Those expectations led most to be disappointed with the results the following season. That season that followed was a 14-2 conference mark and a share of the MAC regular season title. When was the last time that happened? And nobody cared.
That's because it's the MAC. Maybe if the MAC were a top 8ish conference that routinely got 2-3+ bids a season it might matter, but it isn't. I don't know how many times I have to repeat myself, but here goes again. The ONLY thing that matters is NCAA tournament appearances. Nobody cares about MAC regular season anythings beyond how it helps you in the MAC tournament to increase your chances of making the NCAA.
Going 14-2, 15-1, 18-0 or 0-18 in the MAC regular season....matters little. Make it to the dance = success. Don't make it to the dance = not a success.
Nothing about our Sweet 16 run influenced that opinion either. It was true before that as well.
Don't get me wrong. It's perfectly acceptable to ENJOY a season that doesn't end in "success" of making the tournament. But it also doesn't mean you have unrealistic expectations if you deem the season a disappointment or failure by the same scale.
Also, nobody EXPECTS success at a 100% rate. We're not Duke. We're not going to make the tourney this year (most likely). Doesn't mean we should fire SP. However - it does mean we should hold the coach and staff accountable for having successful seasons (making the NCAA tournament) with reasonable probability - say 1 in 3 years to 1 in 5/6 years. We can have a discussion about what that number should actually be based on historical results, current results, current expenditures, landscape of the conference etc etc.