Interesting, fun game. Sunday But win at Kent is bigger than beating Akron at home - in trying to get #2 seed. We beat Kent and Miami, but lose to Akron, we still get #2 seed if Akron beats buffalo next week. We lose to Kent it goes to further tie-breakers
Yeah - can't wait to see coach telling the team that on the next All-In episode - Are You Nuts? This is defeatist thinking.
What a foolish response. Sorry to offend you with facts. Where am I stating the players approach it that way? Where am I saying the coaches should coach in such a way? Simple fact is a win over Akron and a loss at Kent puts us into a different set of tie-breakers and requires both Buffalo AND Kent to lose somewhere else. Equate this to magic number time in baseball. "Hey, we win two of our last 6 we win the division. Yeah - can't wait to see coach telling the team that on the next All-In episode - Are You Nuts? This is defeatist thinking. We need to win all 6!"
In our case, we win all three - we get a top two seed - top seed if Akron losses out (no indication of that...but). We win two of three? -- we are in much better shape if one of those wins is against Kent.