General Ohio University Discussion/Alumni Events Topic
Topic: We are number 489
Page: 1 of 1
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,759
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 9/28/2017 4:46 PM
In yesterday's Wall Street Journal they listed the top 500 colleges in the United States. We were ranked 489. Buffalo was around 120, Miami was around 312 and Toledo was above us around 400. No other Mac schools were listed and Marshall was absent from the list.
OUBobcat13
General User
OUB13
Member Since: 12/8/2005
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Post Count: 285
person
mail
OUBobcat13
mail
Posted: 9/28/2017 4:51 PM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
In yesterday's Wall Street Journal they listed the top 500 colleges in the United States. We were ranked 489. Buffalo was around 120, Miami was around 312 and Toledo was above us around 400. No other Mac schools were listed and Marshall was absent from the list.
That doesn't seem like much to brag about...
RPO R6V
General User
RR
Member Since: 1/7/2005
Post Count: 206
person
mail
RPO R6V
mail
Posted: 9/28/2017 9:21 PM
But... McDavis!
mf279801
General User
M279801
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Newark, DE
Post Count: 2,486
person
mail
mf279801
mail
Posted: 9/28/2017 11:29 PM
OUBobcat13 wrote:expand_more
In yesterday's Wall Street Journal they listed the top 500 colleges in the United States. We were ranked 489. Buffalo was around 120, Miami was around 312 and Toledo was above us around 400. No other Mac schools were listed and Marshall was absent from the list.
That doesn't seem like much to brag about...
Wait? Was that bragging? I took it as alarm bells.

Definitely not a great place to be*.



*Stated without having looked up what criteria they're using to rank these schools
Taiwan BC
General User
TB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Kaohsiung
Post Count: 525
person
mail
Taiwan BC
mail
Posted: 9/29/2017 1:54 AM
http://www.daytondailynews.com/news/area-colleges-ranked-... /

Engagement? That's a real concrete, measurable metric... Frickin' Cedarville?
OUVan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Bethesda, MD
Post Count: 5,580
mail
OUVan
mail
Posted: 9/29/2017 10:12 AM
My arbitrary criteria had us much higher.
Ohio69
General User
O69
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 3,123
person
mail
Ohio69
mail
Posted: 9/29/2017 10:57 AM
My message to the WSJ: Not even close bud.
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,668
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 9/29/2017 11:02 AM
This has as much validity as the infamous Princeton Party School rankings.
giacomo
General User
G
Member Since: 11/20/2007
Post Count: 2,759
person
mail
giacomo
mail
Posted: 9/29/2017 5:55 PM
https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-the-wsj-the-college-ran...

This article tells you how they ranked the schools.
TWT
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,445
mail
TWT
mail
Posted: 10/1/2017 10:44 AM
giacomo wrote:expand_more
https://www.wsj.com/articles/what-the-wsj-the-college-ran...

This article tells you how they ranked the schools.
If its graduates financial success that is measured Buffalo is going to have a big advantage with many of its grads from the metropolitan NYC area where wages and opportunities are greater. Toledo has a relatively high percentage of graduates in professional programs. The study is basically saying don't go for liberal arts in rural college towns but go for professional programs in major metro areas.
OUPride
General User
OUP
Member Since: 9/21/2010
Post Count: 578
person
mail
OUPride
mail
Posted: 10/1/2017 11:39 AM
Case, Kenyon and Cincinnati unranked. That negates any credibility right there.
Showing Messages: 1 - 11 of 11
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)