Sometimes the complainers need to be called on things to explain their logic - if there is any being used -- because sometimes there isn't any at all. For example, I appreciate Graf's use of the lengthy and researched "best wins" -- i.e. fact based thoughts, not the nonsensical 'whataboutism' being thrown my way.
And, sometimes, somebody just needs to post something like this to troll all the angry haters on here to get them riled up. I'd say it worked in this case.
If you want to engage in honest debate, it's probably best to not call people names ("angry haters") and proudly admit to being a troll.
Forgive me if I chose to admit that one time that I trolled, or tried to. I'm not the first, and won't be the last person to do so on here.
Also, lets be honest, most of this game thread has less to do with honest debate, and more to do with massive overreaction, which is probably just a message board norm when Ohio loses.
And yes, I think there are some people who seem like angry souls on here that do much more complaining about coaches/players/recruiting/results, etc., than they ever do being complementary or excited when good things happen. Again, probably message a board norm, but it's what I perceive in some cases.
Maybe I'll 'whatabout' my way through the rest of my day wondering what if I hadn't tried to troll, or what this thread could have been like if Ohio hadn't gotten beaten by Purdue. Maybe people might have had good things to say about the Bobcats instead of diminishing how good or bad Purdue is.