menu
Logo
Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Geno to Bradley...
Page: 3 of 7
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,764
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 3:38 PM
anorris, great points! Regarding Geno: he's worth it because they are willing to pay him.
HeHateMiami
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Mason, OH
Post Count: 492
mail
HeHateMiami
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 3:44 PM
SBH wrote:expand_more
We've invested  more money over the past six years to become competitive in the MAC.  If you want to cut our budget and reverse that trend, then we'll become a league bottom-feeder again.  If that's your plan, then it doesn't make sense to remain FBS.  Just stating an obvious conclusion based on your desire to cut football budget by 10 percent and presumably stop planned capital investments such as IPF. Personally, I am not at all convinced a 10% bump in our b-ball budget would make that big a difference in our overall program stature. Not with this coach.


Read it again. Flomo is talking about THE ENTIRE CONFERENCE deciding to rollback 10% of football funds and putting them into basketball, he's not advocating that Ohio do it on their own.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 5:48 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
If we're going to remain competitive even at the bottom tier of FBS, we need to spend more, not less.  If we don't invest in things such as an IPF, higher coaching salaries, increased recruiting budgets, nicer player amenities, etc. - at least to keep in step with our peer institutions - we might as well drop to FCS because we'll sink back into the morass of suckitude we experienced for 20-plus years.


What does "remaining competitive at the bottom tier of FBS" even mean?  Keeping up with the Sun Belt Conference?  Seriously, who cares?  We lose the vast majority of our bowl games and OOC games against legitimate competition as is.  I just don't see how diverting less than 1/10th of the average MAC football budget to the basketball side of things would have any significant impact on our football standing, when MAC football is already a laughingstock to 95% of the country.


Flomo, you just don't get it.  We have been winning lately in football and it doesn't mean anything to you-great!  I'd rather us be winning with what we have than drop back any by cutting the budget.  I'm not so sure that the MAC is a laughingstock to 95% of the country.  Most intelligent fans understand where we are money wise, but that doesn't make the MAC a laughingstock.   Every time a MAC product suceeds in the NFL, it proves the legitimacy of the MAC.  Nobody is saying this is the SEC for God's sake.  Did you notice all the ex-MAC players in the Super Bowl?  And $1 million or more of the IPF money will go to upgrade the Convo-that's putting money into BB-right?
Last Edited: 3/28/2011 5:51:25 PM by colobobcat66
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 5:53 PM
Bradley board overall very happy with the Geno hire.  An interesting comment from one:

"Also, it's pretty sad what's happened to the MAC. 10 years ago, this was a premier mid-major conference. Now, their best program is losing a coach to the MVC, something I would've laughed at if you told me that 10 years ago."
Last Edited: 3/28/2011 5:54:23 PM by cc-cat
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 6:10 PM
MonroeClassmate wrote:expand_more
Congrats to Geno taking the money--I love seeing Ohio guys do well.  Congrats to Kent for not paying him more than he was worth.

Odds are excellent that Kent will get a coach that did as well as Geno...Ohio knocks him out in the first round at Cleveland and KD sends him to the NIT a year later.  Pay Geno $750,000 at Kent to keep him and they  can only hope they get better actual results at twice the cost or pay another up and comer $180,000 and most likely get similar results?  What would you do if you were the President of KSU?


I don't believe that the President of KSU would even be able to consider paying a coach that much money.  This is the very point that will prevent the non-Ohio State state schools (read every other state college who's sports don't cash flow off gate and other royalties) from paying $700k for a head coaches position.

Unless any significant increase in athletics budgets are 100% privately funded (not from students or the state), those kinds of salaries aren't going to happen in the Ohio based-MAC schools because the State of Ohio would not allow a state empolyee to make that kind of money to coach hoops.

Here's how that conversation would go: "Hey Governor Kasich, we wanna' pay Geno Ford $750,000 because he won two consecutive MAC Regular Season Championships.  Now I know our gym only seats 2,5k, but he's really gonna take us to the next level."  Then sit back in your chair for about five minutes while the guy laughs his head off.

For goodness sake, some people on this board were up in arms when Groce was given a $50k raise and an extension last year, and 100% of that money came from private donations, not student fees.  Not trying to be a Debbie downer, but if someone can sell me on that happening, feel free, because I would like to be smoking that Meigs Gold and actually believing it.

I'm all for Ohio investing more in men's hoops AND FB, AND WVB, AND EVERY OTHER ICA PROGRAM.  As borna put it, "swing for the fences."  I just don't see the point of FB's existence always being the reason why hoops struggles to be a periennial mid major power.  It reminds me of the Lewis Black routine about the girl who insisted she would have been able to graduate from college if it wasn't for having to care for her horse.
Last Edited: 3/28/2011 6:14:52 PM by D.A.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 6:18 PM
The line is actually, "If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college."
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 6:28 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
The line is actually, "If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college."
  Thanks JSF, I knew I was close but too many years have passed since I heard it.
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 6:48 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more

Blaming football is easy because football is to blame.  Many MAC schools are already close to being financially tapped out.  Hell, EMU can't even afford to buy out a clear failure of a hoops coach in Charles Ramsey for next year.  Even if we can justify spending millions more on athletics, for the rest of the MAC the money and fan support simply aren't there to justify spending significantly more on athletics programs.

I generally dislike it when military analogies are used in sports, but the MAC is trying to fight a two front war with a third world military budget.  As a result, we have little chance of success on either front.
 



But why not blame hockey? Or softball? Or any other sport?


Because most of the MAC doesn't offer scholarship hockey (although those that do are generally actually competitive on the national level, unlike ont he gridiron), while the other sports don't consume anywhere near the level of our athletic budgets that football does (even before accounting for the Title IX ramifications it creates).

Yeah, when there's only 47 teams playing, it's not so hard to be in the top 25. 


Sure, but with only 16 teams selected for the national tournament, the fact that both Miami and WMU were picked is significantly more impressive than being among the 70 out of 120 teams selected for a bowl game.


And if you extend that logic, I think you end up with why the MAC did what it did a few years ago.  There are only 120 FBS schools; then the MAC gets a pretty good TV package with ESPN; then Ohio invests more in FB; then in 2011 they are on TV four consecutive weekends NATIONALLY on the ESPN family of networks.  Pretty good exposure to reach from what, 50-100 million homes each of those nights? 

Now in hoops, 360 teams  (give or take a few) are fighting for the championship, and are all vying against the same big six schools for TV time, however in hoops, the big 6 are BIGGER than they are in FB, consuming more air time than they do in FB season.

Therefore if you are the MAC, you are left weighing your options for how you better spend your available ICA budget in totality to get all of the schools the most exposure through a calendar year.  In reality, although it is sport, you are marketing your school.  And the best marketing campaign is a prolonged strategy of more exposures.  I have to admit, the tourney is pretty compelling drama, but a year long marketing campaign it is not.

Would it do more good for the marketing exposure of Ohio University and the remainder of the MAC to completely abandon marketing itself from September through December for the heightened exposure for a season that realistically only starts getting significant exposure after the FCS Championship game and ends the first week of April?
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 7:11 PM
D.A. wrote:expand_more
[Would it do more good for the marketing exposure of Ohio University and the remainder of the MAC to completely abandon marketing itself from September through December for the heightened exposure for a season that realistically only starts getting significant exposure after the FCS Championship game and ends the first week of April?


No one is talking about dropping football.  Again, we're just talking about diverting a small fraction of the $5.6 million that the average MAC football team spends to basketball.  Until someone can prove that ESPN will stop providing the MAC its mid-week showcase if we collectively divert $500K each from our football to basketball budgets, then we would still get all of the same marketing exposure from football, without doing it at the expense of basketball.
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 7:17 PM
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
Flomo, you just don't get it.  We have been winning lately in football and it doesn't mean anything to you-great!  I'd rather us be winning with what we have than drop back any by cutting the budget.  I'm not so sure that the MAC is a laughingstock to 95% of the country.  Most intelligent fans understand where we are money wise, but that doesn't make the MAC a laughingstock.   Every time a MAC product suceeds in the NFL, it proves the legitimacy of the MAC.  Nobody is saying this is the SEC for God's sake.  Did you notice all the ex-MAC players in the Super Bowl?  And $1 million or more of the IPF money will go to upgrade the Convo-that's putting money into BB-right?


With all due respect, you are apparently the one that doesn't get it.  For the umpteenth time, I'm talking about the MAC as a whole, not Ohio in particular diverting funds.  The MAC hasn't been winning much of anything on the gridiron for about 8 years now.  So the point that you are missing is that despite the significant increases in football spending, MAC football still sucks compared to everyone at the FBS level but the Sun Belt, and even that conference kicks our collective you-know-what 8 out of every 10 times in bowl games.  Until someone explains how exactly the MAC's competitive standing or exposure in football will slip even lower than it already is if each school diverts a few hundred thousand dollars more to hoops, I maintain that rebalancing expenditures is the most prudent course of action.
Last Edited: 3/28/2011 7:23:22 PM by Flomo-genized
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 7:29 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
Flomo, you just don't get it.  We have been winning lately in football and it doesn't mean anything to you-great!  I'd rather us be winning with what we have than drop back any by cutting the budget.  I'm not so sure that the MAC is a laughingstock to 95% of the country.  Most intelligent fans understand where we are money wise, but that doesn't make the MAC a laughingstock.   Every time a MAC product suceeds in the NFL, it proves the legitimacy of the MAC.  Nobody is saying this is the SEC for God's sake.  Did you notice all the ex-MAC players in the Super Bowl?  And $1 million or more of the IPF money will go to upgrade the Convo-that's putting money into BB-right?


With all due respect, you are apparently the one that doesn't get it.  For the umpteenth time, I'm talking about the MAC as a whole, not Ohio in particular diverting funds.  The MAC hasn't been winning much of anything on the gridiron for about 8 years now.  So the point that you are missing is that despite the significant increases in football spending, MAC football still sucks compared to everyone at the FBS level but the Sun Belt, and even that conference kicks our collective you-know-what 8 out of every 10 times in bowl games.  Until someone explains how exactly the MAC's competitive standing or exposure in football will slip even lower than it already is if each school diverts a few hundred thousand dollars more to hoops, I maintain that rebalancing expenditures is the most prudent course of action.

Perhaps you should be spending more time touting your thoughts on other MAC teams boards since we apparently are not the problem.
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 7:32 PM
As far as I'm aware, the other MAC boards all generally acknowledge that the MAC is sacrificing basketball for the sake of football. 
Last Edited: 3/28/2011 7:34:46 PM by Flomo-genized
perimeterpost
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 3,165
mail
perimeterpost
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 7:44 PM
I can think of 110 reasons why Ohio will never get rid of football.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 7:59 PM
Let's separate football from this for a moment and make this purely about basketball.  Who here thinks we can realistically keep pace with the Horizon, CAA, MVC, etc. without spending money like them?
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,709
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 8:46 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
The line is actually, "If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college."


Boy, this quote is even older than I thought.  Thanks for clarifying, Dragon.  Even way back when Doc, oldkatz and I went to college they had invented the automobile!   A little birdie told me that this quote is from Ephraim Cutler, who had to ride from his farm to Athens every day for his college classes.    This leaves us with the Socratic question: What affect do birds have on college matriculation and MAC basketball?
Last Edited: 3/28/2011 9:00:18 PM by OhioCatFan
DXer
General User
DX
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Mobile, AL
Post Count: 135
person
mail
DXer
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 9:56 PM
For both football and basketball both Ohio and the entire MAC need to figure out how to increase its fan base dramatically. That would answer the money problems. The MAC averages maybe 15,000 attendance in football across the league while playing in the FBS where most of the other schools average 75,000 attendance across the board. In basketball, the MAC likely averages maybe 3000 across the league while a ton of other schools average 10,000 at their games.

If the Cats started averaging 8000 at the basketball games and 30,000 at the football games, then you might have the money to compete at the level you wish to be at. I know averaging 30,000 at football games sounds like a pipe dream to Ohio fans, but almost all other FBS schools (except for the Sunbelt) average way over that figure. We have the facility to hold great crowds in basketball (and have had that facility for over 40 years now), so if we can market the school and get larger crowds for football, that would force OU to expand Peden.

One excellent comparison is Southern Mississippi. They are located in Hattiesburg which is in a rural area like Athens and not close to any large cities. The largest cities (Jackson and Mobile) are about 2 hours away. Yet they have a football stadium at least twice the size of Peden, and they fill it. Take a look at this great facility and imagine a stadium like this sitting across from the Convo.

http://southernmiss.cstv.com/facilities/roberts-stadium.html

Fan interest and attendance will solve money problems.
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 10:17 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
The line is actually, "If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college."
 
What affect do birds have on college matriculation and MAC basketball?


I believe Socrates would have been looking for effect from birds rather than affect
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 10:18 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
[Would it do more good for the marketing exposure of Ohio University and the remainder of the MAC to completely abandon marketing itself from September through December for the heightened exposure for a season that realistically only starts getting significant exposure after the FCS Championship game and ends the first week of April?


No one is talking about dropping football.  Again, we're just talking about diverting a small fraction of the $5.6 million that the average MAC football team spends to basketball.  Until someone can prove that ESPN will stop providing the MAC its mid-week showcase if we collectively divert $500K each from our football to basketball budgets, then we would still get all of the same marketing exposure from football, without doing it at the expense of basketball.


Didn't say that they were in the above quote.  Would the MAC have gotten the package they did if they hadn't decided to commit more to FB a few years ago; we'll never know.  However, I don't think Ohio would have earned four consecutive weeks on ESPNs if it hadn't committed more to FB than its peers in the MAC.  And I think every school mutually agreeing to decrease spending $500k on the same program might be collusion.
Last Edited: 3/28/2011 10:27:28 PM by D.A.
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 10:21 PM
DXer wrote:expand_more
For both football and basketball both Ohio and the entire MAC need to figure out how to increase its fan base dramatically. That would answer the money problems. The MAC averages maybe 15,000 attendance in football across the league while playing in the FBS where most of the other schools average 75,000 attendance across the board. In basketball, the MAC likely averages maybe 3000 across the league while a ton of other schools average 10,000 at their games.

If the Cats started averaging 8000 at the basketball games and 30,000 at the football games, then you might have the money to compete at the level you wish to be at. I know averaging 30,000 at football games sounds like a pipe dream to Ohio fans, but almost all other FBS schools (except for the Sunbelt) average way over that figure. We have the facility to hold great crowds in basketball (and have had that facility for over 40 years now), so if we can market the school and get larger crowds for football, that would force OU to expand Peden.

One excellent comparison is Southern Mississippi. They are located in Hattiesburg which is in a rural area like Athens and not close to any large cities. The largest cities (Jackson and Mobile) are about 2 hours away. Yet they have a football stadium at least twice the size of Peden, and they fill it. Take a look at this great facility and imagine a stadium like this sitting across from the Convo.

http://southernmiss.cstv.com/facilities/roberts-stadium.html

Fan interest and attendance will solve money problems.



DAMNNNN!!!!  he said what I have been saying.....only 2k short on the CONVO.    I like his way of saying it better than my Steve Fisher analogy.......Swing for the fences and Fill it up.
Last Edited: 3/28/2011 10:22:49 PM by bornacatfan
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 10:25 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
Let's separate football from this for a moment and make this purely about basketball.  Who here thinks we can realistically keep pace with the Horizon, CAA, MVC, etc. without spending money like them?


I don't.  And I also don't see the revenue stream to chase them, unfortunately.
Flomo-genized
General User
F
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 574
person
mail
Flomo-genized
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 10:34 PM
D.A. wrote:expand_more
Let's separate football from this for a moment and make this purely about basketball.  Who here thinks we can realistically keep pace with the Horizon, CAA, MVC, etc. without spending money like them?


I don't.  And I also don't see the revenue stream to chase them, unfortunately.


That doesn't stop us from increasing spending on football...
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 10:43 PM
Flomo-genized wrote:expand_more
Let's separate football from this for a moment and make this purely about basketball.  Who here thinks we can realistically keep pace with the Horizon, CAA, MVC, etc. without spending money like them?


I don't.  And I also don't see the revenue stream to chase them, unfortunately.


That doesn't stop us from increasing spending on football...


It does stop us from competing on a higher level in FB, absolutely, but not to be more competitive than our peer schools in the MAC. (and I was trying to remain loyal to the ex-Dragon's wish to focus on hoops)  I'd have the same answer if the question were regarding increasing spending to be more competitive with CUSA or the Big East in FB.

Doesn't matter what sport we're talking about, we aren't going to pay high mid major money for anyone to allow us to be competitive with the next tier up.
Last Edited: 3/29/2011 1:36:13 AM by D.A.
mcbin
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 951
mail
mcbin
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 10:52 PM
bornacatfan wrote:expand_more
DAMNNNN!!!!  he said what I have been saying.....only 2k short on the CONVO.    I like his way of saying it better than my Steve Fisher analogy.......Swing for the fences and Fill it up.


If anyone has access to the clip of Steve Fisher when he went to SDSU and what he did to build up that fanbase (sell tickets, speak, etc) that would be something pretty neat for the group to see. I'm not sure if it was something CBS had, or where it was. Very impressive to me. I think that is what Ohio needs to do. It's the attitude all Ohio fans (& Ath dept employees) need to embrace.

Not saying parts and pieces haven't been done already - but to get the funds, and the full houses, it's going to take a big effort. By the team, the coach, the AD & staff, us fans, our checkbooks, the Athens community, Central Ohio folk, and more. The gist of it was that Fisher devoted his whole being, getting in front and speaking to any group who would listen, about his dreams to build a winner (and fan support). He even said he had pockets full of tickets and for a while was a one man ticket retailer, to anyone that was interested.

I say this because folks can bicker over what sport should get more/less funds, but in all cases, a GOOD argument can be made that each and every Ohio sport is underfunded and could use a healthy infusion of $$$ to become/remain more competitive. I would be more in favor of growing the base, instead of cutting off the nose to spite the face. I doubt any sport is going to get a infusion from another sport, especially since each is arguably underfunded in the scheme of things also.

It's not like Ohio is a Big Ten school, where small amounts really amount to a drop in the bucket. At Ohio it matters. In the case of hoops, Ohio's budget is about 50K away from a MVC budget, and about 350K from being an A10 budget. That's do-able. That can be done with season tickets. That can be done with the OBC. That can be Ohio fans snapping up 30 or so courtside seats next year at $1000 apiece instead of us saying it's a bad idea. Gotta write that check. Gotta buy those tickets, even if you're going to mail them to the BBBS because you live far away. Gotta drag your friends down to Athens and get them (or RE-get) them involved in backing the Cats. Every little bit helps, and when you know the school isn't in a position to help funding at the moment, us fans have to do whatever we're able to further the progress. We're a good fan base, no reason why we can't be a great one.

ben
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 11:10 PM
mcbin wrote:expand_more
I say this because folks can bicker over what sport should get more/less funds, but in all cases, a GOOD argument can be made that each and every Ohio sport is underfunded and could use a healthy infusion of $$$ to become/remain more competitive. I would be more in favor of growing the base, instead of cutting off the nose to spite the face. I doubt any sport is going to get a infusion from another sport, especially since each is arguably underfunded in the scheme of things also.

It's not like Ohio is a Big Ten school, where small amounts really amount to a drop in the bucket. At Ohio it matters. In the case of hoops, Ohio's budget is about 50K away from a MVC budget, and about 350K from being an A10 budget. That's do-able. That can be done with season tickets. That can be done with the OBC. That can be Ohio fans snapping up 30 or so courtside seats next year at $1000 apiece instead of us saying it's a bad idea. Gotta write that check. Gotta buy those tickets, even if you're going to mail them to the BBBS because you live far away. Gotta drag your friends down to Athens and get them (or RE-get) them involved in backing the Cats. Every little bit helps, and when you know the school isn't in a position to help funding at the moment, us fans have to do whatever we're able to further the progress. We're a good fan base, no reason why we can't be a great one.

ben


Word!

How about this: everyone on this board (non-student) that believes that students having to pay the lion's share of the ICA budget is a travesty agrees to donate to OBC the same amount or more that one student pays in fees each year to support ICA.

That should be a pretty good start right there.
Last Edited: 3/29/2011 1:37:13 AM by D.A.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,709
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 3/28/2011 11:42 PM
bornacatfan wrote:expand_more
The line is actually, "If it weren't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college."
 
What affect do birds have on college matriculation and MAC basketball?


I believe Socrates would have been looking for effect from birds rather than affect


I didn't realize that Socrates was an expert on English grammar.    <== That's me with a chagrined look on my face.


Showing Messages: 51 - 75 of 153



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)