Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Official Game 1 Thread: Hampton
Page: 4 of 5
71 BOBCAT
General User
71B
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Post Count: 1,954
person
mail
71 BOBCAT
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 5:36 PM
Just saw the spread....35

WOW

GO BOBCATS
bandman
General User
B
Member Since: 1/5/2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Post Count: 89
person
mail
bandman
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 6:46 PM
It does not show on ESPN3 where the game against Hampton will be shown tonight. Please advise.
OUBob
General User
OUB
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: Powell, OH
Post Count: 278
person
mail
OUBob
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 6:51 PM
It's in there, just gotta scroll past 132 futbol games to find it.
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 7:18 PM
Connectivity is horrible. Hasn't been this bad in about 5 years.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,312
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 8:02 PM
This espn3 feed is unwatchable. I've one connectivity error every minute for the last hour. When i do finally get video, its at least 3 minutes slower than the espn play by play.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 8:03 PM
We cannot abandon the pass because the kid threw an interception . Go Cats
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 8:07 PM
Are others able to see the game now? It won't load for me.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,312
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 8:10 PM
No, this is clearly an espn problem.
ts1227
General User
T1227
Member Since: 2/28/2006
Location: Tallmadge, OH
Post Count: 880
person
mail
ts1227
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 8:13 PM
shabamon wrote:expand_more
No, this is clearly an espn problem.
It seems like a team effort, ESPN3 keeps on crashing out, but when it is working the commercials play fine and the game itself buffers the entire time because we still have a half assed setup apparently that won't work in the rain.
OhioBobcat
General User
OB
Member Since: 1/20/2006
Post Count: 1,637
person
mail
OhioBobcat
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 9:11 PM
Hampton is terrible. And that's a compliment.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,312
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 9:50 PM
Rourke's pocket awareness is every bit as good as Windham's.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,312
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 9:52 PM
Yeah, I approve of Nathan Rourke.
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 9:58 PM
shabamon wrote:expand_more
Yeah, I approve of Nathan Rourke.
Rourke...the man.
Last Edited: 9/2/2017 10:00:01 PM by Doc Bobcat
ozarkcat
General User
O
Member Since: 7/20/2006
Location: MO
Post Count: 96
person
mail
ozarkcat
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 10:28 PM
Please Mr. AD, schedule Hampton again.......and often. Thank you.
OhioBobcat
General User
OB
Member Since: 1/20/2006
Post Count: 1,637
person
mail
OhioBobcat
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 10:41 PM
ozarkcat wrote:expand_more
Please Mr. AD, schedule Hampton again.......and often. Thank you.
You can rest assured he will, and if not them, ones just as bad - if not worse.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 10:46 PM
I really like Wears and Burroughs. Two really hard-nosed runners. Glad they got some work.

Also liked switching the QB from shotgun/pistol to under center. We need to have that flexibility on short yardage plays. My son's team blew a golden opportunity for a TD today when the snap was bungled. They weren't used to the QB being under center.

ESPN3 was ... I can't think of a word bad enough. Covfefe, maybe? It seemed to be their problem because it was buffering and dropping even during commercials. Hope they'll have the whole thing on replay.

Little time to enjoy this. Purdue is playing L'ville tougher than I thought. Maybe they're jacked for this game and will let down next week. At least they won't have much tape of our starters from tonight's game.
LynxRufus6
General User
LR6
Member Since: 8/2/2016
Post Count: 156
person
mail
LynxRufus6
mail
Posted: 9/2/2017 11:03 PM
Purdue looks like a much improved football team. Hoping they use all the gas in the tank tonight and are still tired by Friday
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 9/3/2017 12:19 AM
Hampton might the the worst team I have ever seen play a college football game
davepi2
General User
D2
Member Since: 7/9/2010
Location: columbus, OH
Post Count: 583
person
mail
davepi2
mail
Posted: 9/3/2017 1:43 AM
That team was terrible. We really dug deep for this one on the schedule. They couldn't beat Mt. Union.
OUBob
General User
OUB
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: Powell, OH
Post Count: 278
person
mail
OUBob
mail
Posted: 9/3/2017 8:29 AM
Ummm, Mount Union is good? The arse end of G5 schools would struggle.

I hope we look sharper against Purdue. I can see how a team may not be at full speed against a team like Hampton. Kinda hard to mentally motivate yourself when you are walking them easily.
ytownbobcat
General User
Y
Member Since: 8/7/2006
Post Count: 1,253
person
mail
ytownbobcat
mail
Posted: 9/3/2017 8:57 AM
I agree that Hampton did not provide a high level challenge. But for this season it is a good opener for us to get some very young players a chance to play and get some game experience.
With two young QB's and a handful of first time starters it is a perfect tuneup for what will be a very challenging schedule.
Fall camp was very long and to be able to reward most of the roster with some playing time has to be a morale booster for everyone.
And the most important thing about last nights game is that there was no injuries!
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 9/3/2017 9:00 AM
OU has plenty of history of not taking care of business against "weaker" competition. We dominated last night. The second half wasn't even a ball game. Yeah, maybe Hampton is that bad. Then again, maybe OU is that good.

Recent matchups where we thought we were vastly superior:
2016 Texas State, L (56-54)
2016 Gardner Webb, W (37-21)
2015 SE Lousiana, W (35-14)
2014 Eastern Illinois, W (34-19)
2013 Austin Peay, W (38-0)
2012 Norfolk State, W (44-10)

2016 Sagarin:
Hampton 229
Texas State 201
Gardner Webb 178
Southeast LA 172
Eastern Illinois 176
Austin Peay 236
Norfolk State 237
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 9/3/2017 9:06 AM
davepi2 wrote:expand_more
That team was terrible. We really dug deep for this one on the schedule. They couldn't beat Mt. Union.
Ohio playing and thrashing Hampton sure beats the alternative. Not sure what Akron and Kent State gained yesterday being outscored by a combined 108-3 to Penn State and Clemson respectively other than a ton of $.
Robert Fox
General User
RF
Member Since: 11/17/2004
Location: Knoxville, TN
Post Count: 2,039
person
mail
Robert Fox
mail
Posted: 9/3/2017 9:07 AM
I would like to have seen a bit more of Duckworth last night. I don't see why he couldn't have gotten in to start the 4th quarter. Game was well in hand by then and both Maxwell and Rourke had plenty of time on the field. I wanted to see Duckworth attempt at least a pass or two. He seems to have the physical tools (eye test).
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead
General User
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 1,926
mail
bigtillyoopsupsideurhead
mail
Posted: 9/3/2017 9:20 AM
Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
2016 Sagarin:
Hampton 229
Austin Peay 236
I know this doesn't tell the whole story of a team, but Cincinnati struggled with Austin Peay (26-14), who was worse than Hampton last year.
Showing Messages: 76 - 100 of 116
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)