menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Time for the MAC to...
Page: 4 of 4
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 8/24/2010 4:40 PM
The Situation wrote:expand_more
Nobody used the word "fraud", it is simply a shell game of where the money actually comes from as far as which accounts, move the deficit to where you want so as to make another area look just a little bit better.


I'd have to agree. Otherwise it's entirely too ironic that the University at Buffalo had revenues that matched expenses to the dollar in both basketball and football of both genders..


Exactly, and these schools and departments get audited so there is no legal funny business going on, just a non-truth into actual expenditures.  An example of this is this coming year to save money the football team is not paying for the athletes to stay in hotels on the night before home games.  Now that doesn't mean that Athletics isn't paying for this, only that they shifted that "burden" out of football and into some other account.  So there, in a quick stroke football just cut $25-$30K out of it's budget, that still does not mean that Athletics as a whole cut that same $25-$30K.  This was stated by the Department itself in a spring Post article.
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
General User
BSNNTO
Member Since: 2/4/2005
Post Count: 3,057
person
mail
Brian Smith (No, not that one)
mail
Posted: 8/24/2010 11:03 PM
If things get really bad the U. Should buy 10 Winnebagos and have the teams sleep in a Wal Mart parking lot.

/my frugal German Mennonite grandparents
Athens
General User
A
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Location: Alexandria, VA
Post Count: 5,454
person
mail
Athens
mail
Posted: 8/25/2010 9:09 AM
Your Name wrote:expand_more
The half shell plan you are talking about extended all the way down to the playing surface would add about another 8,000 seats, relatIVely easy to do. Put another 10,000 seats where the mound is and then you have a 42,000 seat stadium.


Awesome. So instead of 15,000 fans in a 24,000 seat stadium, they will be in a 42,000 seater.


Ugh. My point has been lost in translation in that the as-is appearance of Peden Stadium is sufficient to attract fans to the stadium (something we've all questioned). Without the mound there is only 22,000 seats in the stadium and I think since we've proven even if it is only on occassion to exceed 22,000 more seats are justified and needed if this program is ever going to be able to put 25,000 in the house on a regular occassion. I recommend a re-deck of the main stands to 26,000 for the time being then more down the road if the program starts selling out consistently.  
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 8/25/2010 9:16 AM
Wes wrote:expand_more
The half shell plan you are talking about extended all the way down to the playing surface would add about another 8,000 seats, relatIVely easy to do. Put another 10,000 seats where the mound is and then you have a 42,000 seat stadium.


Awesome. So instead of 15,000 fans in a 24,000 seat stadium, they will be in a 42,000 seater.




Ugh. My point has been lost in translation in that the as-is appearance of Peden Stadium is sufficient to attract fans to the stadium (something we've all questioned). Without the mound there is only 22,000 seats in the stadium and I think since we've proven even if it is only on occassion to exceed 22,000 more seats are justified and needed if this program is ever going to be able to put 25,000 in the house on a regular occassion. I recommend a re-deck of the main stands to 26,000 for the time being then more down the road if the program starts selling out consistently.  


And you are providing the start up cost for this? ;)
Last Edited: 8/25/2010 9:17:06 AM by John C. Wanamaker
Showing Messages: 76 - 79 of 79
MAC News Links
Wednesday, May 13, 2026



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)