Interesting perspective, Jeff. What do those critics have to say about diversity and equity as a core values of a university? Assuming the goal is to eliminate grant-based ICA for some, what is their investment strategy to recruit/retain/graduate students of color and women to replace them? Would they reduce the portion of the student fee going to athletics as a rebate of sorts to other students and, if so, how do they make up for the greater than 50% of those funds going back to the university for direct instructional costs (>$7 million) and indirect line room/board (>$1 million)? What is their strategy to engage and retain the sponsorships/memberships currently going to athletics which also benefit other university priorities (ex. - Pepsi contract)?
I agree, Joe. If there is ever an actual conversation or debate among the parties, your points would be salient for sure. Problem is getting people to actually listen to each other.
Last Edited: 11/27/2019 10:46:07 PM by Jeff McKinney