Just wondering which schools in the MAC have second practice facility. With the NIL reality and open transferring , can you expect to develop players over many years? If we know our donors don’t donate enough now, how are we going to get the resources? It’s an arms race, can we keep up in such a small market with little local big donors?
[/QUOTE][QUOTE=SBH] They all do...except us. A huge issue. When Boals agreed to an extension after the NCAA Tourney win, he was promised a standalone practice facility.
I don't pretend to know the in's and out's of the practice facility, or even the way Ohio is running NIL/portal games compared to Toledo, Akron and Kent. What I do know is that those two schools very obviously have something figured out that Ohio does not because since NIL, they've managed to assemble conference winning caliber teams - on supposedly smaller budgets, if I'm not mistaken.
In my opinion, opportunities have been missed leading up to NIL with how money has been spent. The scoreboard for example one: While an upgrade was needed, maybe scaling it down a bit would have been fine, leading to some of that money leftover being invested into a fund for a practice facility.
The new seats as example two: Even when those seats were installed, everyone paying attention knew that The Convo was way too big for current and future needs. Perhaps doing something to reduce capacity at that time, while allowing for "luxury" areas would have been an option? I'm not talking massive expenditure ideas either. I'm talking about using the current footprint creatively, and using that skybox as a revenue generation tool. Other areas that are wasted space: the area behind the baskets, or the current "press" areas that could possible be relocated courtside -- same idea, find a creative use of those spaces for revenue generation.