Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Official Game 1 Thread: Rutgers
Page: 6 of 7
mail
LuckySparrow
8/28/2025 9:47 PM
Offense: A-
Defense: D-
Special Teams: F

I can't say enough great things about Parker Navarro and Smith's offense in general. The play designs and play calling are excellent. Hendricks with a great breakout game, and some TEs involved early!

Hauser did a nice job getting the defense adjusted for the 2nd half.

Special Teams was a black hole disaster! KILLED US.

Great entertainment, though, even if the games these days are a bit rigged for the big schools. Non-calls and puzzling calls against Ohio at important moments.
mail
person
Bobcat1998
8/28/2025 9:47 PM
Rollie Merriman wrote:expand_more
Bobcats played well! Two areas that probably cost us the game. The block punt and Rut going 5 for 5 on fourth downs!
Absolutely! Remember though we got torched by Cuse last year and rebounded. This was a great effort!
mail
person
Cbus Convo
8/28/2025 9:59 PM
The defensive holding call occurred on 3rd down. If instead it’s a no call, then it would have been 4th down, Rutgers would have gone for it, and Rutgers would have converted. It was that kind of night.
mail
person
Bobcat1998
8/28/2025 10:00 PM
LuckySparrow wrote:expand_more
Offense: A-
Defense: D-
Special Teams: F

I can't say enough great things about Parker Navarro and Smith's offense in general. The play designs and play calling are excellent. Hendricks with a great breakout game, and some TEs involved early!

Hauser did a nice job getting the defense adjusted for the 2nd half.

Special Teams was a black hole disaster! KILLED US.

Great entertainment, though, even if the games these days are a bit rigged for the big schools. Non-calls and puzzling calls against Ohio at important moments.
Defense was a C- and Spec Teams a D-. Kicker wasn't awful. Dennis is going to return a few for TDs and fumble 2! Punter is awful. Our D sucked early last year and then found its footing. Overall a B effort overall!
mail
person
MonroeClassmate
8/28/2025 10:50 PM
Now at the hotel...

Fun atmosphere. Walking by invited into a tailgate that was fantastic! Shout out to Rutgers Fans.

Clean up the illegal procedures on offense to not slow/stop a drive and we may beat them Mountaineers!
mail
person
Victory
8/28/2025 11:11 PM
LuckySparrow wrote:expand_more
Offense: A-
Defense: D-
Special Teams: F

I can't say enough great things about Parker Navarro and Smith's offense in general. The play designs and play calling are excellent. Hendricks with a great breakout game, and some TEs involved early!

Hauser did a nice job getting the defense adjusted for the 2nd half.

Special Teams was a black hole disaster! KILLED US.

Great entertainment, though, even if the games these days are a bit rigged for the big schools. Non-calls and puzzling calls against Ohio at important moments.
The first couple of long snaps looked bad and then the blocked punt looked worse. Did anyone notice if we switched long snappers at that point?
mail
OhioCatFan
8/29/2025 12:26 AM
Three non-calls on defensive pass inference were, IMHO, the difference in the game. One in the first half was so atrocious that a Rutgers fan in front of me turned around when he heard me yelling at the ref, and said, “Yes that was blatant interference.” This no call gave the ball to RU since it was then 4th down rather than a 1st down if the call had been made. Another one occurred right in front of me where a Rutgers player basically did a rolling tackle of a potential OHIO receiver with a ref looking right at the play and did nothing. Reminds me of the last time I saw an OHIO-Rutgers game and the refs called defensive pass interference against us when the RU player pushed off an Ohio defender in what should have been an obvious offensive pass interference. I had a better view of that play than the ref did, but it still should have been obvious from his vantage point. B10/18 refs are RU seem not to be the best in the business. I’m not a happy camper at the moment.

My grades:

Offense A-
Defense D+ (C+ the second half)
Special teams F-
mail
person
RufusCat09
8/29/2025 3:16 AM
Just watched the highlights from the game since I wasn't able to watch it live (time zone issues).

Tank got lit up pretty good last night. Saw a bunch of missed tackles from DJ Walker as well. Hopefully all that preseason hype did not go to their heads.

Overall, I'm still pretty impressed with how the game turned out. We were like 15.5 underdogs in the game so clearly no one had faith in us to keep it close. Lots of positives to take away. Unfortunate with the blocked punt. Offense is dangerous, especially if we keep the TEs involved like we did last night.

Also, look at last year with the Syracuse game. Lost by 16 but look at how the rest of the season turned out.
mail
person
RufusCat09
8/29/2025 3:26 AM
Kudos to the offensive line. They did not give up a sack last night.
mail
OUcats82
8/29/2025 7:23 AM
Would have loved to get the win but some good things from the game, especially the offense and what seemed to be good defensive adjustments in the second half (I was only able to follow the game on the ESPN game tracker so I could be off here).

What was the amount of the check that comes back to Athens for this game?

If the Cats can put up this kind of effort in the MAC, buckle down earlier on D, and clean up STs it will be a fun season!
mail
person
BillyTheCat
8/29/2025 8:13 AM
Cbus Convo wrote:expand_more
The defensive holding call occurred on 3rd down. If instead it’s a no call, then it would have been 4th down, Rutgers would have gone for it, and Rutgers would have converted. It was that kind of night.
That holding call was money. Clear grab and restrict on the receiver as he tried to break into his route over the middle. Most definitely impeded his progress.
mail
shabamon
8/29/2025 8:24 AM
I am very very encouraged for MAC play. However, I will be very very surprised if we beat WVU, and I will be very very surprised if we present as halfway competent against Ohio State.

I don't know how I feel about the Gardner-Webb date. On one hand, a reset game after this gauntlet is nice to have especially if a few guys get dinged up. On the other, it would have been great to give this defense more of a tune-up early.
mail
Andrew Ruck
8/29/2025 8:38 AM
Frustrating loss. Glad we competed but I have trouble being content with a moral victory. We outplayed them.

Credit Schiano's giant balls going 5 for 5 on 4th down, a couple of which were crazy. That's the biggest difference in the game.

The blocked punt feels big, but let's be honest...with our defense 1st half and our Punter...without the blocked punt we kick it to the 50 and they have a 6 play drive in for a TD anyway. Ironically it may have allowed us the clock to get the big long FG drive to end the 1st half.

The holding penalty...did anyone actually see it? Broadcast didn't really show it, or I did not see it thru my rage. I thought we had the victory for those 3 seconds between thinking they are punting us the ball back and that damn flag. What makes it most upsetting is they called nothing all game, allowed all kinds of grabbing on the lines, contact in the secondary, etc. To make that call there it better have been egregious. Did not take long to be reminded how incredibly infuriating the game of football can be.

Tank Pearson had an awful game. What's the deal with that? He was supposed to be the defensive piece we weren't worried about. I have faith this defense will improve as the weeks go by, just as they did the last 2 seasons.

Parker single handedly will make us competitive in every game (except the outlier in competition OSU). What an incredible run of QBs we have experienced with Rourke/Rourke/Parker.

And Hendricks in for the big year we all expected. He's a beast.
Last Edited: 8/29/2025 8:39:48 AM by Andrew Ruck
mail
person
bobcatsquared
8/29/2025 9:11 AM
Andrew Ruck wrote:expand_more
The holding penalty...did anyone actually see it? Broadcast didn't really show it, or I did not see it thru my rage.
I'm hoping it shows up (doesn't show up) on the game film and someone will speak up about the (terrible) call.
mail
person
bobcatsquared
8/29/2025 9:16 AM
Andrew Ruck wrote:expand_more
Parker single handedly will make us competitive in every game (except the outlier in competition OSU). What an incredible run of QBs we have experienced with Rourke/Rourke/Parker.
A lot of good things have been said on here about how Parker played last night. One thing I don't believe has been mentioned is how much his targets were spread out. Hendricks had a break out game with 9 catches, but five Bobcats had 2 receptions each - Rodarte, Pugh, Bruno, Gossett and Williams. Bangura had one catch out of the backfield and even Marinaro had one out of the center position. And I can think of at least one target for Harris.
mail
person
MonroeClassmate
8/29/2025 10:02 AM
Associative law: Red chickens travel to Rutgers next--can we learn how the two MAC teams look early in the season with the common opponent?
mail
M.D.W.S.T
8/29/2025 10:16 AM
I re-watched a lot of the game this morning... (I made the mistake of re-watching some of those bail out calls for Rutgers as well - we weren't victims of the moment, they were THAT bad and I'm pissed for the team)



My digested takeaways...

- Parker. I'm not certain that is the same kid from the beginning of last year. UCF is kicking themselves. I'm guilty as anyone of being overly critical during games, but he played about as good as I've seen any QB play in one of these MAC v G4 match-ups.

Finn last night threw 2 picks and Miami looked like a dear in headlights. Wisconsin was ranked 40 in ESPN's power index, Rutgers 42. They managed just 117 total yards vs OU's 440 on Rutgers.

- Hendricks stepping right into Wigs/Owen shoes and not skipping a beat. Rodarte and Pugh also had some big catches. Mason and Bruno coming down with some strong TD's. I like what I see.

- Sieh is still good at football, so that's nice. Flow of the game didn't really allow for more carries, but he needs more carries (had 16). We NEED him going early. He should be over 20 every game.

In games Sieh has at least 20 carries, OU is 8-1 (Toledo MACC is the lone L)
In total OU wins he averages 18 carries for 90 yards. In losses, just 12 carries.

- Defense was bizarre. First half there was no defense. They were playing prevent D (still not preventing squat) and letting them chip down the field. If the RB got through the first line, he was gone for an easy 5. Both RB's averaged over 6 yards a carry. The back-up had 10 carries for 70 yards. 2nd half Rutgers couldn't convert. Defense held. Whatever happened in that locker room at half - kudos.

- Brian. He's gonna be a good one. Crisp offense. No offensive turnovers. Out schemed Schiano all night. Schiano has brass balls for going for so many 4th downs, but we were giving up yards in bunches, so I would've gone for it too. Without a few 'lucky' 4th down conversions, we're talking about a win today even with the ref gifting Rutgers multiple calls.

- Scott. Good for you buddy. I dont know how much was Brian and how much was Scott, but the offense was ready and on it. Clean up the snaps. I think he will get better as this was his first FBS game, and coming against a Big 10 team on the road... not an easy task.

- House. We gotta get tougher on D. Obviously, especially on 4th down. I think they went soft as to not get beat early, and we got beat early anyway. They turned it around, by that point the hole was too deep.

- Crable. Great sack. Tank great job opening the lane.

- Adonis had about 40 tackles. Not sure I want my safety leading the team in tackles, but we'll get better.

- DB's had trouble with their duo of 6'3"+ receivers. Not sure outside of Ohio State we'll run into that again.



All in all... what a game. I think WVU's eyes just got a little bit wider. As did the rest of the MAC. I hate a moral victory, but as far as losses go - they put some teams on notice, where as Miami got steamrolled.
Last Edited: 8/29/2025 10:21:45 AM by M.D.W.S.T
mail
OhioCatFan
8/29/2025 10:20 AM
MonroeClassmate wrote:expand_more
Associative law: Red chickens travel to Rutgers next--can we learn how the two MAC teams look early in the season with the common opponent?
Watched a little of Miami’s 17-0 loss to Wisconsin when I got back to the hotel in Piscataway. My only conclusion is that they have a better run defense than we do, which ain’t saying much. And, that we have a better offense.
mail
spongeBOB CATpants
8/29/2025 10:53 AM
Tend to agree with those saying the refs influenced the outcome more than the blocked punt. Rutgers is probably going to score if we get the punt off anyway based on what we saw from the defense early on. The extra time on the clock may have actually helped us.

The no targeting call...I'm at a loss of words. I knew as soon as the big 10 rules official came on saying there wasn't much there to make a call, that Weaver was safe. I can't stand the blatant lying to our faces. That was textbook targeting in multiple ways. So rigged, shameful.

Any word on Hendricks? Came up limping with what looked like hamstring issues twice. Hoping it was just cramping but trying to fight through that is playing with fire. If that hammy pops he's done for 4-6 weeks with high risk of reinjury.

Moral victories suck so I'm not going to call it that and I hope the team isn't viewing it that way either. Lot of positives but equal amount of negatives IMO. We looked like the better team and the better coach for a good portion of the game.

Bring on the mountaineers, I think we're in store for one of the biggest games in program history.
mail
STVCastle
8/29/2025 12:21 PM
I do think we should take a glass half-full approach to this. Yeah, losing any game stinks.

What I did like:
1) The Bobcats tried to fight through adversity.
We were down 31-14 late in the 2nd qtr. We could have easily packed our bags and went "Yeah, Rutgers will crush us." But we didn't. We kept fighting. That right there is a positive and reassuring imo.

2) Parker Navarro
Just saying the guy's name is probably enough, but he's one of the main reasons why we even stayed in this game. He helped move the team forward.

Consider this: Rutgers HC Greg Schiano went for it about every time on 4th down. He knew that if he gave the ball back to Parker in the 4th, we could be talking about a Bobcat victory.

3) Some adjustments were made on D.
I say some, because there were other adjustments that weren't made. The ones that were made were clearly seen in the 2nd Half.

What I did not like:
1) Special Teams were terrible.
The blocked punt for a Rutgers TD. The squib kick out of bounds in the 1st qtr for no reason. Magnus' punting in general. Just... please fix that asap.

2) Run D wasn't great. Pass D was blown up here and there all game.
Broken tackles for big gains vs. the run. Tank Pearson wasn't his usual self defending the pass.

One thing I wish our D would change in approach because I saw this last year too: Our CBs simply give up too much space to the WRs/TEs. By the time they catch the ball, our corners are still yards away. That needs to change. Stop giving up so much space.

3) Bad calls by the B1G refs.
That no-call for targeting by Weaver was terrible. Late defensive holding call on us which I don't think we could ever see. I'm not surprised by these bad calls but it's annoying when they happen.

Overall:
To get through as much stuff as we did and only lose 34-31 is reassuring, as crazy as that sounds. If nothing else, I hope that this serves as a wake-up call for the Bobcats when they prepare for the home opener vs. West Virginia. Consider if any of the things that happened here didn't, we may be talking about a Bobcat victory instead. We're closer than what we think. Fix certain things and it may swing back into our favor.
mail
person
OUs LONG Driver
8/29/2025 12:46 PM
STVCastle wrote:expand_more
I do think we should take a glass half-full approach to this. Yeah, losing any game stinks.

What I did like:
1) The Bobcats tried to fight through adversity.
We were down 31-14 late in the 2nd qtr. We could have easily packed our bags and went "Yeah, Rutgers will crush us." But we didn't. We kept fighting. That right there is a positive and reassuring imo.

2) Parker Navarro
Just saying the guy's name is probably enough, but he's one of the main reasons why we even stayed in this game. He helped move the team forward.

Consider this: Rutgers HC Greg Schiano went for it about every time on 4th down. He knew that if he gave the ball back to Parker in the 4th, we could be talking about a Bobcat victory.

3) Some adjustments were made on D.
I say some, because there were other adjustments that weren't made. The ones that were made were clearly seen in the 2nd Half.

What I did not like:
1) Special Teams were terrible.
The blocked punt for a Rutgers TD. The squib kick out of bounds in the 1st qtr for no reason. Magnus' punting in general. Just... please fix that asap.

2) Run D wasn't great. Pass D was blown up here and there all game.
Broken tackles for big gains vs. the run. Tank Pearson wasn't his usual self defending the pass.

One thing I wish our D would change in approach because I saw this last year too: Our CBs simply give up too much space to the WRs/TEs. By the time they catch the ball, our corners are still yards away. That needs to change. Stop giving up so much space.

3) Bad calls by the B1G refs.
That no-call for targeting by Weaver was terrible. Late defensive holding call on us which I don't think we could ever see. I'm not surprised by these bad calls but it's annoying when they happen.

Overall:
To get through as much stuff as we did and only lose 34-31 is reassuring, as crazy as that sounds. If nothing else, I hope that this serves as a wake-up call for the Bobcats when they prepare for the home opener vs. West Virginia. Consider if any of the things that happened here didn't, we may be talking about a Bobcat victory instead. We're closer than what we think. Fix certain things and it may swing back into our favor.
I think the squib kick out of bounds was an attempt to hit a Rutgers player and get a recovery as plan A, and Plan B was worst case scenario spotting it on the 20 due to the penalty on the touchdown prior. If he kicks it in the air and it's either fair caught or goes into the endzone for a touchback it's coming out to the 25, right? Maybe I'm off here but I don't think that particular play was an error.
mail
person
SBH
8/29/2025 1:20 PM
Based on my opportunity to watch a recent practice, I had VERY low expectations for special teams and they failed even to meet those. (I'll add that we all should hope we never have to count on an onside kick. Keystone Kops.) BTW, we have a freshman punter who really booms the ball but are depending on a transfer who failed to earn playing time during three years at Kent State.
Last Edited: 8/29/2025 1:32:39 PM by SBH
mail
Mike Coleman
8/29/2025 1:50 PM
DBs better get get a bump from G1 to G2 as WVU has a Jax St transfer what had about 200 yards against us in the bowl game.
mail
Mike Coleman
8/29/2025 1:51 PM
OUs LONG Driver wrote:expand_more
I do think we should take a glass half-full approach to this. Yeah, losing any game stinks.

What I did like:
1) The Bobcats tried to fight through adversity.
We were down 31-14 late in the 2nd qtr. We could have easily packed our bags and went "Yeah, Rutgers will crush us." But we didn't. We kept fighting. That right there is a positive and reassuring imo.

2) Parker Navarro
Just saying the guy's name is probably enough, but he's one of the main reasons why we even stayed in this game. He helped move the team forward.

Consider this: Rutgers HC Greg Schiano went for it about every time on 4th down. He knew that if he gave the ball back to Parker in the 4th, we could be talking about a Bobcat victory.

3) Some adjustments were made on D.
I say some, because there were other adjustments that weren't made. The ones that were made were clearly seen in the 2nd Half.

What I did not like:
1) Special Teams were terrible.
The blocked punt for a Rutgers TD. The squib kick out of bounds in the 1st qtr for no reason. Magnus' punting in general. Just... please fix that asap.

2) Run D wasn't great. Pass D was blown up here and there all game.
Broken tackles for big gains vs. the run. Tank Pearson wasn't his usual self defending the pass.

One thing I wish our D would change in approach because I saw this last year too: Our CBs simply give up too much space to the WRs/TEs. By the time they catch the ball, our corners are still yards away. That needs to change. Stop giving up so much space.

3) Bad calls by the B1G refs.
That no-call for targeting by Weaver was terrible. Late defensive holding call on us which I don't think we could ever see. I'm not surprised by these bad calls but it's annoying when they happen.

Overall:
To get through as much stuff as we did and only lose 34-31 is reassuring, as crazy as that sounds. If nothing else, I hope that this serves as a wake-up call for the Bobcats when they prepare for the home opener vs. West Virginia. Consider if any of the things that happened here didn't, we may be talking about a Bobcat victory instead. We're closer than what we think. Fix certain things and it may swing back into our favor.
I think the squib kick out of bounds was an attempt to hit a Rutgers player and get a recovery as plan A, and Plan B was worst case scenario spotting it on the 20 due to the penalty on the touchdown prior. If he kicks it in the air and it's either fair caught or goes into the endzone for a touchback it's coming out to the 25, right? Maybe I'm off here but I don't think that particular play was an error.

I think you're right.
mail
person
RufusCat09
8/29/2025 2:02 PM
Anyone noteable injuries to report?
Showing Messages: 126 - 150 of 154
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)