Ohio Basketball Topic
Topic: Coach Boals
Page: 3 of 5
mail
person
FJC31
10/10/2023 4:30 PM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
Many of you are seeing things that aren't there. If you owned a business and you had a department that either lost money or broke even, would that department head/manager be the highest paid in your company? We are a university and athletics are not our mission. They are an extra-curricular activity. Our president should be the highest paid person. I think many of you have dreams that if we just get the right coach and pay big money, that one day we will be the next Gonzaga. Then you can wear your Ohio gear to Hooters and strut your stuff.
One of my favorite stories to this argument is Florida Gulf Coast after its March Madness run.

https://eaglenews.org/1070/news/fgcu-admissions-spikes-ma... /

“The primary form of mass media advertising by academic institutions in the United States is, arguably, through their athletic programs,” said Harvard Business School Assistant Professor of marketing Doug J. Chung on HBS Working Knowledge website.

From March 21 to March 25, visits on the admissions page of the FGCU website jumped from 2,280 to 42,793, according to ESPN’s Kristi Dosh. The visits to the school website jumped from 47,067 to 230,985 and the athletics website visits jumped from 8,177 to 117,113, according to school records. This phenomenon is also known as the “Flutie Effect”.

The Flutie Effect is based on the 1984 Boston College-Miami football game when quarterback Doug Flutie threw a last second 48-yard “Hail Mary” pass to beat Miami 47-45.

In the following two years, according to Chung’s research, Boston College’s application rates shot up 30 percent. This has been an occurrence at multiple universities after a period of athletic success. According to ESPN, when Northern Iowa beat the top-seeded Kansas University Jayhawks in the 2010 NCAA Tournament, calls to the university admissions office spiked 30 percent. When Butler reached the national title game in 2010 NCAA Tournament, applications went up 41 percent.

So what has happened at FGCU? “At this time we would expect to see an increase in applications and we have,” said Marc Laviolette, the FGCU Director of Admissions. “However it is still early and taking a snapshot of where we are in applications compared to last year at this time is just one point in time and will not necessarily translate into a final percentage increase. We receive applications for next fall starting in September with the final deadline May 1st. At this point we are up in freshman applications by 27%.”

It's not about being the next Gonzaga (although that'd be awesome). Sports are a university's biggest revenue and exposure driver.
mail
person
BillyTheCat
10/10/2023 4:44 PM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
Many of you are seeing things that aren't there. If you owned a business and you had a department that either lost money or broke even, would that department head/manager be the highest paid in your company? We are a university and athletics are not our mission. They are an extra-curricular activity. Our president should be the highest paid person. I think many of you have dreams that if we just get the right coach and pay big money, that one day we will be the next Gonzaga. Then you can wear your Ohio gear to Hooters and strut your stuff.
When the highest paid state employee as well as university employee is a sports coach in all 50 states, why do you keep saying things like "we" referring to its just people on this board. We are doing what every other university is doing at our level and higher. So, every institution in the US that pays their coaches is doing it wrong? While Capital University is doing it right?
mail
person
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
10/10/2023 5:31 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Many of you are seeing things that aren't there. If you owned a business and you had a department that either lost money or broke even, would that department head/manager be the highest paid in your company? We are a university and athletics are not our mission. They are an extra-curricular activity. Our president should be the highest paid person. I think many of you have dreams that if we just get the right coach and pay big money, that one day we will be the next Gonzaga. Then you can wear your Ohio gear to Hooters and strut your stuff.
When the highest paid state employee as well as university employee is a sports coach in all 50 states, why do you keep saying things like "we" referring to its just people on this board. We are doing what every other university is doing at our level and higher. So, every institution in the US that pays their coaches is doing it wrong? While Capital University is doing it right?
How many of those sports coaches that are the highest paid employees in their state coach at a program that loses money?

Here's the list of colleges ranked by the size of their endowments. We talk about athletics as a "marketing expense" and one that exists to keep alumni engaged: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colleges_and_univer... .

How many of those schools' highest paid employees are coaches? So, there's a model that works for schools perfectly well that doesn't involve making a coach your highest paid employee, right?
mail
person
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
10/10/2023 6:35 PM
FJC31 wrote:expand_more
Many of you are seeing things that aren't there. If you owned a business and you had a department that either lost money or broke even, would that department head/manager be the highest paid in your company? We are a university and athletics are not our mission. They are an extra-curricular activity. Our president should be the highest paid person. I think many of you have dreams that if we just get the right coach and pay big money, that one day we will be the next Gonzaga. Then you can wear your Ohio gear to Hooters and strut your stuff.
One of my favorite stories to this argument is Florida Gulf Coast after its March Madness run.

https://eaglenews.org/1070/news/fgcu-admissions-spikes-ma... /

“The primary form of mass media advertising by academic institutions in the United States is, arguably, through their athletic programs,” said Harvard Business School Assistant Professor of marketing Doug J. Chung on HBS Working Knowledge website.

From March 21 to March 25, visits on the admissions page of the FGCU website jumped from 2,280 to 42,793, according to ESPN’s Kristi Dosh. The visits to the school website jumped from 47,067 to 230,985 and the athletics website visits jumped from 8,177 to 117,113, according to school records. This phenomenon is also known as the “Flutie Effect”.

The Flutie Effect is based on the 1984 Boston College-Miami football game when quarterback Doug Flutie threw a last second 48-yard “Hail Mary” pass to beat Miami 47-45.

In the following two years, according to Chung’s research, Boston College’s application rates shot up 30 percent. This has been an occurrence at multiple universities after a period of athletic success. According to ESPN, when Northern Iowa beat the top-seeded Kansas University Jayhawks in the 2010 NCAA Tournament, calls to the university admissions office spiked 30 percent. When Butler reached the national title game in 2010 NCAA Tournament, applications went up 41 percent.

So what has happened at FGCU? “At this time we would expect to see an increase in applications and we have,” said Marc Laviolette, the FGCU Director of Admissions. “However it is still early and taking a snapshot of where we are in applications compared to last year at this time is just one point in time and will not necessarily translate into a final percentage increase. We receive applications for next fall starting in September with the final deadline May 1st. At this point we are up in freshman applications by 27%.”

It's not about being the next Gonzaga (although that'd be awesome). Sports are a university's biggest revenue and exposure driver.
I agree with all of this.

But what I don't understand is why we pay Boals above market and how to quantify the ROI on that.

Everybody is talking about marketing spend as if companies don't quantify the ROI of marketing. They do. Sure, there are pieces of it (like branding) that are harder to quantify than others. But Boals makes quite a bit more than a lot of his peers, even those who coach in programs that generate more revenue, more eyeballs, and have more engagement among alumni.

There question here isn't "why do Universities spend so much money on sports." It's why does Ohio University spend more money on Jeff Boals than other schools spend on their basketball coaches.

The answer seems to be that we won games in March. Can we quantify the actual value that had on OU? We should be able to, right? FGCU did.
mail
FearLeon
10/10/2023 6:40 PM
FJC31 wrote:expand_more
[QUOTE=Bobcat1996]
For what the university is paying Coach Boals, wouldn't you want a little more for your buck?


No. He's literally out-performing his contract already. News flash coaches salaries aren't compared to art history professors. And art history professors salaries aren't compared to apple farmers. The talent pool for D1 basketball coaches is severely limited. There's large demand for high performing D1 basketball programs. Limited supply and high demand equals increased wages. And with how short-term and fickle tenures can be - and how they generally have to use their salaries to offset the wages of their staff, they're worth every penny.

Again, compare Boals performance in metrics that matter against his peers. He's worth the salary and then some.


Do you think if I went to Kent State or Toledo anyone's making a comment about Sincere Carry or Ryan Rollins/the basketball program? Unlikely. We have brand recognition from March and always will. That's not to disregard the regular season, but it will never hold the same merit if a March run doesn't exist. Boals has delivered that.
This^^^^All of this^^^^
mail
person
FJC31
10/10/2023 7:02 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
Many of you are seeing things that aren't there. If you owned a business and you had a department that either lost money or broke even, would that department head/manager be the highest paid in your company? We are a university and athletics are not our mission. They are an extra-curricular activity. Our president should be the highest paid person. I think many of you have dreams that if we just get the right coach and pay big money, that one day we will be the next Gonzaga. Then you can wear your Ohio gear to Hooters and strut your stuff.
One of my favorite stories to this argument is Florida Gulf Coast after its March Madness run.

https://eaglenews.org/1070/news/fgcu-admissions-spikes-ma... /

“The primary form of mass media advertising by academic institutions in the United States is, arguably, through their athletic programs,” said Harvard Business School Assistant Professor of marketing Doug J. Chung on HBS Working Knowledge website.

From March 21 to March 25, visits on the admissions page of the FGCU website jumped from 2,280 to 42,793, according to ESPN’s Kristi Dosh. The visits to the school website jumped from 47,067 to 230,985 and the athletics website visits jumped from 8,177 to 117,113, according to school records. This phenomenon is also known as the “Flutie Effect”.

The Flutie Effect is based on the 1984 Boston College-Miami football game when quarterback Doug Flutie threw a last second 48-yard “Hail Mary” pass to beat Miami 47-45.

In the following two years, according to Chung’s research, Boston College’s application rates shot up 30 percent. This has been an occurrence at multiple universities after a period of athletic success. According to ESPN, when Northern Iowa beat the top-seeded Kansas University Jayhawks in the 2010 NCAA Tournament, calls to the university admissions office spiked 30 percent. When Butler reached the national title game in 2010 NCAA Tournament, applications went up 41 percent.

So what has happened at FGCU? “At this time we would expect to see an increase in applications and we have,” said Marc Laviolette, the FGCU Director of Admissions. “However it is still early and taking a snapshot of where we are in applications compared to last year at this time is just one point in time and will not necessarily translate into a final percentage increase. We receive applications for next fall starting in September with the final deadline May 1st. At this point we are up in freshman applications by 27%.”

It's not about being the next Gonzaga (although that'd be awesome). Sports are a university's biggest revenue and exposure driver.
I agree with all of this.

But what I don't understand is why we pay Boals above market and how to quantify the ROI on that.

Everybody is talking about marketing spend as if companies don't quantify the ROI of marketing. They do. Sure, there are pieces of it (like branding) that are harder to quantify than others. But Boals makes quite a bit more than a lot of his peers, even those who coach in programs that generate more revenue, more eyeballs, and have more engagement among alumni.

There question here isn't "why do Universities spend so much money on sports." It's why does Ohio University spend more money on Jeff Boals than other schools spend on their basketball coaches.

The answer seems to be that we won games in March. Can we quantify the actual value that had on OU? We should be able to, right? FGCU did.
Outside of what’s already been stated, I’m not sure anyone on this board has info on the ROI based on Boals salary. Would be a fun case study to know admission numbers after the Virginia win.

He still makes less than Groce and if I had to guess; the salary discrepancy between all of the coaches might come from who can and who can’t. Meaning, Ohio has the resources to pay its coaches higher than Kent and Toledo. For that reason, it does.

We once made Saul Philips the highest paid MAC coach nearly 10 years ago. His salary then is still higher than what Senderoff and Todd K make now. Granted, he was coming off an NCAA tournament win. At the time we hired Boals; he was coming off of 24 win season and in the midst of a 5/$1.875 million contract (let’s say $375/year). He earned a pay raise and we were willing to pay it.

If we had hired him off off OSU’s coaching staff, he’s likely in the same range as Senderoff and Todd K.
mail
person
giacomo
10/11/2023 11:41 AM
Let’s say we paid our coaches in the dean range, 350ish. Nothing is preventing them from getting NIL deals just like the players. The players are getting money for what they think they are worth. A coach could do the same. We as an institution can stay in line with our revenues.
mail
person
Deciduous Forest Cat
10/11/2023 12:21 PM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
Let’s say we paid our coaches in the dean range, 350ish. Nothing is preventing them from getting NIL deals just like the players. The players are getting money for what they think they are worth. A coach could do the same. We as an institution can stay in line with our revenues.
Coaches already do this, but consider that opportunities like this are worse in Athens than for other mid-majors that have much larger markets. Additional compensation within reason is warranted.

Even by the scale of our measly athletic budget, saving 250-300k on a major sport coaches salary is a drop in the bucket. what you're arguing is pointless when we get results that are well above what our budget indicates we should expect. we regularly punch above our weight class in football and basketball. I'd love to win more, sure, but we are competitive, graduate our kids and with of course some exceptions dotting our history, we recruit good citizens that represent the University well. Athletics are worth our investment, which is quite small.

Yes, a higher paid coach can fail, and yes, a lower paid coach can succeed. No one's arguing that, but it's not a long term strategy. All indications are that we pretty much stay within ourselves when it comes to how we spend.
mail
person
GoCats105
10/11/2023 1:32 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
Many of you are seeing things that aren't there. If you owned a business and you had a department that either lost money or broke even, would that department head/manager be the highest paid in your company? We are a university and athletics are not our mission. They are an extra-curricular activity. Our president should be the highest paid person. I think many of you have dreams that if we just get the right coach and pay big money, that one day we will be the next Gonzaga. Then you can wear your Ohio gear to Hooters and strut your stuff.
When the highest paid state employee as well as university employee is a sports coach in all 50 states, why do you keep saying things like "we" referring to its just people on this board. We are doing what every other university is doing at our level and higher. So, every institution in the US that pays their coaches is doing it wrong? While Capital University is doing it right?
How many of those sports coaches that are the highest paid employees in their state coach at a program that loses money?

Here's the list of colleges ranked by the size of their endowments. We talk about athletics as a "marketing expense" and one that exists to keep alumni engaged: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colleges_and_univer... .

How many of those schools' highest paid employees are coaches? So, there's a model that works for schools perfectly well that doesn't involve making a coach your highest paid employee, right?
Isn't the number of programs that actually make a profit extremely low? Like less than 10%? Speaking from an Athletic Department as a whole, not individual programs. If that's the case, I would assume the answer to your question "How many of those sports coaches that are the highest paid employees in their state coach at a program that loses money?" is pretty high.

This list is old (2020), but it gives you a good idea.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/09/23/these-are... /

Here is your list of overall programs that actually make a profit. A very small number. One quote I found interesting:

"...37 of 229 public Division I athletics programs generated more money than they spent without considering FB coaches' salaries."

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/i-found-18-profitable-211-... -/

I don't have the time to cross reference, but the lists are pretty correlated.
Last Edited: 10/11/2023 1:33:13 PM by GoCats105
mail
person
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
10/11/2023 2:33 PM
GoCats105 wrote:expand_more
Isn't the number of programs that actually make a profit extremely low? Like less than 10%? Speaking from an Athletic Department as a whole, not individual programs. If that's the case, I would assume the answer to your question "How many of those sports coaches that are the highest paid employees in their state coach at a program that loses money?" is pretty high. [/QUOTE]Do you think that football and basketball coach salaries are determined by how the money they bring in is spent? Or by how much money they bring in?

If you ran a business, do you think you'd be able to hire good sales people if you told them that what they earned would depend on how you decided to spend the money they generated?



[QUOTE=GoCats105]
This list is old (2020), but it gives you a good idea.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/09/23/these-are... /
Just scrolling through the list, Arkansas football -- a mid-tier P5 team -- made $38.5m in profit in 2022. Illinois -- who sucks and has for a long time -- made roughly the same. Iowa State, in a lesser conference with a worse media deal, made ~$22m. Oregon State, in a league that just collapsed because of their terrible media deal, made ~$13m.

These schools are paying their coaches a fraction of the revenue their programs generate. In the USA Today article you shared, Arkansas is paying their coach $4m. That's just under 10% of their profit. It's 4.7% of their revenue.

Ohio pays Jeff Boals 25% of top-line revenue generated by the basketball team. That's a massive, massive difference.

So while I know you're not the one who said "this is what everybody does" because the highest paid public employee in most states is a coach, there's a huge difference in the programs that have their highest paid employee in the athletics department and ours.
Last Edited: 10/11/2023 2:35:07 PM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
person
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
10/11/2023 2:42 PM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
Even by the scale of our measly athletic budget, saving 250-300k on a major sport coaches salary is a drop in the bucket. what you're arguing is pointless when we get results that are well above what our budget indicates we should expect. [/QUOTE]This is true, for a few more years. But when the inevitable happens and college athletes end up considered employees, we're suddenly going to realize just how far that $300k in additional payroll goes.

[QUOTE=Deciduous Forest Cat]
we regularly punch above our weight class in football and basketball. I'd love to win more, sure, but we are competitive, graduate our kids and with of course some exceptions dotting our history, we recruit good citizens that represent the University well. Athletics are worth our investment, which is quite small.
I think this is true in basketball. We regularly punch above our weight class. But so do a lot of teams. It's literally the reason people like March Madness so much. We pay Boals 33% more than FAU's coach made before he took them to the Final Four. There's a lot of punching above weight classes in college basketball.

In football, I don't see how anybody can make the argument that we punch above our weight class. We haven't won our conference in forever. What better definition of weight class is there than our conference? We punch exactly at our weight class.
Last Edited: 10/11/2023 2:44:12 PM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
person
GoCats105
10/11/2023 4:21 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
Isn't the number of programs that actually make a profit extremely low? Like less than 10%? Speaking from an Athletic Department as a whole, not individual programs. If that's the case, I would assume the answer to your question "How many of those sports coaches that are the highest paid employees in their state coach at a program that loses money?" is pretty high.
Do you think that football and basketball coach salaries are determined by how the money they bring in is spent? Or by how much money they bring in?

If you ran a business, do you think you'd be able to hire good sales people if you told them that what they earned would depend on how you decided to spend the money they generated?



This list is old (2020), but it gives you a good idea.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2020/09/23/these-are... /
Just scrolling through the list, Arkansas football -- a mid-tier P5 team -- made $38.5m in profit in 2022. Illinois -- who sucks and has for a long time -- made roughly the same. Iowa State, in a lesser conference with a worse media deal, made ~$22m. Oregon State, in a league that just collapsed because of their terrible media deal, made ~$13m.

These schools are paying their coaches a fraction of the revenue their programs generate. In the USA Today article you shared, Arkansas is paying their coach $4m. That's just under 10% of their profit. It's 4.7% of their revenue.

Ohio pays Jeff Boals 25% of top-line revenue generated by the basketball team. That's a massive, massive difference.

So while I know you're not the one who said "this is what everybody does" because the highest paid public employee in most states is a coach, there's a huge difference in the programs that have their highest paid employee in the athletics department and ours.
I actually don't think it's determined by how much money you bring in at all. I think it's more a product of the market and "keeping up with Joneses" than anything. Now, determining whether or Ohio is overpaying or underpaying would be up to interpretation.

Also, I'm not sure you can break it down from the individual program perspective, considering a school like Arkansas will use football profits to fund other athletic programs that don't bring in revenue. What's Boals' salary percentage compared to Ohio's overall athletic budget? How does that compare to other schools?
mail
person
giacomo
10/11/2023 6:12 PM
Well, let’s say we buy the argument that because we have some good years and enrollments are up as a result. Wouldn’t those students who came to Ohio because of the basketball team also show up to the games? 4756 avg attendance would say “no”.
mail
person
BillyTheCat
10/12/2023 12:42 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
Many of you are seeing things that aren't there. If you owned a business and you had a department that either lost money or broke even, would that department head/manager be the highest paid in your company? We are a university and athletics are not our mission. They are an extra-curricular activity. Our president should be the highest paid person. I think many of you have dreams that if we just get the right coach and pay big money, that one day we will be the next Gonzaga. Then you can wear your Ohio gear to Hooters and strut your stuff.
When the highest paid state employee as well as university employee is a sports coach in all 50 states, why do you keep saying things like "we" referring to its just people on this board. We are doing what every other university is doing at our level and higher. So, every institution in the US that pays their coaches is doing it wrong? While Capital University is doing it right?
How many of those sports coaches that are the highest paid employees in their state coach at a program that loses money?

Here's the list of colleges ranked by the size of their endowments. We talk about athletics as a "marketing expense" and one that exists to keep alumni engaged: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_colleges_and_univer... .

How many of those schools' highest paid employees are coaches? So, there's a model that works for schools perfectly well that doesn't involve making a coach your highest paid employee, right?
Yes, is the answer, as most all programs in America lose money. But they provide value.
mail
person
BillyTheCat
10/12/2023 12:45 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
Many of you are seeing things that aren't there. If you owned a business and you had a department that either lost money or broke even, would that department head/manager be the highest paid in your company? We are a university and athletics are not our mission. They are an extra-curricular activity. Our president should be the highest paid person. I think many of you have dreams that if we just get the right coach and pay big money, that one day we will be the next Gonzaga. Then you can wear your Ohio gear to Hooters and strut your stuff.
One of my favorite stories to this argument is Florida Gulf Coast after its March Madness run.

https://eaglenews.org/1070/news/fgcu-admissions-spikes-ma... /

“The primary form of mass media advertising by academic institutions in the United States is, arguably, through their athletic programs,” said Harvard Business School Assistant Professor of marketing Doug J. Chung on HBS Working Knowledge website.

From March 21 to March 25, visits on the admissions page of the FGCU website jumped from 2,280 to 42,793, according to ESPN’s Kristi Dosh. The visits to the school website jumped from 47,067 to 230,985 and the athletics website visits jumped from 8,177 to 117,113, according to school records. This phenomenon is also known as the “Flutie Effect”.

The Flutie Effect is based on the 1984 Boston College-Miami football game when quarterback Doug Flutie threw a last second 48-yard “Hail Mary” pass to beat Miami 47-45.

In the following two years, according to Chung’s research, Boston College’s application rates shot up 30 percent. This has been an occurrence at multiple universities after a period of athletic success. According to ESPN, when Northern Iowa beat the top-seeded Kansas University Jayhawks in the 2010 NCAA Tournament, calls to the university admissions office spiked 30 percent. When Butler reached the national title game in 2010 NCAA Tournament, applications went up 41 percent.

So what has happened at FGCU? “At this time we would expect to see an increase in applications and we have,” said Marc Laviolette, the FGCU Director of Admissions. “However it is still early and taking a snapshot of where we are in applications compared to last year at this time is just one point in time and will not necessarily translate into a final percentage increase. We receive applications for next fall starting in September with the final deadline May 1st. At this point we are up in freshman applications by 27%.”

It's not about being the next Gonzaga (although that'd be awesome). Sports are a university's biggest revenue and exposure driver.
I agree with all of this.

But what I don't understand is why we pay Boals above market and how to quantify the ROI on that.

Everybody is talking about marketing spend as if companies don't quantify the ROI of marketing. They do. Sure, there are pieces of it (like branding) that are harder to quantify than others. But Boals makes quite a bit more than a lot of his peers, even those who coach in programs that generate more revenue, more eyeballs, and have more engagement among alumni.

There question here isn't "why do Universities spend so much money on sports." It's why does Ohio University spend more money on Jeff Boals than other schools spend on their basketball coaches.

The answer seems to be that we won games in March. Can we quantify the actual value that had on OU? We should be able to, right? FGCU did.
Above Market? What market? Our peer institutions? NCAA Mid Majors? Only the MAC?

Funny, half the people commenting here will be wanting coaching changes by mid-year. You spend half the year degrading a sport and our position in it, then the other half complaining about the results.
mail
person
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
10/12/2023 1:03 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Above Market? What market? Our peer institutions? NCAA Mid Majors? Only the MAC?
This is exactly my point, my dude. Folks came into this thread to lecture a completely imaginary person -- literally a strawman they made up -- about "market forces" and "revenue" and "supply" and I asked the exact question you just asked. The difference is that I actually took the time to compare Boals' salary to similar schools in terms of basketball revenue. So, you know, I took a stab at defining the market, as opposed to using the idea of "market forces" to talk down to an imaginary person.

Because everybody here is actually just using the idea of "market forces" as a way to say "we couldn't possibly know if Boals is overpaid." Which is the opposite of how markets work. The data is there, and we can look at it. This is a small, defined market, and the data exists in a way that we can slice it up however we like. We know revenue by school & sport, comp by school. We know leagues. This particular labor market is far, far easier to define than basically any other in the world.
Last Edited: 10/12/2023 1:27:00 PM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
mail
person
giacomo
10/12/2023 7:45 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
Above Market? What market? Our peer institutions? NCAA Mid Majors? Only the MAC?
This is exactly my point, my dude. Folks came into this thread to lecture a completely imaginary person -- literally a strawman they made up -- about "market forces" and "revenue" and "supply" and I asked the exact question you just asked. The difference is that I actually took the time to compare Boals' salary to similar schools in terms of basketball revenue. So, you know, I took a stab at defining the market, as opposed to using the idea of "market forces" to talk down to an imaginary person.

Because everybody here is actually just using the idea of "market forces" as a way to say "we couldn't possibly know if Boals is overpaid." Which is the opposite of how markets work. The data is there, and we can look at it. This is a small, defined market, and the data exists in a way that we can slice it up however we like. We know revenue by school & sport, comp by school. We know leagues. This particular labor market is far, far easier to define than basically any other in the world.
You’re making too much sense.
mail
person
Bobcat1996
10/12/2023 8:14 PM
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
For what the university is paying Coach Boals, wouldn't you want a little more for your buck?


No. He's literally out-performing his contract already. News flash coaches salaries aren't compared to art history professors. And art history professors salaries aren't compared to apple farmers. The talent pool for D1 basketball coaches is severely limited. There's large demand for high performing D1 basketball programs. Limited supply and high demand equals increased wages. And with how short-term and fickle tenures can be - and how they generally have to use their salaries to offset the wages of their staff, they're worth every penny.

Again, compare Boals performance in metrics that matter against his peers. He's worth the salary and then some.
That is your opinion. Boals is paid more than any professor or employee at Ohio University. I expect more for a coach who is by far the highest paid in the conference. I guess you only care about what happens in Cleveland in March. If that is the case, then why not schedule more power five teams and bring in some cash for the athletics program? I guess season ticket holders need not purchase tickets, because regular season games don't "count". Nobody cares what happens in the months of November, December, January and February.

And the next highest is Albin, is he overpaid too?
As for Coach Albin being overpaid compared to other university employees, like the president. Probably so. But Albin is probably the 5th highest paid coach in the league. Boals is the top paid coach in the MAC. Ohio University is paying Boals top dollar to be the best in the league. It shouldn't be based on only three games in March. Boals is paid for the entire body of work, not just for a few games. After his first four seasons, Boals was behind four other coaches in the MAC in conference wins. Since 2006, the Bobcats football team has a higher win percentage in conference regular season wins than the mens basketball team. However, since the regular season doens't count in basketball, many people don't care. I'm guessing basketball season ticket holders don't care either. Why pay all that money for season tickets, if games don't matter the first four months? Frank Solich didn't get second chances after ending up 9th, 8th or 4th seed in the conference standings. Albin has won .625 of his league games after two season. Boals won .585 after his four seasons. Yet Boals is paid considerably more. I'm not discounting what Boals team accomplished in Cleveland a few years ago, but that should not be the only consideration when paying him top dollar in the MAC. What did his teams do the other three years and how did they perform compared to his MAC peers during conference play? By paying Boals the highest salary in the MAC, Ohio expects to be the best in the conference. The last for seasons record in conference play do not indicate that the Bobcats are the top team in the league.
Last Edited: 10/12/2023 8:31:26 PM by Bobcat1996
mail
person
Bobcat1996
10/12/2023 8:47 PM
What is John Groce salary?

According to the report, Groce decided to keep his $650,000 salary in order to put more money into the program, such as hiring a dedicated strength coach and increasing the assistants’ compensation. A $75,000 retention bonus is available to him on July 31, 2025, and July 31, 2028.


Someone above suggested that Groce is paid more than Boals. According to this info, that is not true. The above info was published in January of 2023.
mail
OhioCatFan
10/13/2023 4:38 PM
I'm proud to be an alumnus of a school that can overpay their major sports head coaches. Go OHIO!
mail
person
giacomo
10/13/2023 6:14 PM
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
I'm proud to be an alumnus of a school that can overpay their major sports head coaches. Go OHIO!
I don’t think you’re kidding.
mail
OhioCatFan
10/13/2023 10:31 PM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
I'm proud to be an alumnus of a school that can overpay their major sports head coaches. Go OHIO!
I don’t think you’re kidding.
You might not be wrong.
mail
TWT
10/14/2023 9:00 AM
Schaus made a decision to become more nationally competitive with salaries after Groce left. Realized we should be paying 2x what the smaller schools pay in basketball and football. Its a mid major job not a low major job. 300k is low major/FCS money.
mail
person
BillyTheCat
10/14/2023 12:47 PM
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame wrote:expand_more
Above Market? What market? Our peer institutions? NCAA Mid Majors? Only the MAC?
This is exactly my point, my dude. Folks came into this thread to lecture a completely imaginary person -- literally a strawman they made up -- about "market forces" and "revenue" and "supply" and I asked the exact question you just asked. The difference is that I actually took the time to compare Boals' salary to similar schools in terms of basketball revenue. So, you know, I took a stab at defining the market, as opposed to using the idea of "market forces" to talk down to an imaginary person.

Because everybody here is actually just using the idea of "market forces" as a way to say "we couldn't possibly know if Boals is overpaid." Which is the opposite of how markets work. The data is there, and we can look at it. This is a small, defined market, and the data exists in a way that we can slice it up however we like. We know revenue by school & sport, comp by school. We know leagues. This particular labor market is far, far easier to define than basically any other in the world.
+1
mail
FearLeon
10/14/2023 8:12 PM
Anyone here questioning Boals salary might want to re-evaluate today what we are paying Timmy Albin.

Boals>Timmy
Last Edited: 10/14/2023 8:34:57 PM by FearLeon
Showing Messages: 51 - 75 of 102
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)