While I agree you're probably correct, how do you end up being quoted as saying winning is the priority if you're not willing to cut ties with a coach who isn't winning up to your standards, and the fans standards?
You do realize it's not necessarily contradictory to say "winning is the most important thing" but then not immediately fire a guy in the middle of his tenure if, due to outside circumstances (i.e. available funds) you physically can't afford to fire the guy and hire his replacement - right?
Would you be happier if he fired Saul after year 4 - because winning matters and he wasn't doing enough of it - and then turned around and coached the team himself this year because we had $0 in the budget to hire somebody after paying Saul's buyout?
Maybe if JS had more money he WOULD have fired Saul earlier. Maybe not. I dunno. I'm just saying you taking this hard line of "ZOMG winning can't matter if you didn't fire the guy ZOMG Schaus is a lying POS" is a little over the top. Everybody has to live in the reality of an economic budget.
I fully expect our next hire to make less than Saul - just so we can hedge our bets and potentially avoid a repeat of this situation in the future where we can't afford to move on if we deem it necessary.