Didn't this all start due to up-on-their-high-horse overly critical fans who think its their job as fans to rip on individual players game to game?
I'll admit that I haven't closely read every thread this last week while travelling, but who exactly is it that is ripping on individual players on a game by game basis? I agree that individual college student-athletes shouldn't be lambasted (although we might disagree on what consistutes "ripping" a player versus analyzing his performance), but I haven't seen that anywhere. Overall, this board is remarkably good-natured, especially compared to those for bigger programs.
The two controversial threads appear to be Love's thread after the Kansas debacle and Dragon's following the Valpo game. Love's post only named one individual player, Rico Johnson, and that was for what was by all accounts a fairly cheap foul (I haven't had a chance to see it yet myself). Meanwhile, while Dragon's thread did name a few guys individually, it wasn't anything close to what I'd consider "ripping" them.
Rather than attacking individual players, both threads were in my view primarily questioning the job that Coach Groce has done with this team. And while some bristle any time that a negative word is said about JG, the criticisms are fair. Aside from a one-week run last March, JG has underachieved in his 2+ years to date. Admittedly, that one week should buy him a fair amount of leeway, but that doesn't change the fact that both his first two teams should have been much better than 7-9 MAC squads, based on their talent. Meanwhile, although expectations for this year's team were generally unreasonably high given the talent we lost, and the season has played out so far as I expected on a W-L basis, the underlying performances have been pretty uninspiring. We should never be worked like we were on our home court by Oakland, while the margin of defeat to Kansas was completely unacceptable, even if an L was expected. While the Santa Clara win was a nice one, the other wins weren't particularly impressive, as the Valpo game really shouldn't have been anywhere near as close as it was, and Delaware and Texas A&M CC were about what was expected.
So, in short, there is a lot to question about this program right now. Yes we are young, but by year three much of the responsibility for that falls on Coach Groce. I am confident that this team will get better as the season progresses, but ultimately college basketball is about more than getting hot for a week in March (despite the legion of fans here who think that all that matters is what happens in Cleveland, regular season be damned). Unfortunately, Coach Groce has underperformed in that respect so far. But that doesn't mean that criticizing the coaching staff for its production should be equated to taking potshots at the players. One can question the overall success and direction of the program, while still supporting the athletes.
Last Edited: 11/29/2010 10:43:09 AM by Flomo-genized