With the one exception of last year's QFs, it seems pretty clear to me that Geno is significantly ahead of Groce to date as both an in-game tactician as well as a recruiter.
While I almost always agree with things Flomogenized I feel a need to point out that
a) Kent and BG can generally get kids into school that Ohio can not. This is verified not only by former Ohio coaches but by former BG and KSU coaches with whom I have spoken. If getting less than stellar scholars who do not finish school in larger numbers is our new recruiting standard then we will have a whole new population of players to choose from.
b) If we were to bring even half of those players on which Kent has built their reputation to campus there would be all sorts of holy heck to pay on this board and from those who seek to shut down athletics.
I am not going to even debate who is the better tactician. To be sure, my money might actually be on Ford just because any kid growing up in a house with a man that successful at the head of the table every night is bound to pick up a little bit just by osmosis and a lot by following Pop around and listening.
Sorry Pete,Chocteau, I did not see the mis-spelling before I sent from my iPhone and I actually pressed a v next to the c making Groce into Grove. On the other hand loosing for losing and excepting for accepting is an accepted practice in certain forums that needs to at least be shown the light of day.