menu
Logo
99+
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
99+
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Week 2 MAC Schedule
Page: 1 of 2
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/9/2022 2:19 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Odds from Caesar's via ESPN.


Western Michigan (-6.5) at Ball State
Akron (+34.5) at Michigan State
Eastern Kentucky at Bowling Green (No Line)
Holy Cross at Buffalo (No Line)
South Alabama at Central Michigan (-5)
Eastern Michigan (+11.5) at Louisiana
Kent State (+33) at Oklahoma
Robert Morris at Miami (No Line)
Northern Illinois (+6.5) at Tulsa
Ohio (+25) at Penn State
UMass at Toledo (-28.5)
Victory
General User
V
Member Since: 3/11/2012
Post Count: 2,519
person
mail
Victory
mail
Posted: 9/9/2022 3:32 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Bowling Green is only a 6 point favorite. Miami is 35.5.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/9/2022 8:15 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Victory wrote:expand_more
Bowling Green is only a 6 point favorite. Miami is 35.5.
EKU played EMU really close last week and is getting votes in the 1AA poll this week.

Toledo is most likely among MAC teams to go to 2-0, maybe NIU will get there as well; Tulsa has been only so-so lately.

Ohio, Akron, EMU, MOFO, Buffalo and CMU should join the WMU-BSU winner at 1-1.

WMU-BSU loser, Kent and maybe BG go to 0-2
ctb
General User
C
Member Since: 8/30/2014
Location: OH
Post Count: 126
person
mail
ctb
mail
Posted: 9/9/2022 10:34 PM
settings_applications edit_note
We have better odds of beating Penn State than UMass does of beating Toledo! Lol
Victory
General User
V
Member Since: 3/11/2012
Post Count: 2,519
person
mail
Victory
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 2:28 PM
settings_applications edit_note
CMU might get blown out as a home favorite. The MAC is looking bad.
ou79
General User
O79
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 671
person
mail
ou79
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 3:09 PM
settings_applications edit_note
The MAC is clearly the bottom feeder of all FBS and arguably one of the worst conferences in all of D-I football.
TWT
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
mail
TWT
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 4:00 PM
settings_applications edit_note
ou79 wrote:expand_more
The MAC is clearly the bottom feeder of all FBS and arguably one of the worst conferences in all of D-I football.
That said the bobcats finished up playing Penn State today on ABC. The opportunities are no doubt there but the team fails to capitalize on them. Program can only point the finger at themselves.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 4:09 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Campus Flow wrote:expand_more
The MAC is clearly the bottom feeder of all FBS and arguably one of the worst conferences in all of D-I football.
That said the bobcats finished up playing Penn State today on ABC. The opportunities are no doubt there but the team fails to capitalize on them. Program can only point the finger at themselves.
I’m sorry but Ohio was never going to win that game today. Way too much talent difference. It could have been 70-7 if they wanted to do that.
ou79
General User
O79
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 671
person
mail
ou79
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 4:28 PM
settings_applications edit_note
My statement above about the MAC is not in regard to OUr loss today and yes Penn State could have hung 70 on us. If you look at how the MAC is doing as a Conference NO team has stepped up to the plate. It is not about today's loss, just look at how the MAC overall has done in this short season and how it did last year. I am sitting here watching App State up on Texas A&M 7-0 in the second quarter. Does that mean App State will win? Probably not but at least they play P-5 teams tight. Look at what they did with North Carolina last week. It is as if the MAC has no expectations other than to be the annual bottom feeder of all FBS.
Casper71
General User
C71
Member Since: 12/1/2006
Post Count: 3,237
person
mail
Casper71
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 4:47 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Face of guys, the lMAC is at the bottom of the pile because we get the bottom of the recruits. It is all about recruiting playmakers. This conference does not get enough playmakers anymore.
TWT
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
mail
TWT
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 5:43 PM
settings_applications edit_note
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
The MAC is clearly the bottom feeder of all FBS and arguably one of the worst conferences in all of D-I football.
That said the bobcats finished up playing Penn State today on ABC. The opportunities are no doubt there but the team fails to capitalize on them. Program can only point the finger at themselves.
I’m sorry but Ohio was never going to win that game today. Way too much talent difference. It could have been 70-7 if they wanted to do that.
That is beside the point. Conferences are about TV exposure and Ohio receives plenty of it in the MAC. Team isn't even good and its on ABC. At least this is the primary way I would judge conference adequacy. There was a time where you could argue if only the bobcats have exposure to grow the program they could take advantage of it.

Basketball has more of a problem with finding an opponent and TV appearances in the MAC compared to football.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 5:48 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Casper71 wrote:expand_more
Face of guys, the lMAC is at the bottom of the pile because we get the bottom of the recruits. It is all about recruiting playmakers. This conference does not get enough playmakers anymore.
Being in the footprint of the Big Ten doesn’t help. The Midwest is not exactly the center of the football talent pool anymore. That’s shifted to the south it would seem.

And it’s also about coaching, the pay, perks, facilities, attention etc is so low that any coach who is any good gets picked off by the other leagues after a few years.
Last Edited: 9/10/2022 5:55:09 PM by colobobcat66
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 5:53 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Campus Flow wrote:expand_more
The MAC is clearly the bottom feeder of all FBS and arguably one of the worst conferences in all of D-I football.
That said the bobcats finished up playing Penn State today on ABC. The opportunities are no doubt there but the team fails to capitalize on them. Program can only point the finger at themselves.
I’m sorry but Ohio was never going to win that game today. Way too much talent difference. It could have been 70-7 if they wanted to do that.
That is beside the point. Conferences are about TV exposure and Ohio receives plenty of it in the MAC. Team isn't even good and its on ABC. At least this is the primary way I would judge conference adequacy. There was a time where you could argue if only the bobcats have exposure to grow the program they could take advantage of it.

Basketball has more of a problem with finding an opponent and TV appearances in the MAC compared to football.
Well I think the Bobcats did take advantage of the exposure and moved from the dregs of football. It seems Everybody has exposure now, so the MAC has lost some of that one time advantage.
TWT
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
mail
TWT
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 6:39 PM
settings_applications edit_note
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
The MAC is clearly the bottom feeder of all FBS and arguably one of the worst conferences in all of D-I football.
That said the bobcats finished up playing Penn State today on ABC. The opportunities are no doubt there but the team fails to capitalize on them. Program can only point the finger at themselves.
I’m sorry but Ohio was never going to win that game today. Way too much talent difference. It could have been 70-7 if they wanted to do that.
That is beside the point. Conferences are about TV exposure and Ohio receives plenty of it in the MAC. Team isn't even good and its on ABC. At least this is the primary way I would judge conference adequacy. There was a time where you could argue if only the bobcats have exposure to grow the program they could take advantage of it.

Basketball has more of a problem with finding an opponent and TV appearances in the MAC compared to football.
Well I think the Bobcats did take advantage of the exposure and moved from the dregs of football. It seems Everybody has exposure now, so the MAC has lost some of that one time advantage.
The midweek exposure is as good as it gets for a smaller program. Better than buried at the bottom of P5 conference and rarely on.

No question the program is struggling and the MAC is not good but a strong MAC is a MAC Ohio isn't winning. Thus I don't understand the complaint of a weak MAC because it opens the door for a program to take it over. A different way of looking at it.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,310
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 6:40 PM
settings_applications edit_note
BG staring down EKUs barrel.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 7:11 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Campus Flow wrote:expand_more
The MAC is clearly the bottom feeder of all FBS and arguably one of the worst conferences in all of D-I football.
That said the bobcats finished up playing Penn State today on ABC. The opportunities are no doubt there but the team fails to capitalize on them. Program can only point the finger at themselves.
I’m sorry but Ohio was never going to win that game today. Way too much talent difference. It could have been 70-7 if they wanted to do that.
That is beside the point. Conferences are about TV exposure and Ohio receives plenty of it in the MAC. Team isn't even good and its on ABC. At least this is the primary way I would judge conference adequacy. There was a time where you could argue if only the bobcats have exposure to grow the program they could take advantage of it.

Basketball has more of a problem with finding an opponent and TV appearances in the MAC compared to football.
Well I think the Bobcats did take advantage of the exposure and moved from the dregs of football. It seems Everybody has exposure now, so the MAC has lost some of that one time advantage.
The midweek exposure is as good as it gets for a smaller program. Better than buried at the bottom of P5 conference and rarely on.

No question the program is struggling and the MAC is not good but a strong MAC is a MAC Ohio isn't winning. Thus I don't understand the complaint of a weak MAC because it opens the door for a program to take it over. A different way of looking at it.

I’m guessing wins by Marshall or App state on national tv is better than a 100 games on midweek tv.
TWT
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
mail
TWT
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 8:27 PM
settings_applications edit_note
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
The MAC is clearly the bottom feeder of all FBS and arguably one of the worst conferences in all of D-I football.
That said the bobcats finished up playing Penn State today on ABC. The opportunities are no doubt there but the team fails to capitalize on them. Program can only point the finger at themselves.
I’m sorry but Ohio was never going to win that game today. Way too much talent difference. It could have been 70-7 if they wanted to do that.
That is beside the point. Conferences are about TV exposure and Ohio receives plenty of it in the MAC. Team isn't even good and its on ABC. At least this is the primary way I would judge conference adequacy. There was a time where you could argue if only the bobcats have exposure to grow the program they could take advantage of it.

Basketball has more of a problem with finding an opponent and TV appearances in the MAC compared to football.
Well I think the Bobcats did take advantage of the exposure and moved from the dregs of football. It seems Everybody has exposure now, so the MAC has lost some of that one time advantage.
The midweek exposure is as good as it gets for a smaller program. Better than buried at the bottom of P5 conference and rarely on.

No question the program is struggling and the MAC is not good but a strong MAC is a MAC Ohio isn't winning. Thus I don't understand the complaint of a weak MAC because it opens the door for a program to take it over. A different way of looking at it.

I’m guessing wins by Marshall or App state on national tv is better than a 100 games on midweek tv.
Ohio was on national TV this week too. Didn't do anything.
TWT
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
mail
TWT
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 8:30 PM
settings_applications edit_note
colobobcat66 wrote:expand_more
Face of guys, the lMAC is at the bottom of the pile because we get the bottom of the recruits. It is all about recruiting playmakers. This conference does not get enough playmakers anymore.
Being in the footprint of the Big Ten doesn’t help. The Midwest is not exactly the center of the football talent pool anymore. That’s shifted to the south it would seem.

And it’s also about coaching, the pay, perks, facilities, attention etc is so low that any coach who is any good gets picked off by the other leagues after a few years.
Can't argue what you are saying here but could some of those factors like name, image and likeness increase the gap WITHIN the MAC? My guess would be yes with all the possible opportunities.
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,310
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 8:34 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Hahaha Bowling Green u suk
TWT
General User
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
mail
TWT
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 8:48 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Kent St playing Oklahoma tough.
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 9:47 PM
settings_applications edit_note
EMU leading Louisiana 14-0 early in the 3rd quarter.

BG loses to EKU in 7OT; Buffalo loses to Holy Cross, Batman.
Last Edited: 9/10/2022 9:52:42 PM by Pataskala
shabamon
General User
Member Since: 11/17/2006
Location: Cincinnati
Post Count: 7,310
mail
shabamon
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 10:06 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Hahaaaaaa Bulls u succ too
Eagle66
General User
E66
Member Since: 3/13/2005
Post Count: 1,329
person
mail
Eagle66
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 10:07 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Pataskala wrote:expand_more
EMU leading Louisiana 14-0 early in the 3rd quarter.

BG loses to EKU in 7OT; Buffalo loses to Holy Cross, Batman.
BG gave up a TD as time expired to go to those 7 OTs. Then U@B gives up a 45 yard Hail Mary to Holy Cross as time expires to lose. Yikes.

On a positive note, NIU just retook the lead at Tulsa
Pataskala
General User
P
Member Since: 7/8/2010
Location: At least six feet away from anybody else
Post Count: 9,465
person
mail
Pataskala
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 10:16 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Eagle66 wrote:expand_more
EMU leading Louisiana 14-0 early in the 3rd quarter.

BG loses to EKU in 7OT; Buffalo loses to Holy Cross, Batman.
BG gave up a TD as time expired to go to those 7 OTs. Then mailto:U@B gives up a 45 yard Hail Mary to Holy Cross as time expires to lose. Yikes.

On a positive note, NIU just retook the lead at Tulsa
The NIU game has been a real barn-burner. The lead changed hands three times in the first nine minutes of the 4th quarter.
colobobcat66
General User
C66
Member Since: 9/1/2006
Location: Watching the bobcats run outside my window., CO
Post Count: 4,744
person
mail
colobobcat66
mail
Posted: 9/10/2022 10:21 PM
settings_applications edit_note
Campus Flow wrote:expand_more
The MAC is clearly the bottom feeder of all FBS and arguably one of the worst conferences in all of D-I football.
That said the bobcats finished up playing Penn State today on ABC. The opportunities are no doubt there but the team fails to capitalize on them. Program can only point the finger at themselves.
I’m sorry but Ohio was never going to win that game today. Way too much talent difference. It could have been 70-7 if they wanted to do that.
That is beside the point. Conferences are about TV exposure and Ohio receives plenty of it in the MAC. Team isn't even good and its on ABC. At least this is the primary way I would judge conference adequacy. There was a time where you could argue if only the bobcats have exposure to grow the program they could take advantage of it.

Basketball has more of a problem with finding an opponent and TV appearances in the MAC compared to football.
Well I think the Bobcats did take advantage of the exposure and moved from the dregs of football. It seems Everybody has exposure now, so the MAC has lost some of that one time advantage.
The midweek exposure is as good as it gets for a smaller program. Better than buried at the bottom of P5 conference and rarely on.

No question the program is struggling and the MAC is not good but a strong MAC is a MAC Ohio isn't winning. Thus I don't understand the complaint of a weak MAC because it opens the door for a program to take it over. A different way of looking at it.

I’m guessing wins by Marshall or App state on national tv is better than a 100 games on midweek tv.
Ohio was on national TV this week too. Didn't do anything.

They lost bad. Winning those games is what helps.
Showing Messages: 1 - 25 of 28
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
chevron_forward
MAC News Links



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)