Miami having a tie breaker over Toledo and Ohio even though they lost to both is beyond stupid.
Is this really true? If so, the MAC has taken "fuzzy math" to a whole new level.
Not according to the official MAC tie-breaker policy when you have 3 or more teams tied.
Scenario – More than Two Teams
1. Combined head-to-head win percentage among the tied teams if all
tied teams are common opponents.
2. If all the tied teams are not common opponents, the tied team that
defeated each of the other tied teams advances.
3. Win percentage versus all common opponents.
4. Win percentage versus common opponents based upon their order
of finish (overall conference win percentage, with ties broken) and
proceeding through other common opponents based upon their
order of finish.
5. Combined conference win percentage of conference opponents.
https://getsomemaction.com/documents/2024/9/18//2024_MAC_... #1 Toledo/Miami/Ohio finish tied at 6-2.
1. Tied teams not opponents so doesn't apply.
2. Toledo and Ohio both beat Miami so they advance.
3. Win percentage against common opponents Toledo & Ohio have the same.
4. Win percentage based on order of finish Ball State > Bowling Green
5. Toledo has a better win percentage because didn't play UMass.
#2 CMU/Miami/Ohio finish tied at 6-2.
1. Tied teams not opponents so doesn't apply.
2. Ohio beat Miami so they advance.
#3 Ball St/Ohio finish tied at 6-2.
1. Ball State beat Ohio so they advance.
If BG and Ball State both finish 3-5 in MAC play then Toledo would edge Ohio out beause of better MAC strength of schedule.
Last Edited: 11/13/2025 6:42:56 PM by TWT