Ohio Football Topic
Topic: What can Ohio do to take legitimate next steps in football?
Page: 2 of 4
mail
person
BillyTheCat
12/15/2017 11:53 AM
Yeah, I can see the head coach in a living room now selling a kid that if you come to OHIO, you can work in the garden, and therefore eat better. I mean, what 17 year old football player from the city or suburbs would not jump all over that offer????

Not to mention, do you have any idea how large that garden would need to be?
Last Edited: 12/15/2017 11:53:42 AM by BillyTheCat
mail
person
LynxRufus6
12/15/2017 2:20 PM
Mark Lembright '85 wrote:expand_more
Let me pose this question: does Ohio University as an institution want to take the next step in football?

I ask because while most of us on BA would like to see it (since we're football junkies) I'm not sure Ohio University as an institution does.

Presumably the title of this thread implies that the next level is not to compete every year for a MACC (that Ohio already does) but to become a major major G5 player, one that is able to compete yearly for the G5 spot in the New Years Day bowl. Question is, does Ohio want to spend the $ to get to that spot, and if it does, will it be sacrificing some of the small school charm that we've all come to love? I truly don't know the answer; I just pose the question to ponder.
To be polite, no. The university wants nothing to do with being an excellent in athletics. I feel as if they made that abundantly clear when they hired the new president from TTU over the fella from NDSU. NDSU built a juggernaut in the FCS and it’s the main attraction for going there.

Secondly, it’s not like the university puts any money into the department. I don’t think the general population of profs, administrators, or students care about athletics either. When the marching band is the most popular attraction to go to a football game, you know where the program stands.

Now, while I piss and moan because of the letdowns and lack of MACC, I understandably recognize that it isn’t a priority here for an excellent football team. I’ve actually brought this up in my coaching classes, and people have literally said “I would’ve gone to OSU if I wanted to go to a football school”. It’s just not really plausible that it’ll happen anytime soon, and that’s sad.
mail
person
Bobcat1996
12/15/2017 3:33 PM
"Secondly, it’s not like the university puts any money into the department. I don’t think the general population of profs, administrators, or students care about athletics either. When the marching band is the most popular attraction to go to a football game, you know where the program stands.

Now, while I piss and moan because of the letdowns and lack of MACC, I understandably recognize that it isn’t a priority here for an excellent football team. I’ve actually brought this up in my coaching classes, and people have literally said “I would’ve gone to OSU if I wanted to go to a football school”. It’s just not really plausible that it’ll happen anytime soon, and that’s sad."

Lynn- I tend to agree with you on the above paragraphs, but I am sure that there are a few profs and administrators that you ticked off.
mail
person
colobobcat66
12/16/2017 10:08 AM
LynxRufus6 wrote:expand_more
Let me pose this question: does Ohio University as an institution want to take the next step in football?

I ask because while most of us on BA would like to see it (since we're football junkies) I'm not sure Ohio University as an institution does.

Presumably the title of this thread implies that the next level is not to compete every year for a MACC (that Ohio already does) but to become a major major G5 player, one that is able to compete yearly for the G5 spot in the New Years Day bowl. Question is, does Ohio want to spend the $ to get to that spot, and if it does, will it be sacrificing some of the small school charm that we've all come to love? I truly don't know the answer; I just pose the question to ponder.
To be polite, no. The university wants nothing to do with being an excellent in athletics. I feel as if they made that abundantly clear when they hired the new president from TTU over the fella from NDSU. NDSU built a juggernaut in the FCS and it’s the main attraction for going there.

To be polite, if Ohio or any other university hired a president based on the quality of the previous schools football prowess, I would be shocked. Can’t imagine anyone even thinking that that would be the main criteria.
mail
person
LynxRufus6
12/16/2017 10:15 AM
Bobcat1996 wrote:expand_more
"Secondly, it’s not like the university puts any money into the department. I don’t think the general population of profs, administrators, or students care about athletics either. When the marching band is the most popular attraction to go to a football game, you know where the program stands.

Now, while I piss and moan because of the letdowns and lack of MACC, I understandably recognize that it isn’t a priority here for an excellent football team. I’ve actually brought this up in my coaching classes, and people have literally said “I would’ve gone to OSU if I wanted to go to a football school”. It’s just not really plausible that it’ll happen anytime soon, and that’s sad."

Lynn- I tend to agree with you on the above paragraphs, but I am sure that there are a few profs and administrators that you ticked off.
I’m sure there are profs & administrators that do care about athletics and performance. What i’m saying is that the general population is most likely uninterested in successful athletics.

Realistically, is there even a “football crazy” MAC school? That’s the thing about the smaller schools, I just don’t think the interest is there.
mail
person
Bobcat1996
12/16/2017 3:01 PM
Lynn- you nailed it. The MAC doesn't have a football crazy school like the bigger conferences. You can pretty much bank on some of the southern school fans tailgating two days before games and contemplating jumping off a bridge if their favorite team loses.
mail
person
LynxRufus6
12/17/2017 2:16 AM
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
Let me pose this question: does Ohio University as an institution want to take the next step in football?

I ask because while most of us on BA would like to see it (since we're football junkies) I'm not sure Ohio University as an institution does.

Presumably the title of this thread implies that the next level is not to compete every year for a MACC (that Ohio already does) but to become a major major G5 player, one that is able to compete yearly for the G5 spot in the New Years Day bowl. Question is, does Ohio want to spend the $ to get to that spot, and if it does, will it be sacrificing some of the small school charm that we've all come to love? I truly don't know the answer; I just pose the question to ponder.
To be polite, no. The university wants nothing to do with being an excellent in athletics. I feel as if they made that abundantly clear when they hired the new president from TTU over the fella from NDSU. NDSU built a juggernaut in the FCS and it’s the main attraction for going there.

To be polite, if Ohio or any other university hired a president based on the quality of the previous schools football prowess, I would be shocked. Can’t imagine anyone even thinking that that would be the main criteria.
I was more or less pointing towards athletics success in general, not specifically football. Of course I don’t think any university hires a prez on the sole fact of football, but athletics has to be considered when hiring a new president for an FBS school. Hiring Nellis showed me that athletics isn’t the utmost of importance on their list (not a bad thing, obviously).
mail
person
allen
12/17/2017 12:30 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Yeah, I can see the head coach in a living room now selling a kid that if you come to OHIO, you can work in the garden, and therefore eat better. I mean, what 17 year old football player from the city or suburbs would not jump all over that offer????

Not to mention, do you have any idea how large that garden would need to be?
I am not believing the engineering degree. Ohio University is a great school in a great town. Most schools are in campus towns. We have nationally ranked journalism, history, engineering and business schools. We have great alumni that have went on to do great things including playing in the NFL. Ohio is a very live campus with diversity and access to big cities. Blair Brown and Tarell Basham tweet about how much they miss Athens, there are a number of players from the 90's that go back or live there. Crutcher stayed and got his Masters.
Excellence is a better teacher than mediocrity. The lessons of the ordinary are everywhere. Truly profound and original insights are to be found only in studying the exemplary.
Read more at: https://www.brainyquote.com/topics/mediocrity
mail
person
D.A.
12/18/2017 10:05 AM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
...dropping to FCS or lower and investing more in basketball...
http://www.bobcatattack.com/messageboard/topic.asp?FromPa...

Go Cats 105 beat me on thread topics on the hoops board, but I think I win for a hoops comment hitting the FB board.
Last Edited: 12/18/2017 10:05:44 AM by D.A.
mail
OU_Country
12/19/2017 11:06 AM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
The next step not only in football but for the university as a whole is to try and bring a marquee hotel down to Athens that would serve SEO. Think the market isn't there? Hotels these days don't need to be in a high traffic corridor so long as show up on travel search engines. Hilton Garden Inn for Athens, a king hotel for SEO with facilities for wedding receptions, conferences ect. The football program needs to get more fans down to the stadium. If Athens had a Westin, Sheraton, et. all it would change the image of the community to be thought of as a more significant college town.
Of course, with the current Athens City Council, zoning board, etc., the hotel would have to be built outside the city limits, as it could not be more than three stories high in Athens so as not to upset anyone's "viewshed." Perhaps, it could be located in Nelsonville, or The Plains! :-)
On this note, why does a hotel really need to be more than three stories high to be a really nice hotel? Particularly in Athens?

That asked, I agree, another location with conference facilities like Wes brings up would be a big bonus. I think there's a demand for it, but is there enough real demand to convince an investor to go there? One way to start creating that demand: Demonstrate that the City, County, University, and the University Athletic Department are doing things together and are on the same page. Examples: When we have Homecoming, everyone KNOWS it's Homecoming. Yet in the Winter, more than half the uptown businesses have a clue if there's a home basketball game. Other examples: The University schedules Dad's weekend a couple weeks after Homecoming, during a weekend there's not even a real game. Instead, schedule it, and Sibs during the sports seasons and promote the hell out of it months in advance. The University needs to work with Athletics, and the community to make those family weekends a bigger deal, and take advantage of them with home games that matter. It rarely feels like there's a plan to have a buy in with everyone to sell what the University community, and the Athens Community have to offer on those weekends. Instead, everyone just ends up bar hopping and nothing else. It just seems to me like it could be so much more on those family weekends. And why not have a winter Alumni weekend with a basketball game and a band performance at the game?


(All that said, I have no clue what efforts are made, so if there are efforts made, I'd like to hear about them, and give credit to those who do them)
mail
OU_Country
12/19/2017 11:14 AM
My question that I would ask, not just about Ohio, but to all the MAC, and many other G5 schools is this:

How much longer to they want to continue to try to play the arms race with increasing spending? I'd say at some point in the future, coaching salaries and football spending has to peak, and then start to decline. But at what point, if we're not already there, is it worth it to continue to try to keep up with the P5 schools in spending?

This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?
mail
bshot44
12/19/2017 11:18 AM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
My question that I would ask, not just about Ohio, but to all the MAC, and many other G5 schools is this:

How much longer to they want to continue to try to play the arms race with increasing spending? I'd say at some point in the future, coaching salaries and football spending has to peak, and then start to decline. But at what point, if we're not already there, is it worth it to continue to try to keep up with the P5 schools in spending?

This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?
TV $$$$$$$$$$

If Ohio, or the MAC, drops to FCS .... goodbye TV money.
mail
person
SBH
12/19/2017 1:47 PM
Frank has been given the resources to go to "the next level," which I describe as being a dominant team within your league. He has failed. We are consistently competitive, but far from dominant. Frank and his staff find ways each year to deliver inexplicable losses to inferior teams. Akron is the latest and most egregious example. It's inconceivable to me that the staff did not prepare for the freshman QB. It was common knowledge in Akron that Thomas Woodson had failed a drug test would sit out at least two games. The only way for us to take that next step is to correct the deficiencies in our staff, which we know Frank will not do.
mail
person
Robert Fox
12/19/2017 1:50 PM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
The next step not only in football but for the university as a whole is to try and bring a marquee hotel down to Athens that would serve SEO. Think the market isn't there? Hotels these days don't need to be in a high traffic corridor so long as show up on travel search engines. Hilton Garden Inn for Athens, a king hotel for SEO with facilities for wedding receptions, conferences ect. The football program needs to get more fans down to the stadium. If Athens had a Westin, Sheraton, et. all it would change the image of the community to be thought of as a more significant college town.
Of course, with the current Athens City Council, zoning board, etc., the hotel would have to be built outside the city limits, as it could not be more than three stories high in Athens so as not to upset anyone's "viewshed." Perhaps, it could be located in Nelsonville, or The Plains! :-)
On this note, why does a hotel really need to be more than three stories high to be a really nice hotel? Particularly in Athens?

That asked, I agree, another location with conference facilities like Wes brings up would be a big bonus. I think there's a demand for it, but is there enough real demand to convince an investor to go there? One way to start creating that demand: Demonstrate that the City, County, University, and the University Athletic Department are doing things together and are on the same page. Examples: When we have Homecoming, everyone KNOWS it's Homecoming. Yet in the Winter, more than half the uptown businesses have a clue if there's a home basketball game. Other examples: The University schedules Dad's weekend a couple weeks after Homecoming, during a weekend there's not even a real game. Instead, schedule it, and Sibs during the sports seasons and promote the hell out of it months in advance. The University needs to work with Athletics, and the community to make those family weekends a bigger deal, and take advantage of them with home games that matter. It rarely feels like there's a plan to have a buy in with everyone to sell what the University community, and the Athens Community have to offer on those weekends. Instead, everyone just ends up bar hopping and nothing else. It just seems to me like it could be so much more on those family weekends. And why not have a winter Alumni weekend with a basketball game and a band performance at the game?


(All that said, I have no clue what efforts are made, so if there are efforts made, I'd like to hear about them, and give credit to those who do them)
I have to say, OU has done a pretty good job in arranging alternate activities for Dad's and Mom's weekends. I usually get an email with a listing of stuff to do, like hiking, comedy shows, music shows, seems like maybe art shows. Can't remember everything, but it's always a pretty good itinerary.
mail
person
Alan Swank
12/19/2017 1:58 PM
bshot44 wrote:expand_more
My question that I would ask, not just about Ohio, but to all the MAC, and many other G5 schools is this:

How much longer to they want to continue to try to play the arms race with increasing spending? I'd say at some point in the future, coaching salaries and football spending has to peak, and then start to decline. But at what point, if we're not already there, is it worth it to continue to try to keep up with the P5 schools in spending?

This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?
TV $$$$$$$$$$

If Ohio, or the MAC, drops to FCS .... goodbye TV money.
I know that local journalists check in on this site from time to time. We keep hearing about TV money. Would someone find our exactly how much we're talking about? My guess it is very little in the whole scheme of things.
mail
person
Alan Swank
12/19/2017 1:59 PM
Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
The next step not only in football but for the university as a whole is to try and bring a marquee hotel down to Athens that would serve SEO. Think the market isn't there? Hotels these days don't need to be in a high traffic corridor so long as show up on travel search engines. Hilton Garden Inn for Athens, a king hotel for SEO with facilities for wedding receptions, conferences ect. The football program needs to get more fans down to the stadium. If Athens had a Westin, Sheraton, et. all it would change the image of the community to be thought of as a more significant college town.
Of course, with the current Athens City Council, zoning board, etc., the hotel would have to be built outside the city limits, as it could not be more than three stories high in Athens so as not to upset anyone's "viewshed." Perhaps, it could be located in Nelsonville, or The Plains! :-)
On this note, why does a hotel really need to be more than three stories high to be a really nice hotel? Particularly in Athens?

That asked, I agree, another location with conference facilities like Wes brings up would be a big bonus. I think there's a demand for it, but is there enough real demand to convince an investor to go there? One way to start creating that demand: Demonstrate that the City, County, University, and the University Athletic Department are doing things together and are on the same page. Examples: When we have Homecoming, everyone KNOWS it's Homecoming. Yet in the Winter, more than half the uptown businesses have a clue if there's a home basketball game. Other examples: The University schedules Dad's weekend a couple weeks after Homecoming, during a weekend there's not even a real game. Instead, schedule it, and Sibs during the sports seasons and promote the hell out of it months in advance. The University needs to work with Athletics, and the community to make those family weekends a bigger deal, and take advantage of them with home games that matter. It rarely feels like there's a plan to have a buy in with everyone to sell what the University community, and the Athens Community have to offer on those weekends. Instead, everyone just ends up bar hopping and nothing else. It just seems to me like it could be so much more on those family weekends. And why not have a winter Alumni weekend with a basketball game and a band performance at the game?


(All that said, I have no clue what efforts are made, so if there are efforts made, I'd like to hear about them, and give credit to those who do them)
I have to say, OU has done a pretty good job in arranging alternate activities for Dad's and Mom's weekends. I usually get an email with a listing of stuff to do, like hiking, comedy shows, music shows, seems like maybe art shows. Can't remember everything, but it's always a pretty good itinerary.
Mom's weekend - third biggest bar weekend of the year and lowest tip weekend.
mail
person
D.A.
12/19/2017 3:25 PM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
My question that I would ask, not just about Ohio, but to all the MAC, and many other G5 schools is this:

How much longer to they want to continue to try to play the arms race with increasing spending? I'd say at some point in the future, coaching salaries and football spending has to peak, and then start to decline. But at what point, if we're not already there, is it worth it to continue to try to keep up with the P5 schools in spending?

This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?

OHIO is the biggest spender in MBB budget in the MAC, and has the best facility. OHIO is in the top third in the NCAA in budget.

OHIO is in the 50th percentile in FB spend in the MAC, and with many of the facilities being worse than their peers. OHIO is in the bottom third in FB budget.

Is football spending really a problem when we are significantly outspent by some of the programs in the G5 with whom many here believe should be able to compete?

A program like Boise spends more than double what OHIO spends, and any investments made at OHIO in the last five to seven years to elevate the program to a modest level (IPF/new locker room) have been done so 100% at donor expense, not raising student fees to pay for them. You can't put the IPF solely on FB, because every ICA program PLUS the 110 and the general student body get to use that facility.

What data do you have that indicates we are spending like drunken sailors to keep up with the Joneses?

Help me understand precisely what OHIO has been doing since, let's say the new ESPN contract revenues kicked in (and that wouldn't have occurred without FBS football, yet the additional revenues help the whole ICA budget) that in your perception is egregious and irresponsible, and that has been done to keep up with or outspend G5 peers?

Now if by "arms race", you are calling in all programs, then my mistake, as OHIO has increased our MBB budget far greater as a percent since Groce left in 2012 than we have increased any other single budget in our athletic department.
Last Edited: 12/19/2017 3:47:13 PM by D.A.
mail
person
Alan Swank
12/19/2017 3:40 PM
D.A. wrote:expand_more
My question that I would ask, not just about Ohio, but to all the MAC, and many other G5 schools is this:

How much longer to they want to continue to try to play the arms race with increasing spending? I'd say at some point in the future, coaching salaries and football spending has to peak, and then start to decline. But at what point, if we're not already there, is it worth it to continue to try to keep up with the P5 schools in spending?

This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?

OHIO is the biggest spender in MBB budget in the MAC, and has the best facility.

OHIO is in the 50th percentile in FB spend in the MAC, and with many of the facilities being worse than their peers.

Is football spending really a problem when we are significantly outspent by some of the programs in the G5 with whom many here believe should be able to compete?

A program like Boise spends more than double what OHIO spends, and any investments made at OHIO in the last five to seven years to elevate the program to a modest level (IPF/new locker room) have been done so 100% at donor expense, not raising student fees to pay for them.
Not true. $1.2 million in student fees helped pay for the multi-purpoe facility.

https://www.ohio.edu/studentaffairs/planning/fieldhouse.cfm
mail
person
D.A.
12/19/2017 3:49 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
My question that I would ask, not just about Ohio, but to all the MAC, and many other G5 schools is this:

How much longer to they want to continue to try to play the arms race with increasing spending? I'd say at some point in the future, coaching salaries and football spending has to peak, and then start to decline. But at what point, if we're not already there, is it worth it to continue to try to keep up with the P5 schools in spending?

This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?

OHIO is the biggest spender in MBB budget in the MAC, and has the best facility.

OHIO is in the 50th percentile in FB spend in the MAC, and with many of the facilities being worse than their peers.

Is football spending really a problem when we are significantly outspent by some of the programs in the G5 with whom many here believe should be able to compete?

A program like Boise spends more than double what OHIO spends, and any investments made at OHIO in the last five to seven years to elevate the program to a modest level (IPF/new locker room) have been done so 100% at donor expense, not raising student fees to pay for them.
Not true. $1.2 million in student fees helped pay for the multi-purpoe facility.

https://www.ohio.edu/studentaffairs/planning/fieldhouse.cfm

And the general student body gets to use the facility more than 10% of its open hours, so my point stands, donations paid for 100% of the ICA benefit. That was the deal that was stuck to finalize the project. https://twitter.com/OU_WalterFH Check the twitter feed and you see a significant amount of twitter post volume of general student body/ROTC/etc usage of the facility, so I think the student body made out pretty damn well on that deal.
Last Edited: 12/19/2017 3:58:38 PM by D.A.
mail
bshot44
12/19/2017 3:54 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
My question that I would ask, not just about Ohio, but to all the MAC, and many other G5 schools is this:

How much longer to they want to continue to try to play the arms race with increasing spending? I'd say at some point in the future, coaching salaries and football spending has to peak, and then start to decline. But at what point, if we're not already there, is it worth it to continue to try to keep up with the P5 schools in spending?

This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?
TV $$$$$$$$$$

If Ohio, or the MAC, drops to FCS .... goodbye TV money.
I know that local journalists check in on this site from time to time. We keep hearing about TV money. Would someone find our exactly how much we're talking about? My guess it is very little in the whole scheme of things.
Roughly between $700k and $1M per year per school. That's compared to the old deal where schools only received about $100k per year. So it's a pretty substantial bump.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/chi-espn-mid-america...

As the article below says ... a drop in the bucket for P5 schools ... but for schools in the MAC, it's a sizable amount of cash that help fund their athletic programs.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/college/ct-mac-footb...

Ohio spent $1.12M in 2015 in operating revenue for football.

Toledo spent $2.34M.

In comparison ...

Boise: $2,740,037
BG: $877,843
Ohio State: $8,511,260

***Source: https://ope.ed.gov/athletics /#/

Basically ... the $700-800K that Ohio is getting for ESPN is significant money to them ... not to mention national exposure that helps. And I'm guessing that ESPN3 deal they have to broadcast basketball, baseball, volleyball, etc would disappear if football suddenly disappeared to FCS.

I think that backs my original point that Ohio/MAC need this TV $$$$$
mail
bshot44
12/19/2017 3:57 PM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?
Operating Expenses for Football 2015

James Madison: $2,093,030
North Dakota St: $1,049,025
Ohio: $1,122,958
South Dakota St: $659,642
mail
OU_Country
12/19/2017 5:42 PM
D.A. wrote:expand_more
My question that I would ask, not just about Ohio, but to all the MAC, and many other G5 schools is this:

How much longer to they want to continue to try to play the arms race with increasing spending? I'd say at some point in the future, coaching salaries and football spending has to peak, and then start to decline. But at what point, if we're not already there, is it worth it to continue to try to keep up with the P5 schools in spending?

This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?

OHIO is the biggest spender in MBB budget in the MAC, and has the best facility. OHIO is in the top third in the NCAA in budget.

OHIO is in the 50th percentile in FB spend in the MAC, and with many of the facilities being worse than their peers. OHIO is in the bottom third in FB budget.

Is football spending really a problem when we are significantly outspent by some of the programs in the G5 with whom many here believe should be able to compete?

A program like Boise spends more than double what OHIO spends, and any investments made at OHIO in the last five to seven years to elevate the program to a modest level (IPF/new locker room) have been done so 100% at donor expense, not raising student fees to pay for them. You can't put the IPF solely on FB, because every ICA program PLUS the 110 and the general student body get to use that facility.

What data do you have that indicates we are spending like drunken sailors to keep up with the Joneses?

Help me understand precisely what OHIO has been doing since, let's say the new ESPN contract revenues kicked in (and that wouldn't have occurred without FBS football, yet the additional revenues help the whole ICA budget) that in your perception is egregious and irresponsible, and that has been done to keep up with or outspend G5 peers?

Now if by "arms race", you are calling in all programs, then my mistake, as OHIO has increased our MBB budget far greater as a percent since Groce left in 2012 than we have increased any other single budget in our athletic department. [/QUOTE]My thoughts or questions were not intended to be directed specifically at Ohio, but rather the MAC as a whole. In terms of the "arms race", I was wondering, as we see other schools pay coaches 4,5,6,7,8 million a year, at what point is it no longer sensible for all of the MAC to continue to try to keep up with that kind of crazy money in the FBS?


[QUOTE=OU_Country]
This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?
Operating Expenses for Football 2015

James Madison: $2,093,030
North Dakota St: $1,049,025
Ohio: $1,122,958
South Dakota St: $659,642
Answers the question I was curious about - there's not currently much value in the MAC considering FCS from an expense standpoint, and there would probably be a revenue drop as well.
mail
person
Alan Swank
12/19/2017 5:46 PM
D.A. wrote:expand_more
My question that I would ask, not just about Ohio, but to all the MAC, and many other G5 schools is this:

How much longer to they want to continue to try to play the arms race with increasing spending? I'd say at some point in the future, coaching salaries and football spending has to peak, and then start to decline. But at what point, if we're not already there, is it worth it to continue to try to keep up with the P5 schools in spending?

This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?

OHIO is the biggest spender in MBB budget in the MAC, and has the best facility.

OHIO is in the 50th percentile in FB spend in the MAC, and with many of the facilities being worse than their peers.

Is football spending really a problem when we are significantly outspent by some of the programs in the G5 with whom many here believe should be able to compete?

A program like Boise spends more than double what OHIO spends, and any investments made at OHIO in the last five to seven years to elevate the program to a modest level (IPF/new locker room) have been done so 100% at donor expense, not raising student fees to pay for them.
Not true. $1.2 million in student fees helped pay for the multi-purpoe facility.

https://www.ohio.edu/studentaffairs/planning/fieldhouse.cfm

And the general student body gets to use the facility more than 10% of its open hours, so my point stands, donations paid for 100% of the ICA benefit. That was the deal that was stuck to finalize the project. https://twitter.com/OU_WalterFH Check the twitter feed and you see a significant amount of twitter post volume of general student body/ROTC/etc usage of the facility, so I think the student body made out pretty damn well on that deal.
Had two student senate members not "sold out" the student body, donations would not have been enough to build the structure. Lots of lame duck behind the scenes arm twisting. And then we have daily maintenance and upkeep of these buildings which comes out of - you guessed it- the general budget. Don't get me wrong because the indoor multipurpose facility is of great benefit to the student body; the study hall under construction, not so much. So go ahead and "trump" me with your facts.
mail
OU_Country
12/19/2017 5:50 PM
Robert Fox wrote:expand_more
The next step not only in football but for the university as a whole is to try and bring a marquee hotel down to Athens that would serve SEO. Think the market isn't there? Hotels these days don't need to be in a high traffic corridor so long as show up on travel search engines. Hilton Garden Inn for Athens, a king hotel for SEO with facilities for wedding receptions, conferences ect. The football program needs to get more fans down to the stadium. If Athens had a Westin, Sheraton, et. all it would change the image of the community to be thought of as a more significant college town.
Of course, with the current Athens City Council, zoning board, etc., the hotel would have to be built outside the city limits, as it could not be more than three stories high in Athens so as not to upset anyone's "viewshed." Perhaps, it could be located in Nelsonville, or The Plains! :-)
On this note, why does a hotel really need to be more than three stories high to be a really nice hotel? Particularly in Athens?

That asked, I agree, another location with conference facilities like Wes brings up would be a big bonus. I think there's a demand for it, but is there enough real demand to convince an investor to go there? One way to start creating that demand: Demonstrate that the City, County, University, and the University Athletic Department are doing things together and are on the same page. Examples: When we have Homecoming, everyone KNOWS it's Homecoming. Yet in the Winter, more than half the uptown businesses have a clue if there's a home basketball game. Other examples: The University schedules Dad's weekend a couple weeks after Homecoming, during a weekend there's not even a real game. Instead, schedule it, and Sibs during the sports seasons and promote the hell out of it months in advance. The University needs to work with Athletics, and the community to make those family weekends a bigger deal, and take advantage of them with home games that matter. It rarely feels like there's a plan to have a buy in with everyone to sell what the University community, and the Athens Community have to offer on those weekends. Instead, everyone just ends up bar hopping and nothing else. It just seems to me like it could be so much more on those family weekends. And why not have a winter Alumni weekend with a basketball game and a band performance at the game?


(All that said, I have no clue what efforts are made, so if there are efforts made, I'd like to hear about them, and give credit to those who do them)
I have to say, OU has done a pretty good job in arranging alternate activities for Dad's and Mom's weekends. I usually get an email with a listing of stuff to do, like hiking, comedy shows, music shows, seems like maybe art shows. Can't remember everything, but it's always a pretty good itinerary.
I guess my point on this is that I feel like some things could be done better from a collaboration standpoint between Athletics, the folks scheduling family and other event weekends, and the City/County. While I know not every dad, mom, sib, or alumnus is interested in basketball or football, it seems like there ought to be home games (that count/matter) planned and promoted on all of the weekends those folks are visiting.
mail
person
Alan Swank
12/19/2017 6:53 PM
OU_Country wrote:expand_more
The next step not only in football but for the university as a whole is to try and bring a marquee hotel down to Athens that would serve SEO. Think the market isn't there? Hotels these days don't need to be in a high traffic corridor so long as show up on travel search engines. Hilton Garden Inn for Athens, a king hotel for SEO with facilities for wedding receptions, conferences ect. The football program needs to get more fans down to the stadium. If Athens had a Westin, Sheraton, et. all it would change the image of the community to be thought of as a more significant college town.
Of course, with the current Athens City Council, zoning board, etc., the hotel would have to be built outside the city limits, as it could not be more than three stories high in Athens so as not to upset anyone's "viewshed." Perhaps, it could be located in Nelsonville, or The Plains! :-)
On this note, why does a hotel really need to be more than three stories high to be a really nice hotel? Particularly in Athens?

That asked, I agree, another location with conference facilities like Wes brings up would be a big bonus. I think there's a demand for it, but is there enough real demand to convince an investor to go there? One way to start creating that demand: Demonstrate that the City, County, University, and the University Athletic Department are doing things together and are on the same page. Examples: When we have Homecoming, everyone KNOWS it's Homecoming. Yet in the Winter, more than half the uptown businesses have a clue if there's a home basketball game. Other examples: The University schedules Dad's weekend a couple weeks after Homecoming, during a weekend there's not even a real game. Instead, schedule it, and Sibs during the sports seasons and promote the hell out of it months in advance. The University needs to work with Athletics, and the community to make those family weekends a bigger deal, and take advantage of them with home games that matter. It rarely feels like there's a plan to have a buy in with everyone to sell what the University community, and the Athens Community have to offer on those weekends. Instead, everyone just ends up bar hopping and nothing else. It just seems to me like it could be so much more on those family weekends. And why not have a winter Alumni weekend with a basketball game and a band performance at the game?


(All that said, I have no clue what efforts are made, so if there are efforts made, I'd like to hear about them, and give credit to those who do them)
I have to say, OU has done a pretty good job in arranging alternate activities for Dad's and Mom's weekends. I usually get an email with a listing of stuff to do, like hiking, comedy shows, music shows, seems like maybe art shows. Can't remember everything, but it's always a pretty good itinerary.
I guess my point on this is that I feel like some things could be done better from a collaboration standpoint between Athletics, the folks scheduling family and other event weekends, and the City/County. While I know not every dad, mom, sib, or alumnus is interested in basketball or football, it seems like there ought to be home games (that count/matter) planned and promoted on all of the weekends those folks are visiting.
Moving Dads' weekend to the weekend of an exhibition game in the fall after 1) taking your kids back to school, 2) Parents Weekend, 3) Homecoming makes absolutely no sense. Put it back in February when there is a sure fire 10K+ opponent in the Convo at 2. The lines for tickets used to extend out the door and there were truly 10K+ in the house. Throw in the 110 floor show and you have a "World Series of Rock" type atmosphere.
Last Edited: 12/19/2017 6:54:49 PM by Alan Swank
Showing Messages: 26 - 50 of 81
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)