Ohio Football Recruiting Topic
Topic: Question about this class
Page: 1 of 1
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,664
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 12/20/2017 10:22 PM
I don't follow recruiting nearly as closely as some of you, but in looking over this class it appears to me that it is significantly taller than any class I can remember. Is this impression correct?
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 12/21/2017 9:12 AM
I think you are right, especially in the secondary. We now have a 6-2 corner and a 6-3 safety to contest those jump balls.
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 12/21/2017 12:22 PM
C Money wrote:expand_more
I think you are right, especially in the secondary. We now have a 6-2 corner and a 6-3 safety to contest those jump balls.
And a 6’4” WR for the Red Zone.

We might have landed the Penn QB because of his lack of height....never stopped Fran Tarkenton or Doug Flutie.
Last Edited: 12/21/2017 12:24:30 PM by Doc Bobcat
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 12/21/2017 12:58 PM
Doc Bobcat wrote:expand_more
I think you are right, especially in the secondary. We now have a 6-2 corner and a 6-3 safety to contest those jump balls.
And a 6’4” WR for the Red Zone.

We might have landed the Penn QB because of his lack of height....never stopped Fran Tarkenton or Doug Flutie.
The wide receiver is a little bit slow, he may end up being a tight end. The db's are taller and both run in the 4.5 range. Collier looks like he has good football speed.
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 12/21/2017 3:29 PM
The weight factor is also important. We have a few 330 pound lineman this year. I’m not saying every 330 pound lineman will work out...actually the 300 pound Ramer looks like a beast...but I remember the days when we would recruit a 6’6”-240 tackle hoping he’d fill in...didn’t work out much.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 12/21/2017 4:13 PM
Doc Bobcat wrote:expand_more
The weight factor is also important. We have a few 330 pound lineman this year. I’m not saying every 330 pound lineman will work out...actually the 300 pound Ramer looks like a beast...but I remember the days when we would recruit a 6’6”-240 tackle hoping he’d fill in...didn’t work out much.
THe Grobe days haha, I remember we had a 250 pound tackle that was pretty good.
Bobcat-7.0
General User
B70
Member Since: 12/19/2013
Post Count: 160
person
mail
Bobcat-7.0
mail
Posted: 12/21/2017 6:29 PM
allen wrote:expand_more
I think you are right, especially in the secondary. We now have a 6-2 corner and a 6-3 safety to contest those jump balls.
And a 6’4” WR for the Red Zone.

We might have landed the Penn QB because of his lack of height....never stopped Fran Tarkenton or Doug Flutie.
The wide receiver is a little bit slow, he may end up being a tight end. The db's are taller and both run in the 4.5 range. Collier looks like he has good football speed.
I read this post before I saw who wrote it - but knew it was Allen.
Showing Messages: 1 - 7 of 7



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)