menu
Logo
Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Overreact to the Buffalo win here...
Page: 1 of 2
postlikeTrent
General User
T
Member Since: 3/2/2005
Post Count: 31
person
mail
postlikeTrent
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:18 PM
We have turned the corner!

The road woes are over, we're going to sweep through the last three games and grab the #2 seed.

Then its onto Cleveland where we will dominate...
LoganElm_grad09
General User
LE09
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: South Bloomingville, OH
Post Count: 934
person
mail
LoganElm_grad09
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:21 PM
WWWWOOOOOOOOOO ;; FREAKING HOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Or we could go the Howard Dean route.  I have no idea how to spell what he did.
Last Edited: 2/22/2012 9:22:46 PM by LoganElm_grad09
Buster
General User
Member Since: 12/21/2007
Post Count: 405
mail
Buster
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:22 PM
Can't go into Cleveland with our heads too big.  As we saw before, getting into foul trouble like tonight is not going to result in a W vs Akron.  Also, were still too dependent on the 3, but the rebounding effort tonight was tremendous and got us the big W.
Last Edited: 2/22/2012 9:22:52 PM by Buster
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:22 PM
LoganElm_grad09 wrote:expand_more
WWWWOOOOOOOOOO FREAKING HOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Or we could go the Howard Dean route. I have no idea how to spell what he did.
WE CAN WIN OUT!
Chicken George
General User
CG
Member Since: 1/3/2005
Post Count: 766
person
mail
Chicken George
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:23 PM
ah, forget it
Last Edited: 2/22/2012 9:24:10 PM by Chicken George
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:24 PM
Buster wrote:expand_more
Can't go into Cleveland with our heads too big. As we saw before, getting into foul trouble like tonight is not going to result in a W. Also, were still too dependent on the 3, but the rebounding effort tonight was tremendous and got us the big W.
To me tonight the key was CONSISTENT ENERGY - can't always hit on all cylanders - but as long as we're hittin' on most, most of the time..........and keeping the petal to the metal........
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:25 PM
Ohio is going to get an at-large bid...to the UN Security Council.
postlikeTrent
General User
T
Member Since: 3/2/2005
Post Count: 31
person
mail
postlikeTrent
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:26 PM
Buster wrote:expand_more
Can't go into Cleveland with our heads too big.  As we saw before, getting into foul trouble like tonight is not going to result in a W vs Akron.  Also, were still too dependent on the 3, but the rebounding effort tonight was tremendous and got us the big W.


Uhhhhhhhh...this is the overreact to the Buffalo win thread, not the be rational after the Buffalo win thread...

We will never have foul trouble again...we are NOT too dependent on the 3...We are the greatest team in the history of the Mid-American Conference!
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:26 PM
RSBobcat wrote:expand_more
Can't go into Cleveland with our heads too big. As we saw before, getting into foul trouble like tonight is not going to result in a W. Also, were still too dependent on the 3, but the rebounding effort tonight was tremendous and got us the big W.
To me tonight the key was CONSISTENT ENERGY - can't always hit on all cylanders - but as long as we're hittin' on most, most of the time..........and keeping the petal to the metal........
well, 'cept for that let the ball roll thing when we wanted to run clock down near the end of the game - what was that all about?????? Somebodies head not in the game/present there!
postlikeTrent
General User
T
Member Since: 3/2/2005
Post Count: 31
person
mail
postlikeTrent
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:27 PM
Brian Smith wrote:expand_more
Ohio is going to get an at-large bid...to the UN Security Council.


We could get China's spot if we win out...
LoganElm_grad09
General User
LE09
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: South Bloomingville, OH
Post Count: 934
person
mail
LoganElm_grad09
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:27 PM
Buster wrote:expand_more
Can't go into Cleveland with our heads too big.  As we saw before, getting into foul trouble like tonight is not going to result in a W vs Akron.  Also, were still too dependent on the 3, but the rebounding effort tonight was tremendous and got us the big W.


My high school football coach always said after a win to celebrate it, but not settle for it.  We can lose the next three games just as easily as we could win them, so it's going to be key to ride the momentum into our next games.

But, as fans, why not be a little giddy?
postlikeTrent
General User
T
Member Since: 3/2/2005
Post Count: 31
person
mail
postlikeTrent
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:31 PM
RSBobcat wrote:expand_more
Can't go into Cleveland with our heads too big. As we saw before, getting into foul trouble like tonight is not going to result in a W. Also, were still too dependent on the 3, but the rebounding effort tonight was tremendous and got us the big W.


To me tonight the key was CONSISTENT ENERGY - can't always hit on all cylanders - but as long as we're hittin' on most, most of the time..........and keeping the petal to the metal........


well, 'cept for that let the ball roll thing when we wanted to run clock down near the end of the game - what was that all about?????? Somebodies head not in the game/present there!


I like the WE CAN WIN OUT in all caps much better...
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:31 PM
Big Mo - irrelevent? C'mon dudes
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:32 PM
First stretch with three solid games in a row since mid-December.  I'm trying not to get over-excited, but damn they looked good tonight.  Only 8 TOs; 9 steals; 36-32 rebound edge (17-9 offensive rebs); 20-21 at the line (according to ESPN).

I don't expect Fiami to win at Buffalo Saturday, but if BGSUcks should win at home vs. Kent, a win against Akron Sunday would be huge toward nailing down 2nd place.
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:34 PM
Impossible to be over excited - as a fan. That's our role.
OUbobcat9092
General User
OU9092
Member Since: 12/28/2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Post Count: 1,279
person
mail
OUbobcat9092
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:37 PM
We hold the lead for 2nd place at this point, with 2 wins over UB and one over Kent.
postlikeTrent
General User
T
Member Since: 3/2/2005
Post Count: 31
person
mail
postlikeTrent
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:38 PM
So when we win out in the regular season and dominate the MAC tourney, what seed do we get?

I'm thinking a 12. Ah yes, we could be the dreaded 12/5 for....Indiana? 

(I will bump this thread when it happens don't worry...)
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:39 PM
For nearly seven years this man has been waiting to unleash this thread on the world.

Seven years.
Last Edited: 2/22/2012 9:41:03 PM by Brian Smith (No, not that one)
postlikeTrent
General User
T
Member Since: 3/2/2005
Post Count: 31
person
mail
postlikeTrent
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:42 PM
Brian Smith wrote:expand_more
For nearly seven years this man has been waiting to unleash this thread on the world.

Seven years.


Biding my time...waiting...ranting about Tim O'Shea as I walk the streets...waiting to strike
RSBobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/23/2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Post Count: 4,504
mail
RSBobcat
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:50 PM
postlikeTrent wrote:expand_more
For nearly seven years this man has been waiting to unleash this thread on the world.

Seven years.


Biding my time...waiting...ranting about Tim O'Shea as I walk the streets...waiting to strike
New POTY candidate, the series of the 2 - LMAO - SERIOUSLY LMAO!
bobcat28
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 817
mail
bobcat28
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 9:56 PM
postlikeTrent wrote:expand_more
So when we win out in the regular season and dominate the MAC tourney, what seed do we get?

I'm thinking a 12. Ah yes, we could be the dreaded 12/5 for....Indiana? 

(I will bump this thread when it happens don't worry...)


Probably a 14 seed.
UpSan Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,817
mail
UpSan Bobcat
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 10:00 PM
bobcat28 wrote:expand_more
So when we win out in the regular season and dominate the MAC tourney, what seed do we get?

I'm thinking a 12. Ah yes, we could be the dreaded 12/5 for....Indiana? 

(I will bump this thread when it happens don't worry...)


Probably a 14 seed.


Ohio was a 14 seed after finishing ninth in the MAC. I think it would be at least one spot higher this time.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 10:03 PM
This could make Sunday's 'kron a fun event.



Even if all the seats next to Alan are empty.
postlikeTrent
General User
T
Member Since: 3/2/2005
Post Count: 31
person
mail
postlikeTrent
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 10:05 PM
bobcat28 wrote:expand_more
So when we win out in the regular season and dominate the MAC tourney, what seed do we get?

I'm thinking a 12. Ah yes, we could be the dreaded 12/5 for....Indiana? 

(I will bump this thread when it happens don't worry...)


Probably a 14 seed.


14?

With 27 wins and a domination of Akron in the MAC finals?  I better see a pissed off Special K on the tourney show if that happens...
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 2/22/2012 10:07 PM
RSBobcat wrote:expand_more
well, 'cept for that let the ball roll thing when we wanted to run clock down near the end of the game - what was that all about?????? Somebodies head not in the game/present there!


You realize that that doesn't negatively affect anything, right?  All it does is make it easier to get the ball across in 10 seconds. We still get the same 35 seconds to run our offense, or run the clock, after he picks it up.  The only thing it did was make the end of the game in actual time 5 seconds longer.   So in effect it was a smart play.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 41
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)