Ohio Volleyball Topic
Topic: Horrible Loss
Page: 1 of 1
Panda
General User
P
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Post Count: 280
person
mail
Panda
mail
Posted: 11/23/2014 8:09 PM
I have watched this team for 20 years and this team looked like a team years ago. They lost their aggressiveness, they played not to lose and Western played extremely well after they were down 0-2. Very poor showing on a night that was very important.

Not sure what our gals were trying to do, but we gave WMU a lot of opportunities.

A good season that ends on a sour performance!!
Last Edited: 11/23/2014 8:37:44 PM by Panda
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 11/23/2014 8:14 PM
I'd beg to differ. Western dug the ball extremely well no matter what we threw at them. The key I feel was our lack of middle attack. We seemed to pass the ball to the middle rather than to the four slot and we had a traffic jam in there. I don't think the season is over, we just won't get a very favorable seed in the tourney.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 11/23/2014 8:18 PM
When you're up 2 sets to none and ahead in the 5th set and lose, that is not good. I know very little about volleyball, but this one hurt. I was amazed that we lost it.
Last Edited: 11/24/2014 8:53:50 AM by colobobcat66
MariettaCatFanatic
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 417
mail
MariettaCatFanatic
mail
Posted: 11/23/2014 8:28 PM
Rough loss but give credit to Western. They really dug in when we had them on the ropes several times and came up with some really big plays.
Panda
General User
P
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Post Count: 280
person
mail
Panda
mail
Posted: 11/23/2014 8:44 PM
I think that you will find that our kills went way down the last three games. Too many dinks(mash potatoes)that opened the door for WMU. We just lost too many points because we were way too soft.
Last Edited: 11/23/2014 8:45:38 PM by Panda
Radar
General User
R
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Portsmouth, OH
Post Count: 144
person
mail
Radar
mail
Posted: 11/23/2014 10:05 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
I'd beg to differ. Western dug the ball extremely well no matter what we threw at them. The key I feel was our lack of middle attack. We seemed to pass the ball to the middle rather than to the four slot and we had a traffic jam in there. I don't think the season is over, we just won't get a very favorable seed in the tourney.
Tend to agree with Swank.

My thoughts:

1. I think the double-bye hurt us. This was Western's third match of the Tournament, and our first. We were not in sync at all during the first set.

2. Western played GREAT defense all night long. We simply could not find the floor. On several occasions we blasted the ball over the net, and their dig came back across the net and caught us by surprise.

3. We simply could not get in system. As Swank points out, we couldn't get our passes to the right spot to be able to utilize all of our hitters. The middles were a non-factor. Too much pressure on our outsides forced quite a few hitting errors.

4. Plain and simple, Western outplayed us tonight. Props to them. They deserved it. Time to re-group, re-focus, and get back to work. We can still do some damage in the NCAA tournament.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 11/23/2014 10:30 PM
Radar wrote:expand_more
I'd beg to differ. Western dug the ball extremely well no matter what we threw at them. The key I feel was our lack of middle attack. We seemed to pass the ball to the middle rather than to the four slot and we had a traffic jam in there. I don't think the season is over, we just won't get a very favorable seed in the tourney.
Tend to agree with Swank.

My thoughts:

1. I think the double-bye hurt us. This was Western's third match of the Tournament, and our first. We were not in sync at all during the first set.

2. Western played GREAT defense all night long. We simply could not find the floor. On several occasions we blasted the ball over the net, and their dig came back across the net and caught us by surprise.

3. We simply could not get in system. As Swank points out, we couldn't get our passes to the right spot to be able to utilize all of our hitters. The middles were a non-factor. Too much pressure on our outsides forced quite a few hitting errors.

4. Plain and simple, Western outplayed us tonight. Props to them. They deserved it. Time to re-group, re-focus, and get back to work. We can still do some damage in the NCAA tournament.
Just saw the stats on the MAC website and one other thing sticks out - service errors - 13 for us and only 2 for them. You can't give away a net 11 points and win against a team like Western who has been one of the top 3 MAC squads over the past 30 years.
Radar
General User
R
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Portsmouth, OH
Post Count: 144
person
mail
Radar
mail
Posted: 11/23/2014 10:36 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
I'd beg to differ. Western dug the ball extremely well no matter what we threw at them. The key I feel was our lack of middle attack. We seemed to pass the ball to the middle rather than to the four slot and we had a traffic jam in there. I don't think the season is over, we just won't get a very favorable seed in the tourney.
Tend to agree with Swank.

My thoughts:

1. I think the double-bye hurt us. This was Western's third match of the Tournament, and our first. We were not in sync at all during the first set.

2. Western played GREAT defense all night long. We simply could not find the floor. On several occasions we blasted the ball over the net, and their dig came back across the net and caught us by surprise.

3. We simply could not get in system. As Swank points out, we couldn't get our passes to the right spot to be able to utilize all of our hitters. The middles were a non-factor. Too much pressure on our outsides forced quite a few hitting errors.

4. Plain and simple, Western outplayed us tonight. Props to them. They deserved it. Time to re-group, re-focus, and get back to work. We can still do some damage in the NCAA tournament.
Just saw the stats on the MAC website and one other thing sticks out - service errors - 13 for us and only 2 for them. You can't give away a net 11 points and win against a team like Western who has been one of the top 3 MAC squads over the past 30 years.
Agreed, but I'd give some credit to Western on that as well. They kept the pressure on, and we were never able to get in sync. They got into our heads. Way too many unforced errors tonight, both serving and hitting.
Jughead
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Location: Chillicothe, OH
Post Count: 478
mail
Jughead
mail
Posted: 11/23/2014 10:40 PM
Just got back from Athens. I'm disappointed with the loss as much as the next guy, but Western Michigan played outstanding with their backs against the wall.

We still have unfinished business against Dayton on Friday. However, this game is now a must win against the A-10's champion.
MariettaCatFanatic
General User
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 417
mail
MariettaCatFanatic
mail
Posted: 11/24/2014 8:12 AM
Jughead wrote:expand_more
Just got back from Athens. I'm disappointed with the loss as much as the next guy, but Western Michigan played outstanding with their backs against the wall.

We still have unfinished business against Dayton on Friday. However, this game is now a must win against the A-10's champion.
Important point here...if we want to have any shot at an at-large bid, we're going to have to go into Dayton and beat them.
stub
General User
S
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 1,008
person
mail
stub
mail
Posted: 11/24/2014 1:02 PM
MariettaCatFanatic wrote:expand_more
[QUOTE=Jughead]Just got back from Athens. I'm disappointed with the loss as much as the next guy, but Western Michigan played outstanding with their backs against the wall.


Important point here...if we want to have any shot at an at-large bid, we're going to have to go into Dayton and beat them.
Agree, beating Dayton is crucial for any chance. Another factor Ohio can't control is how the other tourney teams fare. If teams with no chance of a bid win their tourneys, providing their league with more entries into the NCAA, that reduces the pool for other bubble teams.
Last Edited: 11/24/2014 1:03:00 PM by stub
Scott Woods
General User
SW
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: On the banks of the Ohio, OH
Post Count: 243
person
mail
Scott Woods
mail
Posted: 11/25/2014 1:13 PM
I made the drive up for this game. It was my first Ohio volleyball game...maybe ever. My only question is related to the crowd. Was this a typical crowd in terms of size and sound?
oldkatz
General User
O
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Post Count: 1,461
person
mail
oldkatz
mail
Posted: 11/25/2014 2:13 PM
There were many more students than usual and the community attendance was somewhat larger than usual. As for sound and atmosphere, it was typical but not as orchestrated due to the nature of a MAC tournament.
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 11/25/2014 2:21 PM
oldkatz wrote:expand_more
There were many more students than usual and the community attendance was somewhat larger than usual. As for sound and atmosphere, it was typical but not as orchestrated due to the nature of a MAC tournament.
You mean that certain components of our usual atmosphere were muzzled? Attendance for a regular season match would have been reported at 3850. :)
Radar
General User
R
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Portsmouth, OH
Post Count: 144
person
mail
Radar
mail
Posted: 11/25/2014 4:13 PM
Alan Swank wrote:expand_more
There were many more students than usual and the community attendance was somewhat larger than usual. As for sound and atmosphere, it was typical but not as orchestrated due to the nature of a MAC tournament.
You mean that certain components of our usual atmosphere were muzzled? Attendance for a regular season match would have been reported at 3850. :)
Actually, it was oldkatz that was muzzled, and to a lesser extent the band...at the behest of the MAC...
Alan Swank
General User
AS
Member Since: 12/12/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 7,375
person
mail
Alan Swank
mail
Posted: 11/25/2014 6:08 PM
Radar wrote:expand_more
There were many more students than usual and the community attendance was somewhat larger than usual. As for sound and atmosphere, it was typical but not as orchestrated due to the nature of a MAC tournament.
You mean that certain components of our usual atmosphere were muzzled? Attendance for a regular season match would have been reported at 3850. :)
Actually, it was oldkatz that was muzzled, and to a lesser extent the band...at the behest of the MAC...
That's what I meant by certain components.
Monroe Slavin
General User
MS
Member Since: 12/21/2004
Location: Oxnard, CA
Post Count: 9,121
person
mail
Monroe Slavin
mail
Posted: 11/26/2014 10:14 AM
Let me correct a misperception: YOU CANNOT MUZZLE OLDKATZ. NFW.
Showing Messages: 1 - 17 of 17



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)