A double standard? On THIS board? Nahhh.....that can't be. 😉
I like the feed good nature of this board right now, but this is what I'll say on this topic. Yes and no. Taken in a vacum..yes. 6 foot guard that appears to have not played against solid competition...that's classic Saul. We'd all probably be freaking out if this were a Saul signing. But here is the difference. Boals signed him with Roderick and Price. This looks a whole lot different. Saul never signed anyone like Roderick and Price. My guess is there is a good chance Brown redshirts this year with Preston and Lunden obviously playing point.
With Saul...these type of signings became habit. We'll have to judge this a few years from now. It appears Boals has been on this guy for a long time when he was at Stony Brook. It's not like this is his fifth year of signing guys who on paper didn't have many D-one offers. Recruiting was Saul's downfall and we all know it. I'm staying positive with each of Boals recruits and have no reason to not buy into what Boals is doing with recruiting.
I was mainly having fun with it, to be honest. It's my general opinion that the majority of us who are "regulars" here don't have the background or hoops knowledge to say how good a recruit is until they've seen some time on the court in Athens. Which is why I usually don't have lots to say about specific players until they've seen the court in a game or two in The Convo - I don't know much about them. Roderick and McDay, being more local are exceptions. They look outstanding, and I'm glad we'll be seeing them in green & white. With Price, who we know little about at the moment other than videos, he could end up not working out even though on paper he's a great addition.
What The Optimist was saying regarding the comparison of the competition that was faced by Brown to James Gollon may have some validity to it. Hence my agreement/humor associated with it.
While we'll continue to compare the signings of the two coaches, the situations they were in, or are in with Boals case, are quite different in terms of contract status and what they can legit sell to recruits. To a degree, it's comparing apples to oranges.
As mentioned before in another thread, for the most part, I'm moving on from the past. It ain't changing, and the future looks more fun so far. I'll stick with that. I'm excited to see a guard oriented style, because I think it's more fun to watch. I'm excited to see more than a sit back and absorb it style of man defense, because I think aggressive D, creating turnovers and fast break opportunities is more fun to watch.
And lastly, we have to stop agreeing once again, because I'm digging the feel good nature over the last month as well. Cheers!