I can't see how this is a feasible solution in any way. Where does it stop? Is it high majors only paying players? How will struggling mid majors with thin budgets now afford to pay players? If basketball players get paid, what about other sports? What about women's hoops players? Where does it stop and how can you justify that stopping point?
This has been a hot topic out here on sports radio.
They've had a number of atty's give their opinion on it.
The are a number of issues that would have to be worked out to even consider it.
A few things that have come up:
1.Legally,especially with title IX,the consensus is that,to pay any player,in any sport,you'd have to include all D1 men's and women's sports.
2.Most people feel payment would be in addition to a scholarship.
Rosters have people on partial scholarship or no scholarship at all.
Would every athlete on your roster have to be paid ?
3.Paying an athlete makes him/her and employee.
So now you get into all kinds of issues with labor laws,unions,benefits etc.
4.There's no way this works unless it is applied to all D1 schools equally.
That would mean the "haves" ,or the NCAA, contributing to a pool for the "have nots".