I feel like this was done on the cheap...no padding, awful logo at midfield....complete lack of forethought here. You're stuck with this for the next 10 years now.
To me, that is not our logo. It's like you took an eraser to remove the "Ohio" part. If anything, I'd rather just have the arch Ohio at mid-field. The cat looks very high school-ish to me.
Considering the rash of injuries to our players I would have thought padding was a no brainer regardless of the actual cause of the injuries. Minimize the risk and maybe you minimize a few injuries. I'm guessing the hospital fees and rehab fees were far more than the additional $50K to install padding.
I've designed a number of Synthetic Turf fields using Field Turf. I've never heard of using padding (the official name is "E" layer) for a Field Turf installation.
I'm in the middle of a design project for a field so I asked Field Turf about using padding.
They said that their infill system is designed to eliminate the need for any type of padding.
A field's "hardness" is measued by what is called "G-Max'. The required "G-Max" is determined based on a field's primary use.
Every field I've done has exceeded the specified G-Max, using infill alone,
It is essential that a field be properly "groomed' to maintain the G-Max.
As another poster said,you don't want a field to be too soft or its like running in loose sand.
We try to set the G-Max to mimic the "hardness" of a natural turf surface.