menu
Logo
Bobcat Attack Menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: Why do you think they went for two?
Page: 1 of 1
Stand_Up_And_Cheer
General User
Member Since: 1/21/2005
Post Count: 95
mail
Stand_Up_And_Cheer
mail
Posted: 9/26/2010 8:29 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Was it because...

a) turned the whole season around when it worked last year
b) didn't think we could win in overtime
c) maintain momentum..
d) ...?
Doc Bobcat
General User
DB
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 4,421
person
mail
Doc Bobcat
mail
Posted: 9/26/2010 9:44 AM
settings_applications edit_note
I would guess a....and the fact that we had the big MO with us....even though it was a fleeting moment.
Hooligan
General User
H
Member Since: 12/20/2004
Post Count: 223
person
mail
Hooligan
mail
Posted: 9/26/2010 10:21 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Makes no sense to go for 2 when:
The Hail Franshaw play blew the top off of the Ohio sideline, the 'Cats had momentum.
Marshall just got deflated.
The D was playing very well the second half.
Ohio has a great kicker.
Marshall has a bad kicker.

Boo should be the qb. The 'Cats have no running game.  McCrae is awesome. Dunlop over the middle works.
Tim Burke
General User
Member Since: 11/23/2004
Location: St. Petersburg, FL
Post Count: 607
mail
Tim Burke
mail
Posted: 9/26/2010 10:44 AM
settings_applications edit_note
Please see my post in the poll thread as to why going for two is the optimal strategy in that situation.
Showing Messages: 1 - 4 of 4
reply
vertical_align_top
vertical_align_center
vertical_align_bottom
add_comment
MAC News Links
chevron_left
Wednesday, May 13, 2026
chevron_right



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)