Find it hard to believe Ohio State has a better chance than Oklahoma?
Unless they are saying Oklahoma has a better chance at losing their title game than Ohio State? If that's the case, this makes sense.
I think if Oklahoma and Ohio State both win ... you have to take Oklahoma.
They will have avenged their loss ... beat a good Texas team in a title game while Ohio State still has a blowout loss to a 6-6 Purdue team and beat a 8-4 Northwestern team in the title game.
All hell will break loose if Georgia upsets Bama (which is possible)
If that happens ... you're looking at this:
1. Clemson
2. Notre Dame
3. Georgia
4. Alabama
And your B1G, Big XII and Pac 12 champs are all left out. That won't sit well.
If you want to see a change to the CFP, root for this. Might be the quickest way you'll see reform in terms of expanding from four teams..
I agree on OSU/Oklahoma. I just don't see a team that lost to a 6-6 team qualifying for the playoffs here.
I also have a problem with a team that doesn't play in a conference and a conference championship getting in. If a conference championship is one last hurdle for a team to get into the playoffs (or not), why not have a level playing field with all teams to go through that hurdle?
For how many years has the college football national championship system been broken?