We hear that our recruiting is good but never considered the best in the conference, why is that?
Regarding recruiting, I find it more useful to consider output vs input. The "input" is the rankings by the recruiting services. The "output" is the play on the field. Admittedly, I don't keep up with this stuff very closely (it bores me), but I have to believe when OU makes it to the MACC they probably still began the prior seasons without a high recruiting ranking.
Bottom line, is our team as talented as our peers? Overall, I would say yes, with a few areas that need improvement. For me, that improvement may be most severe on the OL. Rourke was running for his life against Miami. How many times was he under heavy pressure? To say he has regressed, without mentioning the OL, is not a fair assessment. I mentioned earlier that Rourke appeared nervous, uneasy. How much of that is true, and how much of that is due to his confidence in his protection?