a group of vigorous fans with vigorous opinions.

But to characterize me as not a fan of OHIO FOOTBALL is a flat out misinterp.





By the way, at some point it would seem that all you SFB would read my posts and those of bsht44 and consider or acknowledge it some teeny, tiny, small way that Solich is not the coaching god which you seem to believe. No MAC title in 12 years in the weak-sister MAC--that's a sign of coaching excellence...seriously?

Everyone knows your opinion of our football coach. So when anyone posts something positive about our football program and you respond with your negative anti Solich rhetoric, it smacks of heckling, not Ohio football passion. It also keeps a lot of us from posting more often.
mail
person
L.C.
5/20/2017 2:05 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
You may have, at some point, been an Ohio football fan. But somewhere along the way you changed. Now your just a heckler of Ohio football fans.

That is preposterous.

I am more of an OHIO fan than all you SFB Solich supporters.... [/quote]
I don't doubt that you believe this, but to believe that your opinion is the only one that matters requires one to be preposterously self-centered.

[QUOTE=Monroe Slavin]... Yes, L.C., here we are a battlefield of opinions. ...

It has become one, but it shouldn't be one. On a battlefield there are casualties. Who are the casualties here? The people who used to support Ohio, but who have given up and stopped posting, of which there are a lot. Is your goal that, to "rescue" the program you need to kill it first?

Please consider a novel concept. Perhaps the people who disagree with you do so, not because they haven't read your posts, but rather because they have read them, and they have considered your ideas, but reject them.
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
5/20/2017 3:42 PM
Well, except for one poster anyway, do I tell them to stop doing what they do?

That seems to be what you're saying I should do...saying that I should give up my advocacy.

"Battlefield" is a metaphor here. There are no casualties here in any meaningful sense of that word. My advocacy is vigorous but not damaging in any meaningful way at all.


I'm sorry but when the goal is a MACC--and it is--and the coach hasn't brought one down in 12 years, then I'm going to strongly suggest that the coach is mediocre and that odds of this coach bringing one down are minimal. And, when people argue against those reasonably logical conclusions, when people seem to deify the coach and given that I care much about the program, I'm going to respond, I'm going to challenge the thinking.




Really? When someone (not me) puts up scads of facts and logic which pretty much make it clear that Nehlen was a better coach than Solich is and yet the true believers don't see the rather evident truth, then I ain't gonna let 'alternative facts' prevail.
mail
person
Monroe Slavin
5/20/2017 3:44 PM
My posts may keep some from posting more often so I shouldn't post?

Seriously?

Seriously?






It's a great argument that those who disagree with what appears to be majority doctrine should shut up. So very American.
mail
person
Bcat2
5/20/2017 4:05 PM
Note. Three good coaches. Nehlan, Grobe & Solich, 57 years coaching MAC, Big East, Big 12, or ACC, three conf championships, 57/3=19. 1 per every 19 years.
mail
person
L.C.
5/20/2017 7:52 PM
Last Edited: 5/20/2017 7:53:26 PM by L.C.
mail
person
mid70sbobcat
5/20/2017 9:26 PM
Monroe Slavin wrote:expand_more
My posts may keep some from posting more often so I shouldn't post?

Seriously?

Seriously?






It's a great argument that those who disagree with what appears to be majority doctrine should shut up. So very American.
Over 9100 posts and most are either nonsensical drivel, taking a thread off topic or a repeat of something you said yesterday, last week, last month and are repeating for the 100th time. What you believe to be facts are often your opinion.

Have you contacted Schaus yet? I believe a fellow BA poster gave you his email multiple times.
mail
person
OUBobcat13
5/21/2017 9:41 AM
Had Frank left after this past season, who would you all have hired to replace him? This is mostly for the anti-Frank crowd.

While I have had my issues with Frank over the years, I always worry that given our status in college football and budget, it is always a gamble to fire a consistent average coach to go after someone else. The grass isn't always greener...
mail
person
Sam bobcat
5/21/2017 12:43 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Bcat2--At some point...at some point....you have to acknowledge reality and the truth, no matter how contrary to your worldview they are.

bshot44--You've got game.

You may have, at some point, been an Ohio football fan. But somewhere along the way you changed. Now your just a heckler of Ohio football fans.

I agree, but it's more than that. It's as if he believes there is something to be won or lost in posting here, that it is done sort of competition in its own right. It's not. It is just an exchange of opinions, nothing more, nothing less. I've given my opinion often enough that I don't need to restate it constantly. I'm am optimist, and I freely admit it. I also enjoy the journey as well as the goal, and I admit that, too.

I respect other people's rights to have different opinions. This board would be a lot more sociable if everyone respected the rights of others to disagree with them.


Correct, if you don't agree that a MACC is the only goal of playing or watching college football, and that Frank Solich is the sole reason we haven't won one, then you are WRONG! As a son of a D1 football player, a D1 recruited player myself, and the father of a D1 player, I can say that there are far more important aspects of playing this sport to me than winning the Championship of whatever conference you happen to play for. Those who claim otherwise have probably never played the game at a competitive level. Or any sport at a competitive level for that matter.
Showing Messages: 76 - 95 of 95
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)