This IS an opinion piece. And surely, Arkley is entitled to his opinion. I’m also entitled to mine, and when I read his piece, my first opinion was that Arkley should disengage his cranium from up inside Saul’s gluteus maximus. The emotion in Arkly’s words indicates (in my opinion) that he got way too personally attached to Saul for a beat writer. You need some level of objectivity, and if you want to criticize him as a sports writer, that would be a valid thing to bring up.
I, for one, have grown tired of hearing about injuries as an excuse for this team’s performance. And I’m definitely over it being used as some reason why Saul should have been retained. Were the injuries unfortunate and untimely? Yes. Did they impact the team’s ability to win games? Yes. But the only reason why the injuries were SO impactful was because SAUL COULDN’T RECRUIT!
Over the past three years, if Saul had been able to attract a depth of MAC talent to the roster, the injuries would have been less impactful. None of the Saul apologists (including Arkley, clearly) seem to be willing to connect those dots. They just stop at “The injuries were devastating” without fully acknowledging why. There were nowhere near enough good players behind those who were getting injured to pick up the additional workload.
Maybe JS realized this and didn’t want to continue this cycle of ineffective recruiting. I don’t think we’ll ever really know. Let’s hope the next coach does recruit the talent needed to win AND does so in a scandal-free way. I still think that at OHIO, those two things can be accomplished.
Last Edited: 3/15/2019 12:39:33 AM by BobcatPride