If we don't make the NIT, we shouldn't go to the CBI or CIT. It was an embarrassment the last time we went and it wasn't worth the time, effort or money. If the athletic department reads this, please let the season end.
Can we just stop this before it gets started. there is ample evidence that CBI and CIT participation is good for the program and gives you extra practices, extra tourney experience and extra time together as a team. If the coach can keep those more selfish team members from checking out (gives coach a real insight into true character) like a couple did at Bradley and EAstern then you can use it to build for next year and simulate the next step. Coach Groce believed in it so much he had it written into his original contract that they would always play in ANY post season tourney offered.
Butler was in the CBI.....you know what happened next? Despite disparaging remarks from some idjuts
on their boards which are very searchable they went on to play in 2 national Championship games. This first time poster on the Butdogs site summed it up nicely only to get flamed by a bunch of folks who thought they were too good for the CBI. They played Delaware, Penn and Pitt and parlayed that into a National Championship run....oops make that 2.
If you are not convinced by anything I have said so far consider Wright State.. ..thought they were too good for the CBI and turned down the bid ......going places aren't they?....and lastly.... we played post season in 08 and 11. I know for fact both of those years provided lessons and experience that had a lasting effect on the kids who participated.
ALet's just stop with the "it's an insult to play in these tourneys" before it even gets started. All it shows is how little you know about the world of college basketball and what they provide to building a program.