Have to credit Pete C. for finding this quote from Dambrot on posting to Twitter. From Elton Alexander's Plain Dealer article:
"When you're not happy after winning 26 and 27 games, you have to re-evaluate,'' Dambrot said when contacted late Monday night. "The one-bid league thing was really starting to wear on me and my staff."
http://www.cleveland.com/sports/college/index.ssf/2017/03...I saw that on twitter last night and couldn't take it seriously. It's just the kind of crap Dambrot says.
He can't win NCAA Tournament games anyway, so the one-bid league excuse is complete garbage.
I disagree. The one bid league thing has a lot of merit. Hopefully a wake up call for the MAC. Your best coach from your best program just left for a low level A10 job. He basically doubled his pay. And, if he comes in second or third in his conference, he may still make the NCAA tourney. And, his fans will be very happy with that 2nd or 3rd finish. Meanwhile, here in the MAC message boards want to fire guys who come in 2nd or 3rd.....
I don't think Akron is the best program.
In Dambrot's tenure at Akron:
Kent has more regular season championships.
Ohio has as many NCAA Tournament appearances as Akron (3 each)
Ohio has played in double the NCAA Tournament games as Akron (6 vs 3)
Akron's margin of loss in those 3 games was 13, 13 and 42. In Ohio's lone-1st round exit during Dambrot's tenure, we lost by 5.
Outside of Dambrot's tenure:
Akron ranks 10th of 12 MAC programs in NCAA Tournament appearances with 4 (Miami leads at 17 followed by Ohio with 13)
Akron is one of three MAC programs that has never won a NCAA Tournament game (along with NIU and Buffalo)
Ohio has a larger men's basketball budget. (quantifiable)
Ohio has a larger fanbase. (quantifiable)
Ohio has better facilities. (Convo vs JAR is not quantifiable)
Coaches are paid to win tournament games. There is a very clear correlation between coaching pay and NCAA Tournament success. Dambrot likes to whine. He thinks he deserves NCAA at-large bid, but gets blown out when he gets to the tournament. Blowout loses reflect terribly on the MAC. It's absurd to blame the conference when your team's performance on the national stage has only contributed to the stigma.
I actually disagree with those on this board who don't think Dambrot will have success at Duquesne. I don't think he has to up his recruiting that much to compete in the A-10, and with the institutional support I think he will easily be able to attract the kind of players he wants. Is Duquesne OK with paying a guy 1-million dollars to get an at-large bid and then lose by double-digits in the first round? If that's what they are going for, this is a home-run hire.