menu
Logo
Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: So is Joe Mitchell gone or what?
Page: 4 of 4
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 9/21/2011 12:02 PM
Why is he getting screwed. He committed, Ohio paid for his summer school and apartment and he bailed. Why should there not be a penalty.

In many cases, I believe the athletes get hosed by many things the NCAA does but this is not one of them.
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 9/21/2011 1:26 PM
bornacatfan wrote:expand_more
Why is he getting screwed. He committed, Ohio paid for his summer school and apartment and he bailed. Why should there not be a penalty.

In many cases, I believe the athletes get hosed by many things the NCAA does but this is not one of them.


When Coach Groce or Jim Schaus or Rod McDavis or their counterparts across the country have to sit out a year before working at another NCAA institution, I'll agree with you. 

He showed up.  He didn't like it.  He left before the school year started and enrolled elsewhere.  Let him play and get on with his life.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 9/21/2011 2:43 PM
He did not get screwed. He held up a slot that somebody else wanted. He left us one guy short. he bailed on his teamates. I wish him well but the NCAA has this right.
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 9/21/2011 3:07 PM
There's only 2-3 sports where kids must sit out.  

I have found no sound reasoning for such inequitable treatment.

As for him having bailed on his teamates.  Well, I sure was happy when Bubba Walther "bailed" on Akron.  Too much comings and goings for me to think of it that way anymore.   

I'm now more interested in this "replacement" for him.   Why is this board so silent on this?  Surely someone knows who it is.  Maybe I need to start a topic for that....
Last Edited: 9/21/2011 3:08:55 PM by Ohio69
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 9/21/2011 3:37 PM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
As for him having bailed on his teamates.  Well, I sure was happy when Bubba Walther "bailed" on Akron.  Too much comings and goings for me to think of it that way anymore.
Bubba sat his year...
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 9/21/2011 4:01 PM
I can't agree with Ohio69 on this point.  If the NCAA did not have these kind of rules, recruiting would be even more a cut throat game than it is now.  Schools would continually be raiding other schools. 
bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 9/22/2011 7:09 AM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
When Coach Groce or Jim Schaus or Rod McDavis or their counterparts across the country have to sit out a year before working at another NCAA institution, I'll agree with you. 

He showed up.  He didn't like it.  He left before the school year started and enrolled elsewhere.  Let him play and get on with his life.


He showed up, he had out of state tuition paid by the athletic department, he had housing and meals paid by the athletic department, he got a Pell check check for living expenses that comes out of Ohio coffers. He did not like it. What is the penalty and what is his fiduciary obligation?

If Groce or Shauz or any of those broke their contract, in most cases there is a clause in there that handles that situation and the monetary loss suffered by Ohio. WHether or not the next institution picks that up is moot as long as Ohio gets it's due.

No mystery . It is quid pro quo and Joe did not provide anything to the U in return for the monetary gain and credits, housing, food and spending money he received.
BobcatSports
General User
BS
Member Since: 2/2/2006
Post Count: 1,116
person
mail
BobcatSports
mail
Posted: 9/22/2011 11:14 AM
Jeff, would it be akin to conferences raiding other conferences for teams as now is going on? I cannot see the "logic" in making a kid sit out a year yet there is no repercussion for schools who bail on their conference partners with the blessings of their BD of Regents/Univ. Presidents, etc., all in the name of the almighty dollar. It's all about as "illogical" as the One and Done rule in Men'sBBall. Oh yea, it's all in the name of "protecting" the student athlete.
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 9/22/2011 11:14 AM
bornacatfan wrote:expand_more
When Coach Groce or Jim Schaus or Rod McDavis or their counterparts across the country have to sit out a year before working at another NCAA institution, I'll agree with you. 

He showed up.  He didn't like it.  He left before the school year started and enrolled elsewhere.  Let him play and get on with his life.


He showed up, he had out of state tuition paid by the athletic department, he had housing and meals paid by the athletic department, he got a Pell check check for living expenses that comes out of Ohio coffers. He did not like it. What is the penalty and what is his fiduciary obligation?

If Groce or Shauz or any of those broke their contract, in most cases there is a clause in there that handles that situation and the monetary loss suffered by Ohio. WHether or not the next institution picks that up is moot as long as Ohio gets it's due.

No mystery . It is quid pro quo and Joe did not provide anything to the U in return for the monetary gain and credits, housing, food and spending money he received.


To me those are just the costs of doing business.  But, I'll admit most likely will not agree with that view.  (Although I may never forgive Jeff Mckinney for so publicly disagreeing.  Et Tu?....)

 
Last Edited: 9/22/2011 11:15:44 AM by Ohio69
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,016
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 9/22/2011 9:34 PM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
I can't agree with Ohio69 on this point.  If the NCAA did not have these kind of rules, recruiting would be even more a cut throat game than it is now.  Schools would continually be raiding other schools. 


The absolute key point.  Schools could sit back and raid players after they had a good year - can you imagine the number of schools that would have come after Lattimore at S. Carolina after last year?  And who would get hurt the most?  mid majors and other non "high profile schools." 

So 69, or anyone else who thinks players should not sit out when transferring - you would have no problem with name schools recruiting DJ away? kid emerges as a big time player and... "Hello DJ.  Bill Self here...." 
Last Edited: 9/22/2011 9:36:12 PM by cc-cat
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 9/22/2011 10:07 PM
BobcatSports wrote:expand_more
Jeff, would it be akin to conferences raiding other conferences for teams as now is going on? I cannot see the "logic" in making a kid sit out a year yet there is no repercussion for schools who bail on their conference partners with the blessings of their BD of Regents/Univ. Presidents, etc., all in the name of the almighty dollar. It's all about as "illogical" as the One and Done rule in Men'sBBall. Oh yea, it's all in the name of "protecting" the student athlete.
No reprecussion?  It isn't like those schools are moving tomorrow... they're serving out the remainder of their contracts before moving, and paying exit fees.

The analogy is good, actually.  Even with everything going on in the conference shake-up, the schools are honoring their contracts and the stipulations in them for exiting.  Why should a student-athlete who is compensated be any different?
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 9/22/2011 11:00 PM
cc cat wrote:expand_more
I can't agree with Ohio69 on this point.  If the NCAA did not have these kind of rules, recruiting would be even more a cut throat game than it is now.  Schools would continually be raiding other schools. 


The absolute key point.  Schools could sit back and raid players after they had a good year - can you imagine the number of schools that would have come after Lattimore at S. Carolina after last year?  And who would get hurt the most?  mid majors and other non "high profile schools." 

So 69, or anyone else who thinks players should not sit out when transferring - you would have no problem with name schools recruiting DJ away? kid emerges as a big time player and... "Hello DJ.  Bill Self here...." 


I'd be seriously bummed.  But, a swimmer could do it.  Why can't a basketball player?

bornacatfan
General User
Member Since: 8/3/2006
Post Count: 5,752
mail
bornacatfan
mail
Posted: 9/23/2011 8:01 AM

Many or most non revenue sports are allowed to split schollys and give partials out. Basketball and football are not allowed to do this. They give one full scholly per player and have stipulations on how they do that that do not exist on the partials given by baseball, volley. swimming etc.

There is not much raiding going on in those other sports. We have had players offered through back channels following the NCAA run, to make the jump resulting in mid to  Major conference transfers. Fact. GOod point up there.

Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,124
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 9/23/2011 8:30 AM
My understanding is that scholarships are just year by year.

Why should a kid have to sit out if the scholarship is not guaranteed over 4 years? 

If a coach can pull a scholarship after the season, then doesn't that make every student athlete a free agent after each season?
intrpdtrvlr
General User
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Post Count: 177
mail
intrpdtrvlr
mail
Posted: 9/23/2011 8:50 AM
Ohio69 wrote:expand_more
My understanding is that scholarships are just year by year.

Why should a kid have to sit out if the scholarship is not guaranteed over 4 years? 


If a coach can pull a scholarship after the season, then doesn't that make every student athlete a free agent after each season?


Alright, now you're talking.  I think the transfer rule is important but I'd be much more interested in a plan that protects student athletes from being "massaged" out of a program just to make room for a better player. 
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 9/23/2011 11:48 AM
Good point.
Showing Messages: 76 - 91 of 91
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)