My question that I would ask, not just about Ohio, but to all the MAC, and many other G5 schools is this:
How much longer to they want to continue to try to play the arms race with increasing spending? I'd say at some point in the future, coaching salaries and football spending has to peak, and then start to decline. But at what point, if we're not already there, is it worth it to continue to try to keep up with the P5 schools in spending?
This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?
OHIO is the biggest spender in MBB budget in the MAC, and has the best facility. OHIO is in the top third in the NCAA in budget.
OHIO is in the 50th percentile in FB spend in the MAC, and with many of the facilities being worse than their peers. OHIO is in the bottom third in FB budget.
Is football spending really a problem when we are significantly outspent by some of the programs in the G5 with whom many here believe should be able to compete?
A program like Boise spends more than double what OHIO spends, and any investments made at OHIO in the last five to seven years to elevate the program to a modest level (IPF/new locker room) have been done so 100% at donor expense, not raising student fees to pay for them. You can't put the IPF solely on FB, because every ICA program PLUS the 110 and the general student body get to use that facility.
What data do you have that indicates we are spending like drunken sailors to keep up with the Joneses?
Help me understand precisely what OHIO has been doing since, let's say the new ESPN contract revenues kicked in (and that wouldn't have occurred without FBS football, yet the additional revenues help the whole ICA budget) that in your perception is egregious and irresponsible, and that has been done to keep up with or outspend G5 peers?
Now if by "arms race", you are calling in all programs, then my mistake, as OHIO has increased our MBB budget far greater as a percent since Groce left in 2012 than we have increased any other single budget in our athletic department. [/QUOTE]My thoughts or questions were not intended to be directed specifically at Ohio, but rather the MAC as a whole. In terms of the "arms race", I was wondering, as we see other schools pay coaches 4,5,6,7,8 million a year, at what point is it no longer sensible for all of the MAC to continue to try to keep up with that kind of crazy money in the FBS?
[QUOTE=OU_Country]
This past weekend, I watched the FCS semi's with my dad, and also the DII final. It led me to wonder how those schools' spending differs from MAC Schools? Is there a continued benefit for the MAC, etc., for being FBS?
Operating Expenses for Football 2015
James Madison: $2,093,030
North Dakota St: $1,049,025
Ohio: $1,122,958
South Dakota St: $659,642