Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
4/12/2020 2:01 PM
By the way, for those that haven't read it, yesterday's New York Times deep dive into the Trump admin's handling of this outbreak should put too rest any notion that they've done "okay." It's deeply sourced, and illustrates how the admin pushed back against anybody internally that urged for severe steps, and made messaging their sole response.
The NSC had intelligence in early January and within weeks began floating suggestions about closing things down.
Peter Navarro, one of his trade advisors who was at the time leading the White House's Covid task force, published a memo on January 29th that Trump was briefed on that warned hundreds of thousands of deaths and economic calamity if steps weren't taken. Trump was upset Navarro had put that in writing.
Alex Azar warned him on 1/30. Trump told him he was being alarmist.
The top disaster response official at the Dept of Health and Human services began insisting on 2/21 that things would have to be shut down.
The task force was scheduled to present those findings to the President on 2/26, but when Nancy Messonnier, the Director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, have a press conference warning of the severity, and it led to a stock market crash, Trump called Azar and insisted his task force had unnecessarily scared people and Trump cancelled the meeting where his own task force was going to advocate to him a stance of social distancing. That night, Trump held a Press Conference where he gave control of the Task force to Pence, effectively firing Azar. An additional 3 weeks passed before Trump would publicly acknowledge the need for social distancing. This approach -- based on the agenda and data created for the meeting that never happened -- would eventually be implemented three weeks later.
For a full month, the Administration did nothing. No preparation for testing, no preparation for procuring necessary supplies. In fact, exports of supplies increased during that time. The risk was downplayed publicly as policy. All because of concerns over how the stock market would impact his re-election odds.
This was a failure of epic proportions. The fallout from this was going to be bad, regardless of who was in charge. But because the man in charge is a man who has actively eschewed expertise in favor of his own instinct, things turned out much, much worse.
The GOP shouldn't even renominate him, this failure has been so catastrophic. But instead they're going to do everything in their power between now and November to make it harder for people to vote, because they know lower turnout is the only way they win. Trump has already started railing against mail ballots, and the GOP is going to use Wisconsin as their playbook. They'll use anti-Demicratic means to ensure a failed President is reelected.
I fear the American experiment is reaching it's conclusion. If this pandemic is still active, or reemerges in November, the issue of voter eligibility will rear it's head in a way that I suspect will officially stamp out what was left of the appearance of Democracy in the US. One party will have decided that to maintain power, they need to legislate a means for a minority of Americans to determine who governs us, and they will do so on the back of blatantly false propaganda about voter fraud. What's left of America once you strip out democracy?
Anyhow, that's the end of my rant. Here's the link to the Times piece:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/11/us/politics/coronaviru... Dark times, I'm afraid.
Last Edited: 4/12/2020 2:02:45 PM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame