Ohio Football Recruiting Topic
Topic: 2018 OL Patrick Gilliland (Columbus Bishop Hartley HS, OH) - Ohio Commit
Page: 1 of 2
Ted Thompson
Administrator
Member Since: 11/11/2004
Location: MAC Play
Post Count: 7,943
mail
Ted Thompson
mail
Posted: 6/26/2017 3:40 PM

 

stallionfan8989
General User
S8989
Member Since: 6/26/2017
Post Count: 1
person
mail
stallionfan8989
mail
Posted: 6/26/2017 4:53 PM
Wow, this is a questionable choice for my beloved Bobcat's. I have watched this player since he was in pee wee football and always tends to be disappointing given his size. Do not know how this player was evaluated as he was not a starter for his Jr. season, due to smaller players eating his lunch routinely. Guess size matters on this pick but fear OU is in for a rude awakening here, especially since Central Ohio has much better players at this position to be had. Best guess is a project player at best.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 6/26/2017 6:38 PM
stallionfan8989 wrote:expand_more
Wow, this is a questionable choice for my beloved Bobcat's. I have watched this player since he was in pee wee football and always tends to be disappointing given his size. Do not know how this player was evaluated as he was not a starter for his Jr. season, due to smaller players eating his lunch routinely. Guess size matters on this pick but fear OU is in for a rude awakening here, especially since Central Ohio has much better players at this position to be had. Best guess is a project player at best.
Well, one Bobcat coach said "big upside" in his tweet so you may be right. I'd guess they saw something or wouldn't have offered.

Anyway, welcome aboard. I'll watch this guy with special interest after your evaluation.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 6/26/2017 7:15 PM
stallionfan8989 wrote:expand_more
Wow, this is a questionable choice for my beloved Bobcat's. I have watched this player since he was in pee wee football and always tends to be disappointing given his size. Do not know how this player was evaluated as he was not a starter for his Jr. season, due to smaller players eating his lunch routinely. Guess size matters on this pick but fear OU is in for a rude awakening here, especially since Central Ohio has much better players at this position to be had. Best guess is a project player at best.
We may be just trying to get numbers because somebody probably mentioned that other schools have 12-15 commits. Scholarships are gold and we should act like it. If this kid did not start his junior, why are we offering? Will we take eight easy wins to catch up?
BuddyLee
General User
BL
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 686
person
mail
BuddyLee
mail
Posted: 6/26/2017 7:23 PM
It's very concerning based on stallion's breakdown. I'm guessing there isn't any information at all from the recruiting services or high school film available if he didn't start as a junior.
Last Edited: 6/26/2017 7:27:13 PM by BuddyLee
C Money
General User
Member Since: 8/28/2010
Post Count: 3,420
mail
C Money
mail
Posted: 6/26/2017 8:22 PM
Some video is embedded in this profile:
http://scoutingohio.com/index.php?option=com_community&vi...

Most of the video shows him on the DL, and a decent space eater, too.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 6/26/2017 8:39 PM
stallionfan8989 wrote:expand_more
Wow, this is a questionable choice for my beloved Bobcat's. I have watched this player since he was in pee wee football and always tends to be disappointing given his size. Do not know how this player was evaluated as he was not a starter for his Jr. season, due to smaller players eating his lunch routinely. Guess size matters on this pick but fear OU is in for a rude awakening here, especially since Central Ohio has much better players at this position to be had. Best guess is a project player at best.

We don't often get posts like this, regarding new commits. The last one like this I remember was regarding Eric Herman. Sadly, that was before the BA data loss, or I'd link to it. It nearly directly mirrored your post, though. We'll come back to this post in a few years and see if you were prescient, or not.
Last Edited: 6/26/2017 8:40:47 PM by L.C.
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 6/26/2017 9:52 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Wow, this is a questionable choice for my beloved Bobcat's. I have watched this player since he was in pee wee football and always tends to be disappointing given his size. Do not know how this player was evaluated as he was not a starter for his Jr. season, due to smaller players eating his lunch routinely. Guess size matters on this pick but fear OU is in for a rude awakening here, especially since Central Ohio has much better players at this position to be had. Best guess is a project player at best.

We don't often get posts like this, regarding new commits. The last one like this I remember was regarding Eric Herman. Sadly, that was before the BA data loss, or I'd link to it. It nearly directly mirrored your post, though. We'll come back to this post in a few years and see if you were prescient, or not.
Not sure how "big" he is. An old roster says 275. A newer one just says he's 6'6". I imagine he's close to 300 after watching the limited vids. Recruiting times have changed. I used to complain about 225 pound OLs.

One saving grace is that he's part of a great program at Bishop Hartley.
Jeff McKinney
Moderator
JM
Member Since: 11/12/2004
Post Count: 6,163
person
mail
Jeff McKinney
mail
Posted: 6/26/2017 10:45 PM
allen wrote:expand_more
Wow, this is a questionable choice for my beloved Bobcat's. I have watched this player since he was in pee wee football and always tends to be disappointing given his size. Do not know how this player was evaluated as he was not a starter for his Jr. season, due to smaller players eating his lunch routinely. Guess size matters on this pick but fear OU is in for a rude awakening here, especially since Central Ohio has much better players at this position to be had. Best guess is a project player at best.
We may be just trying to get numbers because somebody probably mentioned that other schools have 12-15 commits. Scholarships are gold and we should act like it. If this kid did not start his junior, why are we offering? Will we take eight easy wins to catch up?
There's no way a Division I staff would just offer someone just to try to catch up in numbers to other schools. They have to see something worthy in this player.

Stallion? Must be a DeSales fan, no?
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 6/26/2017 11:45 PM
Jeff McKinney wrote:expand_more
Wow, this is a questionable choice for my beloved Bobcat's. I have watched this player since he was in pee wee football and always tends to be disappointing given his size. Do not know how this player was evaluated as he was not a starter for his Jr. season, due to smaller players eating his lunch routinely. Guess size matters on this pick but fear OU is in for a rude awakening here, especially since Central Ohio has much better players at this position to be had. Best guess is a project player at best.
We may be just trying to get numbers because somebody probably mentioned that other schools have 12-15 commits. Scholarships are gold and we should act like it. If this kid did not start his junior, why are we offering? Will we take eight easy wins to catch up?
There's no way a Division I staff would just offer someone just to try to catch up in numbers to other schools. They have to see something worthy in this player.

Stallion? Must be a DeSales fan, no?
Perhaps the youngster camped this summer and dominated.
Sam bobcat
General User
SB
Member Since: 7/14/2015
Post Count: 633
person
mail
Sam bobcat
mail
Posted: 6/26/2017 11:59 PM
stallionfan8989 wrote:expand_more
Wow, this is a questionable choice for my beloved Bobcat's. I have watched this player since he was in pee wee football and always tends to be disappointing given his size. Do not know how this player was evaluated as he was not a starter for his Jr. season, due to smaller players eating his lunch routinely. Guess size matters on this pick but fear OU is in for a rude awakening here, especially since Central Ohio has much better players at this position to be had. Best guess is a project player at best.
Trotter and Fernandez from last years OL class seem to be busts too from what I've heard.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 6/27/2017 12:32 AM
O-line recruiting always seems to be more of a mystery than any other position. Perhaps it's because players almost never come in ready to play, and usually must mature for 3 years or so before they are ready. Injuries are a factor as well. In the final analysis, sometimes you get little known players who come in and play well, and sometimes you get guys that dominate in high school that come in and don't improve. That's one reason I always like to see a strong walkon program at offensive line, though it hasn't worked out that well at Ohio. A few guys have come is an walkons and done well, but not many.

When you hire a new OL coach, he gets a pass for a few years while he recruits and trains his own guys. Johnson has been at Ohio for a few years now. We'll see what sort of product he can put on the field this fall.
Last Edited: 6/27/2017 12:34:16 AM by L.C.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 6/27/2017 10:00 AM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Wow, this is a questionable choice for my beloved Bobcat's. I have watched this player since he was in pee wee football and always tends to be disappointing given his size. Do not know how this player was evaluated as he was not a starter for his Jr. season, due to smaller players eating his lunch routinely. Guess size matters on this pick but fear OU is in for a rude awakening here, especially since Central Ohio has much better players at this position to be had. Best guess is a project player at best.

We don't often get posts like this, regarding new commits. The last one like this I remember was regarding Eric Herman. Sadly, that was before the BA data loss, or I'd link to it. It nearly directly mirrored your post, though. We'll come back to this post in a few years and see if you were prescient, or not.
Eric Herman started his junior year and had multiple offers. I remember he had offers from Toledeo and BGSU. This is definitely a unique offer, I have never seen us offer somebody who did not start their junior year.
ozarkcat
General User
O
Member Since: 7/20/2006
Location: MO
Post Count: 96
person
mail
ozarkcat
mail
Posted: 6/27/2017 12:45 PM
He was at the Blue-Grey All American combine at Paul Brown stadium on April 26: Their comment: ''Massive and mobile, the 6-6, 305-pound junior has some tools to work with.'' This sounds a bit some optimistic than some comments here.
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 6/27/2017 12:46 PM
allen wrote:expand_more
Eric Herman started his junior year and had multiple offers. I remember he had offers from Toledeo and BGSU. This is definitely a unique offer, I have never seen us offer somebody who did not start their junior year.

I wasn't saying that his situation was like Herman's, though there is one definite similarity. Like Gilliland, Herman was primarily recruited as a DL, but Ohio recruited him as an OL. My primary point, though, was that the post was extremely similar to one that appeared on Hermans' thread shortly after Herman gave his verbal. Shortly after Herman gave his verbal to Ohio someone posted that they had followed his career for years, that they were a big Bobcat fan, and that Ohio had made a terrible error, and that Herman was routinely dominated on the line, and that there were much better players available. It's a shame we had the data loss, or I'd find that post and link to it.

As for offering players that didn't start their Junior year, that is not that unusual. TJ Carrie and Lavon Brazill are two examples. What is different about this case is that in prior cases you had players who didn't start their Junior year, but who had outstanding Senior years, whereas in this case he has yet to prove himself on the field at the high school level since his Senior year is still ahead. My only guess is that Gilliland performed extremely well at the Ohio Camp.

I have no idea if this is a good addition or not. I agree that it's odd. We'll just have to wait and see.
Last Edited: 6/27/2017 1:12:01 PM by L.C.
Deciduous Forest Cat
General User
DFC
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: OH
Post Count: 4,558
person
mail
Deciduous Forest Cat
mail
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:15 PM
First time poster comes on and immediately badmouths a new recruit... Sorry, just seems a little agenda-driven to me.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 6/27/2017 1:53 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
Eric Herman started his junior year and had multiple offers. I remember he had offers from Toledeo and BGSU. This is definitely a unique offer, I have never seen us offer somebody who did not start their junior year.

I wasn't saying that his situation was like Herman's, though there is one definite similarity. Like Gilliland, Herman was primarily recruited as a DL, but Ohio recruited him as an OL. My primary point, though, was that the post was extremely similar to one that appeared on Hermans' thread shortly after Herman gave his verbal. Shortly after Herman gave his verbal to Ohio someone posted that they had followed his career for years, that they were a big Bobcat fan, and that Ohio had made a terrible error, and that Herman was routinely dominated on the line, and that there were much better players available. It's a shame we had the data loss, or I'd find that post and link to it.

As for offering players that didn't start their Junior year, that is not that unusual. TJ Carrie and Lavon Brazill are two examples. What is different about this case is that in prior cases you had players who didn't start their Junior year, but who had outstanding Senior years, whereas in this case he has yet to prove himself on the field at the high school level since his Senior year is still ahead. My only guess is that Gilliland performed extremely well at the Ohio Camp.

I have no idea if this is a good addition or not. I agree that it's odd. We'll just have to wait and see.
Ok, I understand.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:01 PM
I looked at one of his highlights from Hudl, he is not a bad athlete for his size. He is a little slow off the snap and he will need to get a lot stronger to play D1 ball. We need to take our time and get the best players that we can. We just had two guys get drafted, let's leverage that.
Last Edited: 6/29/2017 8:00:11 PM by allen
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:28 PM
ozarkcat wrote:expand_more
He was at the Blue-Grey All American combine at Paul Brown stadium on April 26: Their comment: ''Massive and mobile, the 6-6, 305-pound junior has some tools to work with.'' This sounds a bit some optimistic than some comments here.
For sure.

Size does matter. Back in the dark recruiting days you could coach up a 225 Fr. OL as much as you
wanted. You still ended up with a 250 pound senior that got his arse kicked by a 300 pounder.

I am cautiously optimistic and I think our recruiting success will soon heat up.
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 6/27/2017 2:32 PM
Honk your horns.

Time for me to open up that new bottle of Monkey Shoulders.

3000 posts.

And where is Monroe?
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 6/27/2017 4:41 PM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
First time poster comes on and immediately badmouths a new recruit... Sorry, just seems a little agenda-driven to me.
Yup. Appears to be some axe grinding, which, the usual suspects will quickly jump to pile on.

So far Athlon and Phil Steele have both rated Ohio's coaching as best in the MAC, so, we might just give them the benefit of the doubt. If they judged him at a camp vs other recruits they have enough to judge if he is worthy of a ship.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,792
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 6/27/2017 11:53 PM
Deciduous Forest Cat wrote:expand_more
First time poster comes on and immediately badmouths a new recruit... Sorry, just seems a little agenda-driven to me.
First time poster that happens to be "stallion", which would be Hartley's chief Catholic School competition for players in Central Ohio. Definitely some axe grinding going on here. Maybe the salt in the wound is that Hartley actually has a couple recent State Titles.
Sam bobcat
General User
SB
Member Since: 7/14/2015
Post Count: 633
person
mail
Sam bobcat
mail
Posted: 6/29/2017 11:40 PM
L.C. wrote:expand_more
O-line recruiting always seems to be more of a mystery than any other position. Perhaps it's because players almost never come in ready to play, and usually must mature for 3 years or so before they are ready. Injuries are a factor as well. In the final analysis, sometimes you get little known players who come in and play well, and sometimes you get guys that dominate in high school that come in and don't improve. That's one reason I always like to see a strong walkon program at offensive line, though it hasn't worked out that well at Ohio. A few guys have come is an walkons and done well, but not many.

When you hire a new OL coach, he gets a pass for a few years while he recruits and trains his own guys. Johnson has been at Ohio for a few years now. We'll see what sort of product he can put on the field this fall.
I'll admit, O line is the hardest position for me to judge. As for walk ons, Nick Sink from last years class looked like one of the better young lineman this spring. Hopefully he does well and earns a scholarship.
ExCat21
General User
EC21
Member Since: 9/29/2014
Post Count: 1,243
person
mail
ExCat21
mail
Posted: 7/1/2017 1:40 PM
I hope they keep him on DL. I actually like this recruit too and glad we jumped on him early. He might run a 5.5-5.9 forty yard dash, but if we can shave his time down to a sub 5.0 flat he can really pose problems for opponents. He has to learn to be more saavy with his handplay in the trenches but I trust our DL coach to coach him up there. At his size he will recquire a double team which will allow our LBs to stop the run. He's like a 2 star player with potential to be a 4 maybe 5 depending on his 4 year weightroom training. Redshirt him and this investment will have other players benefiting off of him too.
Last Edited: 7/1/2017 1:41:57 PM by ExCat21
L.C.
General User
LC
Member Since: 9/1/2005
Post Count: 10,584
person
mail
L.C.
mail
Posted: 7/4/2017 6:29 PM
Sam bobcat wrote:expand_more
Trotter and Fernandez from last years OL class seem to be busts too from what I've heard.

Trotter appear as the backup LT, per this unofficial depth chart:
http://www.ourlads.com/ncaa-football-depth-charts/depth-c...

Is it accurate? Who knows.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 32



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)