menu
Logo
Ohio Football Topic
Topic: randy moss tradding to vikings for 3rd round pick - hmmmm
Page: 1 of 1
Turney13
General User
T13
Member Since: 7/28/2010
Post Count: 364
person
mail
Turney13
mail
Posted: 10/6/2010 9:53 AM
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 10/6/2010 10:23 AM
Know what you are thinking, however Taylor has a ways to go, he has been inactive the past two weeks, this ought to help him get into uniform but things clearly are not on a fast track for Taylor.  Early talk is Tate is going to assume Moss's role.
Kinggeorge4
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Guysville, OH
Post Count: 1,087
mail
Kinggeorge4
mail
Posted: 10/6/2010 10:31 AM
On KFFL they are talking of him finally being active and the 4th receiver at best.
sargentfan
General User
S
Member Since: 3/17/2005
Post Count: 917
person
mail
sargentfan
mail
Posted: 10/6/2010 10:34 AM
Will be interesting to see if Price gets some playing time, I see the main two receivers being Ben Tate and Wes Welker, then Julian Edelman, but after that who knows. 
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 10/6/2010 10:43 AM
That's the question, the Pats have been carrying 5 RB's and only 4 WR's
Kinggeorge4
General User
Member Since: 12/22/2004
Location: Guysville, OH
Post Count: 1,087
mail
Kinggeorge4
mail
Posted: 10/6/2010 11:17 AM
They also talked about the good play of their TE as another reason for limited playing time.  They feel the three TE's have changed the offense for them.
OU didn't know
General User
ODK
Member Since: 3/20/2005
Post Count: 185
person
mail
OU didn't know
mail
Posted: 10/6/2010 12:08 PM
Should be interesting as to what this means for Taylor.  The Pats hold the Raiders first rounder in next years draft, and I would have to imagine they are going to target A.J. Green.  With two picks in each of the first four rounds, they have plenty of ammo to move up if necessary.  Unless something big happens, Taylor is still at least behind Welker, Tate, Edelman, and Hernandez in terms of targets.  Add Green into the mix, and he's got quite a bit of work to do.
doubledribble
General User
D
Member Since: 10/6/2010
Post Count: 558
person
mail
doubledribble
mail
Posted: 10/6/2010 8:22 PM
Do any of our readers have any good inside info from out east on how Taylor is doing, and what do the Patriots think of him? 
John C. Wanamaker
General User
Member Since: 1/2/2005
Post Count: 1,103
mail
John C. Wanamaker
mail
Posted: 10/7/2010 8:25 AM
Well he has been inactive for each game, so I would say his progress is at best on target (if they had slow expectations), to a work in progress.    More than anything this is a business, sometimes feelings and progress have nothing to do with decisions.
sargentfan
General User
S
Member Since: 3/17/2005
Post Count: 917
person
mail
sargentfan
mail
Posted: 10/7/2010 10:58 AM
You can almost never base a receiver's progress on his first year, a very hard position to do well at right out of the gate, especially for any drafted 3rd round or beyond. 
D.A.
General User
DA
Member Since: 8/6/2010
Location: Georgetown, ME
Post Count: 1,198
person
mail
D.A.
mail
Posted: 10/7/2010 4:19 PM
Pretty cut and dried from the Boston press:
  • Taylor impressed in camp but with their depth at WR (especially Welker being healthy for the start of the season), they have needed to sit SOMEONE at WR because of the sheer numbers at the position, and Taylor has been that guy.
  • Tate has impressed on kick returns and was higher on the depth chart, so Taylor didn't have a chance at PT through that role.
  • With Moss gone, Taylor may now dress, but he will continue to see limited opportunity with the focus now going heavy to incorporating TE's and the success of Danny Woodhead (who replaced Kevin Faulk as the backfield passing option) in the last two games.
Showing Messages: 1 - 11 of 11
MAC News Links
Tuesday, May 12, 2026



extra small (< 576px)
small (>= 576px)
medium (>= 768px)
large (>= 992px)
x-large (>= 1200px)
xx-large (>= 1400px)