Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
4/3/2022 7:19 PM
It seems I'm in the minority here, but I think Mark Sears is a very good basketball player and has a really good chance to be very good wherever he ends up.
The season didn't end the way we wanted to and I get emotions are high so it's easy to pick apart his game on the way out, but this season was his first as a lead guard in college basketball.
And he finished first team all conference, became a 40% three point shooter with a high volume of takes, and nearly averaged 20 points a game. Is he as true a point guard as previous guys we've had in the spot? No. But in today's game there's often 3 guards on the floor anyhow, so that's easy enough to cover for.
I'll take Mark Sears' 21-22 season in first year starting guard anytime. He's strong, fearless, and controls the pace of games super well. He's got an excellent change of pace game, and almost certainly would have had better assist numbers had he -- you know -- had a shooter or two on the floor with him. Everybody has this platonic ideal of a point guard in their mind, but had Sears been that this year, where would our offense have been? Would more shots for Roderick, Carter or Brown have been a good thing? In my view, we were best with the ball in Sears hands and when he looked to score. A lot of blame's being laid at Sears' feet, but our biggest challenges this season were a direct result of our personnel. We didn't have enough scoring, and we had a very shallow bench. A ton was asked of Sears, and he was consistently very good.
I think he struggles against length. But he's still a very good basketball player and will get better against length with reps. In a big conference, he'll get them. I certainly wouldn't write him off.
Last Edited: 4/3/2022 7:23:19 PM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame