menu
Logo
Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Huge..Huge...Huge...
Page: 1 of 2
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,137
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:04 PM
What more can be said. Gigantic win.
crackerbaby00
General User
C00
Member Since: 3/9/2007
Post Count: 442
person
mail
crackerbaby00
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:05 PM
Well said....
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:11 PM
Hmmm... if this is gigantic, what is UNI?

Glad to see us pay them back for last year. Roll on!
Steve
General User
S
Member Since: 12/1/2005
Post Count: 713
person
mail
Steve
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:12 PM
Absolutely.
FearLeon
General User
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 5,137
mail
FearLeon
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:16 PM
JSF wrote:expand_more
Hmmm... if this is gigantic, what is UNI?

Glad to see us pay them back for last year. Roll on!


Beat Northern Iowa and I'll call it GI-NORMOUS.
HeHateMiami
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Mason, OH
Post Count: 492
mail
HeHateMiami
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:17 PM
Taking 2 of 3 from Oakland-Portland-UNI would be huge. Getting the first one tonight was GREAT! Nice to see what life on the road has become.
oubobcatjohn
General User
O
Member Since: 1/1/2005
Post Count: 838
person
mail
oubobcatjohn
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:17 PM
Big road win.  We can be a decent team, but these free throws are problem late in games. That is a trend we must fix before MAC play where every game is close.  We are gonna lose more than we win if we can't hit 70% and 80% in the last two minutes of games.   
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,700
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:19 PM
Good win . . . we need to keep up the momentum . . . as we move forward.  I'm listening to the Oakland coach's show and he is out of his goard about the 22 TOs his team committed.  He claims that's the worst he's ever seen at home.  He says 38 points off those turnovers.  One of their players just said that our pressure had nothing to do with it; it was just his bad decisions, and "It won't happen again."  Now, the coach is saying that we are a "great dribble penetration" team and we shot a much greater three point percentage than our average.  I don't know if that's true or not.  Did not seem that way watching the game.
Last Edited: 12/7/2011 9:26:20 PM by OhioCatFan
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:24 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
  One of their players just said that our pressure had nothing to do with it; it was just his bad decisions, and "It won't happen again."


Ummmm, yeah.  Isn't that the same thing Marshall players said.
The Optimist
General User
Member Since: 3/16/2007
Location: CLE
Post Count: 5,611
mail
The Optimist
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:33 PM
I'm pumped.
Jerry86
General User
J86
Member Since: 12/19/2010
Post Count: 656
person
mail
Jerry86
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:35 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
Good win . . . we need to keep up the momentum . . . as we move forward.  I'm listening to the Oakland coach's show and he is out of his goard about the 22 TOs his team committed.  He claims that's the worst he's ever seen at home.  He says 38 points off those turnovers.  One of their players just said that our pressure had nothing to do with it; it was just his bad decisions, and "It won't happen again."  Now, the coach is saying that we are a "great dribble penetration" team and we shot a much greater three point percentage than our average.  I don't know if that's true or not.  Did not seem that way watching the game.


We were just under 33% coming into the game on 3's. Hit about 45% tonight so we did shoot it well.

Kampe gave us a lot of credit - noted our W at Marshall and the 5 pt. loss to Louisville.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 9:37 PM
Couple of big things that is different than in years past.   We have a bench and I mean a good bench.  Our bench outscored their bench 42-8.    Not only that but we had much fresher legs than they did at the end and I think that played a huge part in the win.

The other thing is we play defense. For the first time in I don't know how many years we potentially have a very good team.  Other teams really have to work hard to get good shots.  Tonight's high shooting percentage by Oakland had more to do with one very big mismatch who is going to do that to a lot of teams.  But everybody else really had to work to get shots. 
whocaresgobobcats
General User
W
Member Since: 8/29/2011
Post Count: 519
person
mail
whocaresgobobcats
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 10:14 PM
This is a fantastic win. Great job. Late game collapses are worrisome, but at least we are winning games instead of losing them as they did in the past.
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 11:14 PM
Big win. I thought we had a very good chance here - "Did Not Flinch"! This deep bench is great, what an asset!

Was on the road between Cleveland and Cincinnati during game time - was getting too far south of the Columbus radio station signal area with 8 minutes left. I had to stop and sit in a parking lot to listen to the finish - rest of that drive to Cincy was much more enjoyable than usual!
anorris
General User
Member Since: 7/7/2010
Location: Bristol, CT
Post Count: 2,262
mail
anorris
mail
Posted: 12/7/2011 11:44 PM
HeHateMiami wrote:expand_more
Nice to see what life on the road has become.
I know you in particular of everyone on here will appreciate this photo from my whereabouts tonight.


Last Edited: 12/7/2011 11:44:42 PM by anorris
HeHateMiami
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Mason, OH
Post Count: 492
mail
HeHateMiami
mail
Posted: 12/8/2011 12:05 AM
HA. Way to ruin an optimistic thread anorris.
Chuck_IV
General User
CIV
Member Since: 1/20/2005
Location: CT
Post Count: 198
person
mail
Chuck_IV
mail
Posted: 12/8/2011 7:59 AM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
  One of their players just said that our pressure had nothing to do with it; it was just his bad decisions, and "It won't happen again."


LOL! Pressure had everything to do with it. That's what pressure does. It forces you to make split second decisions, some of which aren't always right. I guarantee, it WILL happen again.
Last Edited: 12/8/2011 8:00:21 AM by Chuck_IV
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 12/8/2011 5:27 PM
Speaking of Bryant...while they overachieved toward the end of last season, it appears that they are off to a terrible start this season. 
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,764
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 12/8/2011 6:04 PM
I don't want to rain on anybody's parade, and all wins are good, but to get SO excited about beating Oakland-Portland-Northern Iowa, they're not murderers row.
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 12/8/2011 7:29 PM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
I don't want to rain on anybody's parade, and all wins are good, but to get SO excited about beating Oakland-Portland-Northern Iowa, they're not murderers row.


Please, you live for raining on parades.

I got news for you.  In the landscape of college basketball today Oakland and Portland are good wins, particularly on the road.  And Northern Iowa is a good win for any program in the country.  Kentucky would be very happy to go into their arena and walk out with a win.  Oakland and UNI will both have good RPIs at the end of the season and be helpful for our resume.  Only people who aren't paying attention don't realize that.  I've said it a thousand times but I would rather play home and homes against teams like these three than play nothing but road games against BCS teams.

The secret to getting big teams to come to us is to become a very good team year after year that won't hurt their RPIs and reputations with a loss.  We won't get there either by doing what Miami does (or Western this year) which is to play all the big boys on their terms.  The secret is to play good teams but have a reasonable chance to win.  If we get enough of the wins like we had last night over time then the big boys will start to come to us. 

Last night was a huge win for the program. Whether you choose to pay attention to it is your choice. 
whocaresgobobcats
General User
W
Member Since: 8/29/2011
Post Count: 519
person
mail
whocaresgobobcats
mail
Posted: 12/8/2011 7:29 PM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
I don't want to rain on anybody's parade, and all wins are good, but to get SO excited about beating Oakland-Portland-Northern Iowa, they're not murderers row.


No one is saying that they are. But Oakland and NIU will turn out to be quality wins at the end of the year and wins only help the team's confidence heading into MAC play, especially in road games.
Lande71
General User
L71
Member Since: 9/19/2010
Post Count: 275
person
mail
Lande71
mail
Posted: 12/8/2011 8:58 PM
We keep talking about the big wins against Portland and N. Iowa.  Have we already beaten them?  Seems a bit premature!  Let's take them one at a time.
JSF
General User
Member Since: 1/29/2005
Location: Houston, TX
Post Count: 6,580
mail
JSF
mail
Posted: 12/8/2011 9:49 PM
Giacomo's living in the past. Northern Iowa is #5 in the RPI. Their only loss is to the #2 team. In what world is that not a good win, especially on the road? Tennessee didn't beat Oakland in their gym. We did. That's a program that's averaging nearly 25 wins a season the last three years with an RPI around 50 the last two. They're going to dominate their conference again this season.
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 12/8/2011 11:06 PM
OUVan wrote:expand_more
I don't want to rain on anybody's parade, and all wins are good, but to get SO excited about beating Oakland-Portland-Northern Iowa, they're not murderers row.


Please, you live for raining on parades.

I got news for you.  In the landscape of college basketball today Oakland and Portland are good wins, particularly on the road.  And Northern Iowa is a good win for any program in the country.  Kentucky would be very happy to go into their arena and walk out with a win.  Oakland and UNI will both have good RPIs at the end of the season and be helpful for our resume.  Only people who aren't paying attention don't realize that.  I've said it a thousand times but I would rather play home and homes against teams like these three than play nothing but road games against BCS teams.

The secret to getting big teams to come to us is to become a very good team year after year that won't hurt their RPIs and reputations with a loss.  We won't get there either by doing what Miami does (or Western this year) which is to play all the big boys on their terms.  The secret is to play good teams but have a reasonable chance to win.  If we get enough of the wins like we had last night over time then the big boys will start to come to us. 

Last night was a huge win for the program. Whether you choose to pay attention to it is your choice. 


Fantastic post. And it's why college hoops' system is so far superior to CFB and the BCS. Big programs in hoops  are rewarded for playing quality teams even if they don't have name recognition. 
whocaresgobobcats
General User
W
Member Since: 8/29/2011
Post Count: 519
person
mail
whocaresgobobcats
mail
Posted: 12/9/2011 12:26 AM
JSF wrote:expand_more
Giacomo's living in the past. Northern Iowa is #5 in the RPI. Their only loss is to the #2 team. In what world is that not a good win, especially on the road? Tennessee didn't beat Oakland in their gym. We did. That's a program that's averaging nearly 25 wins a season the last three years with an RPI around 50 the last two. They're going to dominate their conference again this season.


lol not even close. UT sucks.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 41
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)