menu
Logo
99+
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
99+
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Quinton Maxwell enters transfer portal
Page: 2 of 2
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,680
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 1/30/2019 9:42 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Buck.Cat wrote:expand_more
I saw Q throw a deep out against Toledo that only 10-15 people in this world could have thrown with that velocity, he has an NFL arm.
Stop.
Why? allen is only calling them as he seez 'em and he has more experience in coaching and scouting than I think that you do, unless I missed something in your background.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 1/31/2019 10:25 AM
settings_applications edit_note
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
I saw Q throw a deep out against Toledo that only 10-15 people in this world could have thrown with that velocity, he has an NFL arm.
Stop.
Why? allen is only calling them as he seez 'em and he has more experience in coaching and scouting than I think that you do, unless I missed something in your background.
I could find the whole game, he threw a shorter on at the 10 minute mark here. This is what nfl scouts look at to judge arm strength.
https://youtu.be/oXt-fsWwRuc
ExCat21
General User
EC21
Member Since: 9/29/2014
Post Count: 1,243
person
mail
ExCat21
mail
Posted: 1/31/2019 12:04 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Maxwell does have the size and an NFL arm. The question is can he get to his dropbacks from under center, can he make reads, does he know when to audible and can he make plays with his feet when the pocket breaks down. Can he command a huddle? People questioned Mitch Trubisky but he is doing fine.
Buck.Cat
General User
BC
Member Since: 12/22/2017
Post Count: 365
person
mail
Buck.Cat
mail
Posted: 1/31/2019 1:09 PM
settings_applications edit_note
OhioCatFan wrote:expand_more
Why? allen is only calling them as he seez 'em and he has more experience in coaching and scouting than I think that you do, unless I missed something in your background.
What is your background where it gives you credence to support his statement?
OhioCatFan
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Athens, OH
Post Count: 15,680
mail
OhioCatFan
mail
Posted: 1/31/2019 2:44 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Buck.Cat wrote:expand_more
Why? allen is only calling them as he seez 'em and he has more experience in coaching and scouting than I think that you do, unless I missed something in your background.
What is your background where it gives you credence to support his statement?
My training is in journalism. I'm pretty good at assessing the credibility of various sources. Doesn't mean I'm the subject expert. Just ask BTC! ;-)
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,015
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 1/31/2019 9:57 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Rourke and Maxwell are both fine college QBs. Neither will sniff playing on Sunday. Simply not among the top 100 QBs in the world. That is not a slam of them. Few QBs make it to Sunday. I wish Maxwell all the best as he departs - I hope he finds a home. And I can't wait for Rourke to be back leading the Cats next year.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 1/31/2019 10:21 PM
settings_applications edit_note
cc-cat wrote:expand_more
Rourke and Maxwell are both fine college QBs. Neither will sniff playing on Sunday. Simply not among the top 100 QBs in the world. That is not a slam of them. Few QBs make it to Sunday. I wish Maxwell all the best as he departs - I hope he finds a home. And I can't wait for Rourke to be back leading the Cats next year.
I think Rourke will play on Sundays, he is a top 100 qb in the world, Q is a different story, but he does have a cannon and is a great athlete.
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,015
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 1/31/2019 10:50 PM
settings_applications edit_note
He would need to become a much more accurate passer across the whole tree. He is too small (and slow) to have value as a ruining QB. We can root him on, but top 100 - not. Plus next year's draft is stacked at the QB position wit guys like Fromm, Herbert, Tagovailoa, who are top 100 guys. Let's simply enjoy the show.
Last Edited: 1/31/2019 11:03:34 PM by cc-cat
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,795
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 1/31/2019 11:11 PM
settings_applications edit_note
allen wrote:expand_more
Rourke and Maxwell are both fine college QBs. Neither will sniff playing on Sunday. Simply not among the top 100 QBs in the world. That is not a slam of them. Few QBs make it to Sunday. I wish Maxwell all the best as he departs - I hope he finds a home. And I can't wait for Rourke to be back leading the Cats next year.
I think Rourke will play on Sundays, he is a top 100 qb in the world, Q is a different story, but he does have a cannon and is a great athlete.
Does Canada play on Sunday? Because that’s where he is going, same with Irons.
Kevin Finnegan
General User
KF
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Location: Rockton, IL
Post Count: 1,214
person
mail
Kevin Finnegan
mail
Posted: 2/1/2019 9:13 AM
settings_applications edit_note
BillyTheCat wrote:expand_more
Rourke and Maxwell are both fine college QBs. Neither will sniff playing on Sunday. Simply not among the top 100 QBs in the world. That is not a slam of them. Few QBs make it to Sunday. I wish Maxwell all the best as he departs - I hope he finds a home. And I can't wait for Rourke to be back leading the Cats next year.
I think Rourke will play on Sundays, he is a top 100 qb in the world, Q is a different story, but he does have a cannon and is a great athlete.
Does Canada play on Sunday? Because that’s where he is going, same with Irons.
I believe that Nathan has NFL abilities, though they may not be at the QB level. I think a creative coach/GM could see Nathan in the ilk of Julian Edelman or Taysom Hill. He is incredibly athletic, and while his accuracy may keep him from taking snaps directly in NFL, I think he could easily be on the field there.
spongeBOB CATpants
General User
Member Since: 8/16/2016
Post Count: 1,348
mail
spongeBOB CATpants
mail
Posted: 2/1/2019 9:41 AM
settings_applications edit_note
So where do we think Quinton ends up? Its an interesting situation as some on here believe he is a legitimate athlete with a plus arm but coming from a MAC school with limited starts since 2016.
Kevin Finnegan
General User
KF
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Location: Rockton, IL
Post Count: 1,214
person
mail
Kevin Finnegan
mail
Posted: 2/1/2019 10:16 AM
settings_applications edit_note
If you enter the portal, does it definitely mean youŕe transferring? I think his best chance to play in 2019 is probably at OHIO. Rourke has fortunately not been hampered by injuries in his career, but he exposes himself to contact quite a lot. In the event of a Rourke injury, Q is the most logical successor.
bobcatsquared
General User
B
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 5,845
person
mail
bobcatsquared
mail
Posted: 2/1/2019 10:35 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Not obligated to transfer if entered into the portal.
Last Edited: 2/1/2019 10:35:38 AM by bobcatsquared
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 2/1/2019 12:28 PM
settings_applications edit_note
finnOhio wrote:expand_more
Rourke and Maxwell are both fine college QBs. Neither will sniff playing on Sunday. Simply not among the top 100 QBs in the world. That is not a slam of them. Few QBs make it to Sunday. I wish Maxwell all the best as he departs - I hope he finds a home. And I can't wait for Rourke to be back leading the Cats next year.
I think Rourke will play on Sundays, he is a top 100 qb in the world, Q is a different story, but he does have a cannon and is a great athlete.
Does Canada play on Sunday? Because that’s where he is going, same with Irons.
I believe that Nathan has NFL abilities, though they may not be at the QB level. I think a creative coach/GM could see Nathan in the ilk of Julian Edelman or Taysom Hill. He is incredibly athletic, and while his accuracy may keep him from taking snaps directly in NFL, I think he could easily be on the field there.
I love Rourke at the collegiate level but no way he plays in the NFL. Not only is he not accurate, he doesn't have the requisite arm strength for the NFL. And running QBs don't last in the NFL.

Interesting thought about Rourke in another position. I could very well be wrong, but I don't think he nearly has the athleticism as former Kent State QB Julian Edelman. I think Rourke's too slow to play wide receiver in the next level and I have no idea what kind of route runner he'd be.

But hey, maybe I'll be eating crow in 2 years. Sure wouldn't be the first time!
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 2/1/2019 12:36 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Mark Lembright '85 wrote:expand_more
Rourke and Maxwell are both fine college QBs. Neither will sniff playing on Sunday. Simply not among the top 100 QBs in the world. That is not a slam of them. Few QBs make it to Sunday. I wish Maxwell all the best as he departs - I hope he finds a home. And I can't wait for Rourke to be back leading the Cats next year.
I think Rourke will play on Sundays, he is a top 100 qb in the world, Q is a different story, but he does have a cannon and is a great athlete.
Does Canada play on Sunday? Because that’s where he is going, same with Irons.
I believe that Nathan has NFL abilities, though they may not be at the QB level. I think a creative coach/GM could see Nathan in the ilk of Julian Edelman or Taysom Hill. He is incredibly athletic, and while his accuracy may keep him from taking snaps directly in NFL, I think he could easily be on the field there.
I love Rourke at the collegiate level but no way he plays in the NFL. Not only is he not accurate, he doesn't have the requisite arm strength for the NFL. And running QBs don't last in the NFL.

Interesting thought about Rourke in another position. I could very well be wrong, but I don't think he nearly has the athleticism as former Kent State QB Julian Edelman. I think Rourke's too slow to play wide receiver in the next level and I have no idea what kind of route runner he'd be.

But hey, maybe I'll be eating crow in 2 years. Sure wouldn't be the first time!
First round pick....CFL.
Mark Lembright '85
General User
ML85
Member Since: 8/22/2010
Location: Highland Heights, OH
Post Count: 2,460
person
mail
Mark Lembright '85
mail
Posted: 2/1/2019 12:39 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Doc Bobcat wrote:expand_more
Rourke and Maxwell are both fine college QBs. Neither will sniff playing on Sunday. Simply not among the top 100 QBs in the world. That is not a slam of them. Few QBs make it to Sunday. I wish Maxwell all the best as he departs - I hope he finds a home. And I can't wait for Rourke to be back leading the Cats next year.
I think Rourke will play on Sundays, he is a top 100 qb in the world, Q is a different story, but he does have a cannon and is a great athlete.
Does Canada play on Sunday? Because that’s where he is going, same with Irons.
I believe that Nathan has NFL abilities, though they may not be at the QB level. I think a creative coach/GM could see Nathan in the ilk of Julian Edelman or Taysom Hill. He is incredibly athletic, and while his accuracy may keep him from taking snaps directly in NFL, I think he could easily be on the field there.
I love Rourke at the collegiate level but no way he plays in the NFL. Not only is he not accurate, he doesn't have the requisite arm strength for the NFL. And running QBs don't last in the NFL.

Interesting thought about Rourke in another position. I could very well be wrong, but I don't think he nearly has the athleticism as former Kent State QB Julian Edelman. I think Rourke's too slow to play wide receiver in the next level and I have no idea what kind of route runner he'd be.

But hey, maybe I'll be eating crow in 2 years. Sure wouldn't be the first time!
First round pick....CFL.
Actually, with the wide open field and unique rules the CFL has on offense, I think Rourke's game transitions quite well to the CFL. Nothing wrong with that at all. He'd definitely be a better CFL QB than Manziel.
BillyTheCat
General User
BTC
Member Since: 10/6/2012
Post Count: 10,795
person
mail
BillyTheCat
mail
Posted: 2/1/2019 2:15 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Doc Bobcat wrote:expand_more
Rourke and Maxwell are both fine college QBs. Neither will sniff playing on Sunday. Simply not among the top 100 QBs in the world. That is not a slam of them. Few QBs make it to Sunday. I wish Maxwell all the best as he departs - I hope he finds a home. And I can't wait for Rourke to be back leading the Cats next year.
I think Rourke will play on Sundays, he is a top 100 qb in the world, Q is a different story, but he does have a cannon and is a great athlete.
Does Canada play on Sunday? Because that’s where he is going, same with Irons.
I believe that Nathan has NFL abilities, though they may not be at the QB level. I think a creative coach/GM could see Nathan in the ilk of Julian Edelman or Taysom Hill. He is incredibly athletic, and while his accuracy may keep him from taking snaps directly in NFL, I think he could easily be on the field there.
I love Rourke at the collegiate level but no way he plays in the NFL. Not only is he not accurate, he doesn't have the requisite arm strength for the NFL. And running QBs don't last in the NFL.

Interesting thought about Rourke in another position. I could very well be wrong, but I don't think he nearly has the athleticism as former Kent State QB Julian Edelman. I think Rourke's too slow to play wide receiver in the next level and I have no idea what kind of route runner he'd be.

But hey, maybe I'll be eating crow in 2 years. Sure wouldn't be the first time!
First round pick....CFL.
Yep! And I say so will Irons
cc-cat
General User
C
Member Since: 4/5/2006
Location: matthews, NC
Post Count: 4,015
person
mail
cc-cat
mail
Posted: 2/3/2019 3:47 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Florida State - smh - just kidding
BryanHall
General User
BH
Member Since: 9/12/2010
Post Count: 620
person
mail
BryanHall
mail
Posted: 2/3/2019 7:28 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Mark Lembright '85 wrote:expand_more
Rourke and Maxwell are both fine college QBs. Neither will sniff playing on Sunday. Simply not among the top 100 QBs in the world. That is not a slam of them. Few QBs make it to Sunday. I wish Maxwell all the best as he departs - I hope he finds a home. And I can't wait for Rourke to be back leading the Cats next year.
I think Rourke will play on Sundays, he is a top 100 qb in the world, Q is a different story, but he does have a cannon and is a great athlete.
Does Canada play on Sunday? Because that’s where he is going, same with Irons.
I believe that Nathan has NFL abilities, though they may not be at the QB level. I think a creative coach/GM could see Nathan in the ilk of Julian Edelman or Taysom Hill. He is incredibly athletic, and while his accuracy may keep him from taking snaps directly in NFL, I think he could easily be on the field there.
I love Rourke at the collegiate level but no way he plays in the NFL. Not only is he not accurate, he doesn't have the requisite arm strength for the NFL. And running QBs don't last in the NFL.

Interesting thought about Rourke in another position. I could very well be wrong, but I don't think he nearly has the athleticism as former Kent State QB Julian Edelman. I think Rourke's too slow to play wide receiver in the next level and I have no idea what kind of route runner he'd be.

But hey, maybe I'll be eating crow in 2 years. Sure wouldn't be the first time!
First round pick....CFL.
Actually, with the wide open field and unique rules the CFL has on offense, I think Rourke's game transitions quite well to the CFL. Nothing wrong with that at all. He'd definitely be a better CFL QB than Manziel.
Each CFL team has to have 20 "nationals" on its game roster. Rourke is very valuable, even as a 3rd QB. I'd expect him to have a long CFL career, even if he isn't a star. I'd expect Irons to get a decent chance as well.
UpSan Bobcat
General User
Member Since: 8/30/2005
Location: Upper Sandusky, OH
Post Count: 3,817
mail
UpSan Bobcat
mail
Posted: 2/3/2019 8:08 PM
settings_applications edit_note
BryanHall wrote:expand_more
Rourke and Maxwell are both fine college QBs. Neither will sniff playing on Sunday. Simply not among the top 100 QBs in the world. That is not a slam of them. Few QBs make it to Sunday. I wish Maxwell all the best as he departs - I hope he finds a home. And I can't wait for Rourke to be back leading the Cats next year.
I think Rourke will play on Sundays, he is a top 100 qb in the world, Q is a different story, but he does have a cannon and is a great athlete.
Does Canada play on Sunday? Because that’s where he is going, same with Irons.
I believe that Nathan has NFL abilities, though they may not be at the QB level. I think a creative coach/GM could see Nathan in the ilk of Julian Edelman or Taysom Hill. He is incredibly athletic, and while his accuracy may keep him from taking snaps directly in NFL, I think he could easily be on the field there.
I love Rourke at the collegiate level but no way he plays in the NFL. Not only is he not accurate, he doesn't have the requisite arm strength for the NFL. And running QBs don't last in the NFL.

Interesting thought about Rourke in another position. I could very well be wrong, but I don't think he nearly has the athleticism as former Kent State QB Julian Edelman. I think Rourke's too slow to play wide receiver in the next level and I have no idea what kind of route runner he'd be.

But hey, maybe I'll be eating crow in 2 years. Sure wouldn't be the first time!
First round pick....CFL.
Actually, with the wide open field and unique rules the CFL has on offense, I think Rourke's game transitions quite well to the CFL. Nothing wrong with that at all. He'd definitely be a better CFL QB than Manziel.
Each CFL team has to have 20 "nationals" on its game roster. Rourke is very valuable, even as a 3rd QB. I'd expect him to have a long CFL career, even if he isn't a star. I'd expect Irons to get a decent chance as well.
The CFL Scouting Bureau ranks Irons as the eighth-best draft eligible player, up from #11 before the season. Seniors at Canadian universities and Canadians in the NCAA are eligible for the draft.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 2/6/2019 8:21 PM
settings_applications edit_note
He’s gone per Arlkey through Solich
Bcat2
General User
B2
Member Since: 7/6/2010
Post Count: 4,295
person
mail
Bcat2
mail
Posted: 2/6/2019 9:37 PM
settings_applications edit_note
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
He’s gone per Arlkey through Solich
Some more detail. Still in school and still working with the team, but, Arkley reports team "will" have a new backup QB next season.
allen
General User
A
Member Since: 1/24/2006
Post Count: 4,638
person
mail
allen
mail
Posted: 3/5/2019 9:13 PM
settings_applications edit_note
bobcatgrad
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Nagoya, Japan
Post Count: 348
mail
bobcatgrad
mail
Posted: 3/5/2019 10:21 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Interesting. Wherever Quinton ends up landing, I hope he does well and will be rooting for his success. I really feel like he gave his all and worked hard during his time as a Bobcat.
Last Edited: 3/5/2019 10:21:59 PM by bobcatgrad
spongeBOB CATpants
General User
Member Since: 8/16/2016
Post Count: 1,348
mail
spongeBOB CATpants
mail
Posted: 3/6/2019 8:56 AM
settings_applications edit_note
allen wrote:expand_more
"Ohio St isn't on my mind."

I love that.
Showing Messages: 26 - 50 of 50
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
chevron_backward
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)