As I recall,in addition to bats,the first reports about the President's residence also mentioned other issues with the house,including "structurial problems".
I guess those issues weren't "sexy" enough,so all anyone seems to be talking about are the bats.
The issue of "structural problems" was finally mentioned in Dina Berliner's article in today's (3/26) The Post.
I'm an engineer who has inspected hundreds of houses.I've also provided expert testimony in court cases which involved houses and industrial buildings with structural issues.
The fact that bats got into the house,apparently more then once,is a concern.
"Structural problems" add a whole differnet dynamic to the situation.
Depending on the nature and severity of the problems,you could be looking at extensive repairs,including partial reconstruction of the structure.
In many cases,I've found that it is not cost effective to repair the structure.
It may be that the path that O.U. is taking is the most prudent approach to this situation.
I don't know,but unlike a lot of people (83 faculty members and the vice president of the student senate come to mind),I don't pretend to.
Last Edited: 3/26/2015 8:10:16 AM by rpbobcat