The article that Allen posted was one of the things I researched today.
When I read it a few things stood out:
1.The site, which is not exactly unbiased, points out that there were contradictory reports of what happened.
2.There doesn't seem to any question that the police were dealing with a violent situation.
3.I don't know about Mississippi, but where I live in New Jersey, in 1970, police departments were still primarily using revolvers. Spent shells stayed in the weapon. When you reloaded, if "policing your brass" was a concern, you could just put the spent shells in a pocket.
4.Assuming at least some officers had automatic weapons, how do you find hundreds of spent shells, in the dark, with all kinds of debris around, in just a few minutes.
This is based on the fact that the article says the wounded were taken to hospitals within 20 minutes if the shootings.
5.Based on the web site's description of what happened and the fact that there was a Federal investigation, including the F.B.I. and Senate, why weren't there any charges in Federal Court for Violating Civil Rights ?
As I said before, there's no doubt that the police overreacted.
But I do think its unfair, based on the description of the events, to not put any responsibility for what happened on people who were rioting.
Last Edited: 5/6/2016 6:57:51 AM by rpbobcat