It's rather disheartening you take such an anti-democratic stance here. Colleges need students even more than students need college. Considering how little time trustees actually spend on campus and how much their finger is not on the pulse of students, it's vital students have a meaningful role in how policy is shaped. Should they constitute the majority of power? Probably not, but to not even give them a seat at the table only weakens the university.
There's plenty of people who can keep the trustees informed and up to date, including students themselves. You don't need to be on the board to do that. Also, this idea that trustees are clueless is strange to me. These people take their positions very seriously. And, give up a lot of their time serving the university. And, its a thankless job. I bet Bob Walter never knew how dumb he was until he was appointed to the Board at Ohio University.
The great people of the state of Ohio have decided (rather democratically I might add) that the Governor appoints Board Members and Board Members hire presidents and presidents and Board Members hire executives and those folks run universities. Like I said previously, this is still working rather well at many universities in Ohio.
Not implementing
your or my specific ideas doesn't meant they are dumb and out of touch. I don't agree with everything the university does. But, this place and several others in Ohio seem to be doing quite well.
Will the cost involved eventually destroy the traditional college industry? Maybe. Maybe not. Right now consumers are still lining up. And requesting a country-club type experience that drives costs up as well. I hope it survives in its current state. Kids sitting in their parents basements getting lectured to by a talking head on a computer doesn't seem like a winning formula to me. But, that's just my crazy opinion.
Last Edited: 8/11/2014 8:53:23 AM by Ohio69