Ohio Football Recruiting Topic
Topic: 2014 RB Josh Boyd (Norcross, GA) -Ohio Offer
Page: 1 of 1
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/21/2013 5:18 PM
Wouldn't this guy be a great addition to the 2014 Class? It's already an awesome class, but really needs another RB. I noticed that per his 247Sports page, he seems to have narrowed his choice to Ohio, Washington State, and Syracuse. Here's some film of him as a Junior. Ohio has been getting a lot of good recruits out of Georgia lately, and I hope they can add Josh to the list.
LoganElm_grad09
General User
LE09
Member Since: 9/9/2010
Location: South Bloomingville, OH
Post Count: 934
person
mail
LoganElm_grad09
mail
Posted: 10/21/2013 7:11 PM
I have no idea what the caliber of the defenses he is playing are, but that kid has great balance.  He's pretty fast, too.

Let's get this guy!
crackerbaby00
General User
C00
Member Since: 3/9/2007
Post Count: 442
person
mail
crackerbaby00
mail
Posted: 10/21/2013 8:06 PM
2 Stars on Rivals

3 Stars on ESPN

If the above rumor is correct, it is nice to know that we have already beaten out NIU, Toledo, UAB, and UNLV.  Lets get this one wrapped up!
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 10/21/2013 8:20 PM
Either everyone else on the field is huge, or he hit a growth spurt between junior and senior year. I would not guess he is 5-10 from that video.

I think we need a JUCO RB next year. We're losing 2 to graduation. Figure we lose another to injury for at least some time. I'm not sure true freshmen will be ready to fill the void. 

That being said, Mr. Boyd, Ohio will welcome you with open arms!
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/21/2013 9:06 PM
The Ghost of C Money wrote:expand_more
...I think we need a JUCO RB next year. We're losing 2 to graduation. Figure we lose another to injury for at least some time. I'm not sure true freshmen will be ready to fill the void...

You mean like Voncarie Owens, or Dallas Brown?

I don't have strong opposition to the idea of bringing in a JUCO RB, but I'm not really opposed to going with young guys and letting them learn on the job, either. If they get Boyd and Walker, the lineup next year would include Edmond as a Senior when you need a big back, and Patterson (Jr), Dorian Brown (R-Fr), Walker (true Fr), and Boyd (true Fr). I think they can get the job done.
Last Edited: 10/21/2013 11:49:57 PM by L.C.
Mike Johnson
General User
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: North Canton, OH
Post Count: 1,756
mail
Mike Johnson
mail
Posted: 10/21/2013 10:18 PM
Ohio?
Washington State?
Syracuse?

Go to Washington State and Josh Boyd gets to play in the Pac 12.   And likely see lots of losing.  Ever been to Pullman?  I have. Talk about isolated.  Heck it's closer to Idaho than the Pacific Coast.

Go to Syracuse - and get frostbite walking to class.  I speak from the experience of living in Upstate New York's snowbelt - in Schenectady where on one memorable Christmas Eve/Day 48" of white fell.  What did the city do with all that snow?  Dumped it in the Mohawk River.

Go to Ohio and likely experience significant winning.  Inhabit one of the 5 prettiest campuses I've ever walked, and I've walked at least 100 from Harvard, Georgetown, Virginia and William & Mary in the East to Oregon State, Oregon, Stanford and UCLA in the West. Earn a degree that will cause many doors to swing open.
GoCats105
General User
GC105
Member Since: 1/31/2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Post Count: 7,811
person
mail
GoCats105
mail
Posted: 10/22/2013 12:22 PM
Get this guy, put him in the #5 jersey just like GA native Kalvin McRae, then just sit back and watch.
Columbus_Bobcat
General User
CB
Member Since: 11/23/2012
Post Count: 413
person
mail
Columbus_Bobcat
mail
Posted: 10/22/2013 10:28 PM
Mike Johnson wrote:expand_more
Ohio?
Washington State?
Syracuse?

Go to Washington State and Josh Boyd gets to play in the Pac 12.   And likely see lots of losing.  Ever been to Pullman?  I have. Talk about isolated.  Heck it's closer to Idaho than the Pacific Coast.

Go to Syracuse - and get frostbite walking to class.  I speak from the experience of living in Upstate New York's snowbelt - in Schenectady where on one memorable Christmas Eve/Day 48" of white fell.  What did the city do with all that snow?  Dumped it in the Mohawk River.

Go to Ohio and likely experience significant winning.  Inhabit one of the 5 prettiest campuses I've ever walked, and I've walked at least 100 from Harvard, Georgetown, Virginia and William & Mary in the East to Oregon State, Oregon, Stanford and UCLA in the West. Earn a degree that will cause many doors to swing open.


I agree with this 100 percent.

 
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/28/2013 4:18 PM
Hmm, Syracuse drops to "cool", and now the three that are "warm" are Ohio, Washington State, and Appalachian State. I agree with other posters - the choice is easy - Ohio, for all the reasons above, plus two more.

The first reason is coaching stability. I know nothing at all about the situation at Washington State or at App State, but I know that most schools these days seem to change coaches every 4 years or so. I do know that the Ohio coaching situation is unusually stable. Ohio is has an unusual combination - they are winning, and Solich is old enough that other schools are not interested in him. Solich might retire, but he's healthy, and is clearly having fun, so I think he will coach another five years or so. Even when he does retire, the odds strongly favor one of his assistants getting the job, in which case there won't be any major changes to the staff.

The second reason is that, under Solich, who used to be a running backs coach, Ohio has always run the ball well, and will continue to run the ball well in the future, and they will also win, and continue to win in the future. Because of injuries to the bulk of the mostly Senior starting offensive line, Ohio played much of this year with an offensive line made up of Freshmen and Sophomores, and while they did not dominate to the extent of Ohio's offensive lines of the past few years, they certainly held their own. That's not bad at all for a very young offensive line, most of whom had never played at all for Ohio before this year, much less started. With many more years ahead of them, they will only get better and better, and the next few years are promising indeed. Some running backs are going to be racking up yards over the next few years for Ohio.

The ten freshmen/Sophomore offensive linemen that have played this year are:
Mike McQueen 6-6, 300 R-Soph = LT/LG
Justin Haser 6-6 285 R-Soph = LG
Mike Lucas 6-4, 311 R-Soph = LG/C/RG
Seth Everhart 6-4 311 R-Soph = LG/RG
Lucas Powell 6-3, 295 R-Soph = C
Durrell Wood 6-2, 285 True Freshman = RG
Nic Gibbons 6-5, 308 R-Fr = RG
Troy Watson 6-6, 290 R-Fr = RT
Michael Curtis 6-5 295 R-So = RT
Jacob Welter 6-4, 295 R-So = OG

I see that the leading rusher for Washington State has only 47 carries for 208 yards, and the number 2 guy has 33 carries for 169 yards. Because of the offensive line issues, Ohio is having an off year for rushers, and the leading rusher for Ohio has only 118 carries for 515 yards, while the backup has 94 for 364 yards. Even # 3 has 24 carries for 146 yards, and would have more if he hadn't hurt is ankle. Blankenship will probably get 1000 yards this year, but is very unlikely to match the 1604 yards he had last year.

When I looked at Appalachian State, I was surprised by how far they have fallen this year. Only what seems like a couple years ago, they beat Michigan, and now they are only 2-6? It sure has made a difference since Jerry Moore retired, I guess. Nevertheless, they still do seem to know how to run the ball. Their leading rusher, Cox, has 132 carries for 699 yards, while the backup has 49 carries for 153 yards. Thus, for a running back, Appalachian State might be more promising than Washington State.

Top 2 rushers combined, by school:
Ohio  212 Carries, 879 yards
App St 181 Carries, 852 yards
Wash St 80 Carries, 377 yards
Last Edited: 10/28/2013 5:23:09 PM by L.C.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/29/2013 9:14 PM
OUOhYeah2428
General User
OUOY2428
Member Since: 2/20/2013
Location: VA
Post Count: 106
person
mail
OUOhYeah2428
mail
Posted: 10/29/2013 10:11 PM
lower-tier FBS teams...ok
cbarber357
General User
C357
Member Since: 9/10/2012
Location: Pickerington, OH
Post Count: 1,152
person
mail
cbarber357
mail
Posted: 10/29/2013 10:29 PM
OUOhYeah2428 wrote:expand_more
lower-tier FBS teams...ok

Lol. Syracuse is calling other teams lower tier FBS? We've had way more success, NIU would violate them, and they're not even the best team in the state of New York right now (I'd give it to Buffalo). That's kind of funny and also sad that they think that at the same time.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 10/30/2013 8:40 PM
By the way, the answer to their question "why doesn't he have lots of long runs" is that long runs are the sign of good blocking more than a sign of a good running back. When I see a lot of long runs, it doesn't tell me anything about the back because usually the back is taking a hand-off and running through a big hole. If you watch the film of Boyd again, you'll note that on most of his handoffs there are defensive linemen in the backfield. His offensive line is getting no push, and that means he has to usually make a sideways move early. You'll also note that most of the wide receivers on his team are just watching, and only a few actually try to throw a downfield block.

Considering the blocking he is getting, he is doing an amazing job. Give him Ohio's offensive line in front of him, and Ohio's receivers blocking downfield and he'll have plenty of long runs.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 11/27/2013 10:22 AM
Verbal to Ap State.
Showing Messages: 1 - 14 of 14
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)