Several years ago Harvard and now all Ivy League schools stopped awarding scholarships on the basis of academic performance. All of their scholarships are now on the basis of need, as they define it. I thought it was a big mistake then, and still think so. It might make sense for a very talented kid with high SAT scores, from a middle class background, to take a full-ride academic scholarship from a state school rather than be saddled with maybe a half-tuition scholarship at an Ivy League school. A kid from a very low socio-economic family with the same credentials would probably be wiser to go to the Ivy League school.
This is where you fail....Harvard and Yale do not give merit scholarships, in fact their financial aid is totally based on economics. Yet their ACT/SAT/Merit Scholarships have NOT suffered. The average cost to attend Harvard is $6K and Yale $12K roughly. If you are under $120K in family income it's free at both. In fact when you go through the admission process they tell you that getting into those schools is the hardest part of graduating. My child attends a $64k institution with no merit aid at a far cheaper rate than OHIO university offered, and that is with a 36 ACT and 3600 ACT while being a National Merit Scholar at $10k over 4 years. less than $65k a year is free, $65k to $150k is 0%-10% of sticker price and that is with ZERO loans figured in. That is a hell of a deal for the education.
Bottom line is every school offers a unique opportunity and experience for each person. If it was as cut and dried as some think, we'd only need 1 school in each state.
So you clearly are out of touch while you are waiting for your shuttle to the Frisco Bowl.
Last Edited: 12/6/2018 9:42:33 PM by BillyTheCat