I dunno LC...most of the other MAC schools have close to 20 guys as verbals. ...
Rivals has rated an average of 8.3 players for each MAC school.
EMU 3
Akron, Ohio 4
Buffalo 6
Kent, WMU, U. Mass 7
NIU, Miami 9
CMU 10
BG, Ball State, Toledo 14
ESPN has rated 6.9 players per team aveage:
Ohio 2
Buffalo, WMU 3
EMU, Akron 5
Kent 6
Miami 7
Ball State, NIU 8
BG 9
Toledo 10
U.Mass 11
CMU 13
With Scout you can't really tell who they have rated and who they haven't since almost everyone gets 2 stars.
247 sports has a lot more of the players rated at 12.6 a team
Akron, Buffalo 6
U.Mass 8
Kent 9
Ohio, WMU 10
EMU 11
NIU 14
BG, Toledo 16
CMU, Ball State 19
Miami 20
I would guess that most teams have 20 or so recruits, yet most of the services have only rated about 1/3 of them. I am skeptical of the value of a team rating when that few individual players have been evaluated. For example, how can a team rating for Ohio make any sense when they have only looked at 2 of the players Ohio has recruited?
Edit - and yes, Casper, the 2010 class was not as good as most classes, and yes, it is hurting depth. In fact, it probably hurt this year as those players were Sophomores, and since depth was definitely needed. There were only 12 Freshmen in that class, and of those, 3 are gone, Snyder, Tarrrant, and Stefanski. The remaining nine include some that are solid players, and others likely to remain backups, but no gamebreakers.
Last Edited: 1/17/2013 10:49:12 PM by L.C.