I really like the backgrounds of the first two candidates in particular.
And no offense to her and her commitment to OHIO over recent years, but if Dr. Benoit is selected as our next President, I am pulling 100% of my financial commitments to the University.
Why is that? Is it that you feel she isn't as qualified as the other candidates? Or is it something else?
In the interest of brevity: the University needs a "CEO" in the President's role, and she has not held a position in that role in the past. I do not believe she is qualified to run the "business" of the business that is the University. The other three candidates have that experience. I could give you 100,000 words on the topic, though.
Neither did McDavis. Do you consider him a success? If so, you just refuted your own argument.
Is it still 2004? And did the last 13 years not happen? You just gave evidence to why I hardly post any longer, and perhaps should just stop.
Without more, I find D.A.'s take rather uncharitable, to say the least.
D.A.--Have you spoken with Dr. Benoit or met her?
I wouldn't judge a finalist merely on their resume/C.V. I'd at least want to know more, to meet them or hear directly from them (the purpose of the Forum, I assume).
And, like it or not, your post comes off as quite the slam: pledging withdrawal of support if she's hired.
If she's your least favorite candidate, that's fine.
To say that you'll withdraw your support, is pretty much offensive.
Just because a person hasn't been a CEO, without more, strikes me as not such a good reason for saying that the person cannot be a fine CEO. Everyone who became a CEO once was not one.
If she's had success along the trail in academia, she may be able as President.