Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
6/12/2024 6:40 PM
I agree with you, but then go to the sports forums and folks think we can afford to pay 500 employees
Bet you can't quote somebody saying that.
That would be the numerous folks on this board and many others saying that the athletes should be paid. I don't think we was talking about traditional employees within the department.
I know what he was talking about. Who can you quote saying players should be employees?
The only conversation where it really came up was between me, you, and BTC -- and I wasn't actually advocating for employment, just pointing out that if you want to solve for player movement and stop people from transferring because they're misinformed of their NIL value, one potential solution is creating a more transparent, labor market.
But the actual conversation that BTC and I have had about that -- at length -- is that I suspected we'd end up with some hybrid where the players aren't employees but get a revenue share, or if they are employees, it'll be as a special class created for college athletics where all of the concerns about employment that BTC insists will bankrupt college sports will be carved out.
Which is just to say that BTC is just creating a strawman and arguing with nobody, as usual. And while he's doing so, the NCAA/P5 proposal is actually shaping up to be quite similar to what\ I outlined it'd be.
Last Edited: 6/12/2024 6:57:40 PM by Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame