menu
Logo
99+
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
99+
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Does Rourke have naked pictures of somebody?
Page: 1 of 2
mail
greencat
9/13/2021 2:49 PM
Rourke QB rating: 124
Rogers QB rating: 184

When does Rogers get a fair shot a playing time? I knows the old saying about the most popular guy in town is always the backup QB, whatever. But seriously, who here didn't think he would have 400 total yards of offense vs Duquesne? Not 168+28 for less than 200.
mail
UpSan Bobcat
9/13/2021 3:09 PM
greencat wrote:expand_more
Rourke QB rating: 124
Rogers QB rating: 184

When does Rogers get a fair shot a playing time? I knows the old saying about the most popular guy in town is always the backup QB, whatever. But seriously, who here didn't think he would have 400 total yards of offense vs Duquesne? Not 168+28 for less than 200.
His one completion was badly underthrown but the guy was open enough to still catch it. He's thrown another incompletion and was sacked in a key situation. He's rushed for -4 yards. I don't see him as anything more than what he's been.
mail
person
Cats5
9/13/2021 3:35 PM
I feel like we need to use Kurtis more when it comes to option offense. He made a great read last game on the option play to Tuggle for the TD. He can throw the ball anywhere on the field so far and he’s yet to throw under 50% in his short college career. I really don’t think changing the QB will solve our problems. I think the play calling these pay two game have been very tentative. The play from Odom to Rourke vs Cuse was what we needed and that gave us momentum. After that, we had soft play calling in my opinion.
mail
person
Victory
9/13/2021 5:05 PM
I know we are frustrated but, IMO, this sort of rhetoric is over the top. He has one of the better arms we have ever had at QB and he is just an amature. I think the problem is mostly that he is miscast running an offense centered around the Read Option.
mail
person
Urban Bobcat
9/13/2021 5:29 PM
What does it matter if our offense is only going to be on the field ten minutes a game?
mail
person
ExVideoCat
9/13/2021 6:11 PM
Victory wrote:expand_more
I know we are frustrated but, IMO, this sort of rhetoric is over the top. He has one of the better arms we have ever had at QB and he is just an amature. I think the problem is mostly that he is miscast running an offense centered around the Read Option.
BINGO! I’ve said this several times, but not being an Ohio fan during the Tett years I’ve been curious how the offense was adapted to his strengths.
mail
AlumDadDad
9/13/2021 6:13 PM
Perhaps we should be more concerned about the defense. Just a suggestion...
mail
person
Doc Bobcat
9/13/2021 6:17 PM
ExVideoCat wrote:expand_more
I know we are frustrated but, IMO, this sort of rhetoric is over the top. He has one of the better arms we have ever had at QB and he is just an amature. I think the problem is mostly that he is miscast running an offense centered around the Read Option.
BINGO! I’ve said this several times, but not being an Ohio fan during the Tett years I’ve been curious how the offense was adapted to his strengths.
Well duh.

He has a better arm than his brother.

His brother was a better runner.

Keep on running Frank’s offense with a QB who can’t run and see what happens.

Armani was the WAC Freshman of the year.

He currently is on the bench of a team that can’t beat Duquesne.

WTF
mail
person
mf279801
9/13/2021 6:23 PM
I think it’s safe to assume that a college student in 2021 has access to naked pictures, yes.
mail
person
BryanHall
9/13/2021 7:06 PM
ExVideoCat wrote:expand_more
I know we are frustrated but, IMO, this sort of rhetoric is over the top. He has one of the better arms we have ever had at QB and he is just an amature. I think the problem is mostly that he is miscast running an offense centered around the Read Option.
BINGO! I’ve said this several times, but not being an Ohio fan during the Tett years I’ve been curious how the offense was adapted to his strengths.
I know we moved to the pistol, but I thought that was the year before Tettleton took over. The offense was extremely deep in 2011 and Tettleton ran the ball a lot his first year as a starter (much more than his predecessors). In 2012 the team was supposed to make a run at a major bowl appearance but injuries really impacted the team (especially the secondary). Tettleton got banged up early in the season as well. The team ran the same pistol offense after that but Tettleton's running was limited in his last two years. It was a bit of a frustration to fans at that time since he was very athletic and we seemed to be limiting the team's options. Someone feel free to correct me in any way.
mail
person
Doc Bobcat
9/13/2021 7:13 PM
Tettleton for HC.
mail
OhioCatFan
9/13/2021 7:14 PM
Doc Bobcat wrote:expand_more
Tettleton for HC.
Hmm . . . this is an interesting thought. Won't happen, but an interesting thought nonetheless.
mail
person
Bobcat Love's Sense of Shame
9/13/2021 8:14 PM
Yes, let's give the job to someone who has never been in charge of anything, let alone run an organization with dozens(?) of employees and a hundred plus folks definitely not employees but are there all the time waiting on instruction.
mail
greencat
9/13/2021 9:37 PM
Doc Bobcat wrote:expand_more
Armani was the WAC Freshman of the year.

He currently is on the bench of a team that can’t beat Duquesne.

WTF

^ ^ WHAT HE SAID ^ ^

Losing to a FCS team with a full 63 schollie roster is one thing. Losing to a team with 40? That's pretty much a D-2 team.
mail
A-townBound
9/14/2021 8:28 AM
I had hoped last Saturday would have allowed us to see CJ Harris ...
Last Edited: 9/14/2021 8:29:09 AM by A-townBound
mail
person
AZBobcat
9/14/2021 11:05 AM
BryanHall wrote:expand_more
I know we are frustrated but, IMO, this sort of rhetoric is over the top. He has one of the better arms we have ever had at QB and he is just an amature. I think the problem is mostly that he is miscast running an offense centered around the Read Option.
BINGO! I’ve said this several times, but not being an Ohio fan during the Tett years I’ve been curious how the offense was adapted to his strengths.
I know we moved to the pistol, but I thought that was the year before Tettleton took over. The offense was extremely deep in 2011 and Tettleton ran the ball a lot his first year as a starter (much more than his predecessors). In 2012 the team was supposed to make a run at a major bowl appearance but injuries really impacted the team (especially the secondary). Tettleton got banged up early in the season as well. The team ran the same pistol offense after that but Tettleton's running was limited in his last two years. It was a bit of a frustration to fans at that time since he was very athletic and we seemed to be limiting the team's options. Someone feel free to correct me in any way.
This account is pretty much accurate to my memory. Did it ever come out why he completely stopped running? Did the staff tell him he was too important to get hurt again, or was he afraid to get hurt? It completely hamstrung the offense the last two years when nobody had to respect his running ability anymore, whereas during his first two years it seemed like he could run at will.
mail
Mike Johnson
9/14/2021 11:34 AM
AZBobcat wrote:expand_more
I know we are frustrated but, IMO, this sort of rhetoric is over the top. He has one of the better arms we have ever had at QB and he is just an amature. I think the problem is mostly that he is miscast running an offense centered around the Read Option.
BINGO! I’ve said this several times, but not being an Ohio fan during the Tett years I’ve been curious how the offense was adapted to his strengths.
I know we moved to the pistol, but I thought that was the year before Tettleton took over. The offense was extremely deep in 2011 and Tettleton ran the ball a lot his first year as a starter (much more than his predecessors). In 2012 the team was supposed to make a run at a major bowl appearance but injuries really impacted the team (especially the secondary). Tettleton got banged up early in the season as well. The team ran the same pistol offense after that but Tettleton's running was limited in his last two years. It was a bit of a frustration to fans at that time since he was very athletic and we seemed to be limiting the team's options. Someone feel free to correct me in any way.
This account is pretty much accurate to my memory. Did it ever come out why he completely stopped running? Did the staff tell him he was too important to get hurt again, or was he afraid to get hurt? It completely hamstrung the offense the last two years when nobody had to respect his running ability anymore, whereas during his first two years it seemed like he could run at will.
If my memory isn't failing me, TT's very first TD came on a run up the middle.
mail
person
SBH
9/14/2021 11:48 AM
That is correct.
mail
AlumDadDad
9/15/2021 10:25 AM
Once again, it's beyond me why we're lambasting Rourke in this thread when we have a defense that can't get off the field against an FCS opponent?

I won't go so far as to say that the offense has been hitting on all cylinders (no parts of the team have), but come on! He's probably our quarterback of the future (unless Harris fills that role), he has an excellent arm, but not much field time and an O-line missing two of it's most important members.

I would submit that this thread should be re-titled by substituting "Collins" for "Rourke". SMH.
mail
person
BryanHall
9/15/2021 1:41 PM
AlumDadDad wrote:expand_more
Once again, it's beyond me why we're lambasting Rourke in this thread when we have a defense that can't get off the field against an FCS opponent?

I won't go so far as to say that the offense has been hitting on all cylinders (no parts of the team have), but come on! He's probably our quarterback of the future (unless Harris fills that role), he has an excellent arm, but not much field time and an O-line missing two of it's most important members.

I would submit that this thread should be re-titled by substituting "Collins" for "Rourke". SMH.
Collins is the problem. His defense has been bad at getting off the field (with the exception of one bowl game) since he took over. Sometimes the key to effective management is demoting or firing someone you like. If this is necessary, would Albin be able to fire one of the guys he's been with for years?
mail
person
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
9/16/2021 3:48 PM
mf279801 wrote:expand_more
I think it’s safe to assume that a college student in 2021 has access to naked pictures, yes.
I would just like to acknowledge this joke. It made me laugh.
mail
LuckySparrow
9/16/2021 7:12 PM
Rourke is the least of our problems. He's a solid, accurate QB with a lot of potential. Our offensive playcalls have done him a disservice and put him in a tough position.

I think we could use Rodgers more but Rourke is the QB of the future and needs as many reps as possible.
mail
person
El Gato Roberto
9/16/2021 11:47 PM
It’s all about coaching at this level. I feel for the guy…but coach Tim is out of his depth. The kindest thing to do is put him out of his misery. Tough decision but someone needs to make it happen.
mail
RSBobcat
9/17/2021 12:10 AM
El Gato Roberto wrote:expand_more
It’s all about coaching at this level. I feel for the guy…but coach Tim is out of his depth. The kindest thing to do is put him out of his misery. Tough decision but someone needs to make it happen.
The contract buyout at this point looks like good investment vs 8-10 years of further/extended program decline/OHIO embarrassment....

It's also Frank's extended legacy - Wonder how he thinks about that? "Solich Field" etc. does not look so good if one of the worst teams in the country is playing on it....
mail
person
BryanHall
9/17/2021 12:55 AM
LuckySparrow wrote:expand_more
Rourke is the least of our problems. He's a solid, accurate QB with a lot of potential. Our offensive playcalls have done him a disservice and put him in a tough position.

I think we could use Rodgers more but Rourke is the QB of the future and needs as many reps as possible.
I don't get the playcalling at all. I don't mind the alternating quarterbacks much. It just seems like it doesn't make sense when they do it. They were down in the second half and needed passing--they bring in Rodgers. They get close to the goal line and keep Rourke in for the option. The two quarterbacks at the same time make more sense if Rodgers is not taking the snaps. Having Rourke split out at WR for several plays in a row is kinda puzzling.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 42
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
chevron_forward
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)