It's interesting, and important, to take a deeper look at the Bobcats performance as they move into their toughest 3-game stretch of the season. Starting with a visit to Heinz Field to battle ACC representative Pittsburgh and coach Pat Narduzzi.
The folks who take that deeper look? Pro Football Focus. Here's how they saw Ohio's performance on Saturday.
--
Full Article w/grades:
https://www.wathsportsfan.com/bobcatinsider/pro-football-... Top 5 graded Bobcats
1. QB - Nathan Rourke - 92.4
2. WR - Tyler Tupa - .....
Full Article w/grades:
https://www.wathsportsfan.com/bobcatinsider/pro-football-... Skill Positions (QB, WR, RB, TE) - 76.7
Offensive Line - ??
Defensive Line-Linebackers - ??
Defensive Backs - ??
Yeah, there must be a lot that goes into the grades because sometimes the results dont seem to reflect the grades.
Not trying to hate, trying to understand.
For instance, the Bobcats' offensive line score of 65.9.
I understand that its a team sport and the success of the offense to an extent involves how the other parts of the offense is performing and the defense, but how would a 65 out of 100 makes sense for the offensive line who: rushed for 7.3 yards a carry on 38 carries? Yielded 1 sack and 2 pressures for the entire game? Did not punt a single time? Dont know if URI was graded by PFF but did their d-line grade at 50%?
Its not like Rourke or the RBs/Receivers were under duress the entire game and really overcame a poor offensive line performance.
Judging on the eye test, I dont think the offensive line got an A plus but they were pretty darn effective as a Unit, no? what else really should they have done better?