Ten years ago we were helped by all the emotion on their side following the Sandusky scandal and Paterno's firing. Everybody knew coming in that the air would go out of the stadium after the first quarter or so, which would give our guys a chance to pull the upset if they just kept it close. And it happened just that way. I'm not sure we could've beaten them a year later or even a week later; that first game was just that emotional for Penn State players and fans.
Truth is, very few G5 teams have ever been able to consistently upset the upper echelon "P" teams, but most G5 teams can still be competitive with middle and lower "P"s. The best we can probably hope for in any year vs the likes of Penn State is to be competitive at least in the first half and see what happens after that. Cash the check and keep the injuries to a minimum.
I'm not saying you're wrong about "all the emotion on their side." But then as now my take differs from yours. That game was Ohio's season opener. It was Penn State's second game, and if I am recalling correctly, they lost that opener to Virginia. The scandal notwithstanding, I expected the Lions to be roaring when they took the field against the Bobcats.
At first the Lions showed bite, moving out to a 14-0 lead. Then it was as though the Bobcats pulled hard on a switch. For the remainder of the game I saw both Ohio's defense and offense playing to - and perhaps beyond - their potential.
After Ohio scored late to go up 24-14 - a memorable drive - the game effectively ended with an Ohio linebacker making a diving interception.
All in all, the outcome seemed anything but a fluke that could be ascribed to "all the emotion on their side."